Prediction of bedload transport inside vegetation canopies with natural morphology

IF 2.5 3区 工程技术
Li He, Yu-qi Shan, Chao Liu, Hui Cao, Xing-nian Liu, Yakun Guo
{"title":"Prediction of bedload transport inside vegetation canopies with natural morphology","authors":"Li He, Yu-qi Shan, Chao Liu, Hui Cao, Xing-nian Liu, Yakun Guo","doi":"10.1007/s42241-024-0033-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Due to vegetation drag and vegetation-generated turbulence, bedload transport in vegetated channels is more complicated than that in nonvegetated channels. It is challenging to obtain accurate predictions of bedload transport in vegetated channels. Previous studies generally used rigid circular cylinders to simulate vegetation, and the impact of plant morphology on bedload transport was typically ignored; these methods deviate from natural scenarios, resulting in prediction errors in transport rates of more than an order of magnitude. This study measured bedload transport rates inside <i>P. australis, A. calamus</i> and <i>T. latifolia</i> canopies and in arrays of rigid cylinders for comparison. The impact of plant morphology on bedload transport in vegetated channels was examined. Inside the canopies of natural morphology, the primary factor driving bedload transport is the near-bed turbulent kinetic energy (TKE), which consists of both bed-generated and vegetation-generated turbulence. A method was proposed to predict the near-bed TKE inside canopies with natural morphology. For the same solid volume fraction of plants, the transport rate inside canopies with a natural morphology is greater than or equal to that within an array of rigid cylinders, depending on the plant shape. This finding indicates that plant morphology has a significant impact on transport rates in vegetated regions and cannot be ignored, which is typical in practice. Four classic bedload transport equations (the Meyer-Peter-Müller, Einstein, Engelund and Dou equations), which are suitable for bare channels (no vegetation), were modified in terms of the near-bed TKE. The predicted near-bed TKE was inserted into these four equations to predict the transport rate in canopies with natural morphology. A comparison of the predictions indicated that the Meyer-Peter-Müller equation had the highest accuracy in predicting the transport rate in vegetated landscapes.</p>","PeriodicalId":637,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hydrodynamics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hydrodynamics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s42241-024-0033-7","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Due to vegetation drag and vegetation-generated turbulence, bedload transport in vegetated channels is more complicated than that in nonvegetated channels. It is challenging to obtain accurate predictions of bedload transport in vegetated channels. Previous studies generally used rigid circular cylinders to simulate vegetation, and the impact of plant morphology on bedload transport was typically ignored; these methods deviate from natural scenarios, resulting in prediction errors in transport rates of more than an order of magnitude. This study measured bedload transport rates inside P. australis, A. calamus and T. latifolia canopies and in arrays of rigid cylinders for comparison. The impact of plant morphology on bedload transport in vegetated channels was examined. Inside the canopies of natural morphology, the primary factor driving bedload transport is the near-bed turbulent kinetic energy (TKE), which consists of both bed-generated and vegetation-generated turbulence. A method was proposed to predict the near-bed TKE inside canopies with natural morphology. For the same solid volume fraction of plants, the transport rate inside canopies with a natural morphology is greater than or equal to that within an array of rigid cylinders, depending on the plant shape. This finding indicates that plant morphology has a significant impact on transport rates in vegetated regions and cannot be ignored, which is typical in practice. Four classic bedload transport equations (the Meyer-Peter-Müller, Einstein, Engelund and Dou equations), which are suitable for bare channels (no vegetation), were modified in terms of the near-bed TKE. The predicted near-bed TKE was inserted into these four equations to predict the transport rate in canopies with natural morphology. A comparison of the predictions indicated that the Meyer-Peter-Müller equation had the highest accuracy in predicting the transport rate in vegetated landscapes.

具有自然形态的植被冠层内床面负荷迁移预测
由于植被阻力和植被产生的湍流,植被渠道的床面负荷输运比无植被渠道更为复杂。要准确预测植被渠道中的床面负荷迁移具有挑战性。以往的研究一般使用刚性圆柱来模拟植被,通常忽略了植物形态对床面负荷运移的影响;这些方法偏离了自然情景,导致运移速率的预测误差超过一个数量级。本研究测量了 P.australis、A. calamus 和 T. latifolia 树冠内以及刚性圆柱体阵列内的床面负荷迁移率,以进行比较。研究还考察了植物形态对植被渠道中床面负荷迁移的影响。在自然形态的树冠内,驱动床面负荷迁移的主要因素是近床湍流动能(TKE),它包括床面产生的湍流和植被产生的湍流。提出了一种方法来预测具有自然形态的树冠内的近床 TKE。在植物固体体积分数相同的情况下,具有自然形态的树冠内的传输速率大于或等于刚性圆柱体阵列内的传输速率,具体取决于植物的形状。这一结果表明,植物形态对植被区内的传输速率有重大影响,不能被忽视,这在实践中是很典型的。根据近床 TKE,对适用于裸河道(无植被)的四个经典床面负荷传输方程(Meyer-Peter-Müller、Einstein、Engelund 和 Dou 方程)进行了修改。将预测的近床 TKE 插入这四个方程中,以预测具有自然形态的树冠中的传输速率。对预测结果的比较表明,Meyer-Peter-Müller 方程在预测植被景观中的输运率方面精度最高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
12.00%
发文量
2374
审稿时长
4.6 months
期刊介绍: Journal of Hydrodynamics is devoted to the publication of original theoretical, computational and experimental contributions to the all aspects of hydrodynamics. It covers advances in the naval architecture and ocean engineering, marine and ocean engineering, environmental engineering, water conservancy and hydropower engineering, energy exploration, chemical engineering, biological and biomedical engineering etc.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信