Clinical and diagnostic implications of Alzheimer's disease copathology in Lewy body disease.

IF 10.6 1区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Brain Pub Date : 2024-10-03 DOI:10.1093/brain/awae203
Lorenzo Barba, Samir Abu-Rumeileh, Henryk Barthel, Federico Massa, Matteo Foschi, Giovanni Bellomo, Lorenzo Gaetani, Dietmar R Thal, Lucilla Parnetti, Markus Otto
{"title":"Clinical and diagnostic implications of Alzheimer's disease copathology in Lewy body disease.","authors":"Lorenzo Barba, Samir Abu-Rumeileh, Henryk Barthel, Federico Massa, Matteo Foschi, Giovanni Bellomo, Lorenzo Gaetani, Dietmar R Thal, Lucilla Parnetti, Markus Otto","doi":"10.1093/brain/awae203","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Concomitant Alzheimer's disease (AD) pathology is a frequent event in the context of Lewy body disease (LBD), occurring in approximately half of all cases. Evidence shows that LBD patients with AD copathology show an accelerated disease course, a greater risk of cognitive decline and an overall poorer prognosis. However, LBD-AD cases may show heterogeneous motor and non-motor phenotypes with a higher risk of dementia and, consequently, be not rarely misdiagnosed. In this review, we summarize the current understanding of LBD-AD by discussing the synergistic effects of AD neuropathological changes and Lewy pathology and their clinical relevance. Furthermore, we provide an extensive overview of neuroimaging and fluid biomarkers under assessment for use in LBD-AD and their possible diagnostic and prognostic values. AD pathology can be predicted in vivo by means of CSF, MRI and PET markers, whereas the most promising technique to date for identifying Lewy pathology in different biological tissues is the α-synuclein seed amplification assay. Pathological imaging and CSF AD biomarkers are associated with a higher likelihood of cognitive decline in LBD but do not always mirror the neuropathological severity as in pure AD. Implementing the use of blood-based AD biomarkers might allow faster screening of LBD patients for AD copathology, thus improving the overall diagnostic sensitivity for LBD-AD. Finally, we discuss the literature on novel candidate biomarkers being exploited in LBD-AD to investigate other aspects of neurodegeneration, such as neuroaxonal injury, glial activation and synaptic dysfunction. The thorough characterization of AD copathology in LBD should be taken into account when considering differential diagnoses of dementia syndromes, to allow prognostic evaluation on an individual level, and to guide symptomatic and disease-modifying therapies.</p>","PeriodicalId":9063,"journal":{"name":"Brain","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":10.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brain","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awae203","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Concomitant Alzheimer's disease (AD) pathology is a frequent event in the context of Lewy body disease (LBD), occurring in approximately half of all cases. Evidence shows that LBD patients with AD copathology show an accelerated disease course, a greater risk of cognitive decline and an overall poorer prognosis. However, LBD-AD cases may show heterogeneous motor and non-motor phenotypes with a higher risk of dementia and, consequently, be not rarely misdiagnosed. In this review, we summarize the current understanding of LBD-AD by discussing the synergistic effects of AD neuropathological changes and Lewy pathology and their clinical relevance. Furthermore, we provide an extensive overview of neuroimaging and fluid biomarkers under assessment for use in LBD-AD and their possible diagnostic and prognostic values. AD pathology can be predicted in vivo by means of CSF, MRI and PET markers, whereas the most promising technique to date for identifying Lewy pathology in different biological tissues is the α-synuclein seed amplification assay. Pathological imaging and CSF AD biomarkers are associated with a higher likelihood of cognitive decline in LBD but do not always mirror the neuropathological severity as in pure AD. Implementing the use of blood-based AD biomarkers might allow faster screening of LBD patients for AD copathology, thus improving the overall diagnostic sensitivity for LBD-AD. Finally, we discuss the literature on novel candidate biomarkers being exploited in LBD-AD to investigate other aspects of neurodegeneration, such as neuroaxonal injury, glial activation and synaptic dysfunction. The thorough characterization of AD copathology in LBD should be taken into account when considering differential diagnoses of dementia syndromes, to allow prognostic evaluation on an individual level, and to guide symptomatic and disease-modifying therapies.

路易体病中阿尔茨海默病共同病理学的临床和诊断意义。
伴随阿尔茨海默病(AD)病理改变是路易体病(LBD)的常见症状,约占所有病例的一半。有证据表明,伴有阿尔茨海默病病理变化的路易体病患者病程加快,认知能力下降的风险更高,总体预后较差。然而,枸杞多糖-AD 病例可能表现出异质性运动和非运动表型,痴呆风险更高,因此被误诊的情况并不少见。在这篇综述中,我们通过讨论 AD 神经病理变化与路易病理学之间的协同作用及其临床相关性,总结了 LBD-AD 的最新进展。此外,我们还广泛概述了正在评估的 LBD-AD 神经影像和体液生物标志物及其可能的诊断和预后价值。通过脑脊液、核磁共振成像(MRI)和正电子发射计算机断层扫描(PET)标记物可以怀疑体内的 AD 病理学,而α-突触核蛋白种子扩增检测(SAA)是迄今为止最有希望在不同生物组织中识别路易病理学的技术。病理成像和脑脊液 AD 生物标志物与路易氏病认知能力下降的可能性较高有关,但并不总是像纯 AD 那样反映神经病理学的严重程度。基于血液的 AD 生物标志物的应用可快速筛查 LBD 患者的 AD 共病理学,从而提高 LBD-AD 的整体诊断灵敏度。最后,我们讨论了有关 LBD-AD 中新型候选生物标志物的文献,这些生物标志物可用于研究神经变性的其他方面,如神经轴损伤、神经胶质细胞活化和突触功能障碍。在对痴呆综合征进行鉴别诊断、对个体进行预后评估以及指导对症治疗和疾病调节疗法时,应考虑到对枸杞多糖-AD 共病理学的全面描述。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Brain
Brain 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
20.30
自引率
4.10%
发文量
458
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Brain, a journal focused on clinical neurology and translational neuroscience, has been publishing landmark papers since 1878. The journal aims to expand its scope by including studies that shed light on disease mechanisms and conducting innovative clinical trials for brain disorders. With a wide range of topics covered, the Editorial Board represents the international readership and diverse coverage of the journal. Accepted articles are promptly posted online, typically within a few weeks of acceptance. As of 2022, Brain holds an impressive impact factor of 14.5, according to the Journal Citation Reports.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信