Board gender diversity and accounting conservatism: the role of corporate social responsibility

IF 5.2 4区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS, FINANCE
Hussain Muhammad, Francesco Paolone, Stefania Migliori
{"title":"Board gender diversity and accounting conservatism: the role of corporate social responsibility","authors":"Hussain Muhammad, Francesco Paolone, Stefania Migliori","doi":"10.1108/sampj-11-2023-0835","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Purpose</h3>\n<p>This paper aims to provide deeper insights into the relationship between board gender diversity (BGD) and accounting conservatism by exploring the mediating role of corporate social responsibility (CSR) underlying this relationship.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\n<p>The authors sample 10,252 firm-year observations from 932 publicly listed firms in 15 European countries over the 2010–2020 period. The authors conduct several models for panel data, applying mediation mechanisms, the Heckman two-stage model and the generalized method of moments and instrumental variable regressions to test the research hypotheses and account for endogeneity problems as well as unobservable heterogeneity.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Findings</h3>\n<p>Based on an integrated theoretical framework that draws insights from agency, resource dependence and stakeholder theories, the authors establish a positive and significant relationship between BGD and accounting conservatism, which is significantly mediated by CSR. The authors provide empirical evidence for the prior inconsistent results on the gender diversity-conservative accounting link and suggest that BGD promotes effective corporate governance and enhances CSR performance, which in turn, leads to higher conservatism in financial reporting.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Practical implications</h3>\n<p>The findings have important implications for regulators, policymakers and managers in understanding the drivers to ensure and control the quality of financial reporting. The results alert firms to the need to focus not only on the importance of BGD but also on CSR activities to ensure higher earnings reporting quality.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Social implications</h3>\n<p>The results are significant in encouraging a higher presence of women on corporate boards, enhancing CSR performance and drawing social attention to mitigating earnings management practices through higher conservatism in financial reporting.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\n<p>This paper recognized a gap in the literature not yet examined and contributed to the body of knowledge through the mediating role of CSR in the relationship between gender diversity and accounting conservatism.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->","PeriodicalId":22143,"journal":{"name":"Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal","volume":"7 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/sampj-11-2023-0835","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

This paper aims to provide deeper insights into the relationship between board gender diversity (BGD) and accounting conservatism by exploring the mediating role of corporate social responsibility (CSR) underlying this relationship.

Design/methodology/approach

The authors sample 10,252 firm-year observations from 932 publicly listed firms in 15 European countries over the 2010–2020 period. The authors conduct several models for panel data, applying mediation mechanisms, the Heckman two-stage model and the generalized method of moments and instrumental variable regressions to test the research hypotheses and account for endogeneity problems as well as unobservable heterogeneity.

Findings

Based on an integrated theoretical framework that draws insights from agency, resource dependence and stakeholder theories, the authors establish a positive and significant relationship between BGD and accounting conservatism, which is significantly mediated by CSR. The authors provide empirical evidence for the prior inconsistent results on the gender diversity-conservative accounting link and suggest that BGD promotes effective corporate governance and enhances CSR performance, which in turn, leads to higher conservatism in financial reporting.

Practical implications

The findings have important implications for regulators, policymakers and managers in understanding the drivers to ensure and control the quality of financial reporting. The results alert firms to the need to focus not only on the importance of BGD but also on CSR activities to ensure higher earnings reporting quality.

Social implications

The results are significant in encouraging a higher presence of women on corporate boards, enhancing CSR performance and drawing social attention to mitigating earnings management practices through higher conservatism in financial reporting.

Originality/value

This paper recognized a gap in the literature not yet examined and contributed to the body of knowledge through the mediating role of CSR in the relationship between gender diversity and accounting conservatism.

董事会性别多样性与会计保守主义:企业社会责任的作用
目的 本文旨在通过探讨企业社会责任(CSR)在这一关系中的中介作用,深入探讨董事会性别多元化(BGD)与会计保守主义之间的关系。作者运用中介机制、赫克曼两阶段模型、广义矩量法和工具变量回归法建立了多个面板数据模型,以检验研究假设,并考虑内生性问题和不可观测的异质性。研究结果作者基于一个综合理论框架,从代理理论、资源依赖理论和利益相关者理论中汲取灵感,在 BGD 与会计保守主义之间建立了显著的正相关关系,而企业社会责任在很大程度上起到了中介作用。作者为之前关于性别多样性与会计保守主义之间联系的不一致结果提供了经验证据,并认为性别多样性促进了有效的公司治理,提高了企业社会责任绩效,而这反过来又导致了财务报告中更高的保守主义。社会意义研究结果对于鼓励更多女性进入公司董事会、提高企业社会责任绩效以及吸引社会关注通过提高财务报告的保守性来减少收益管理做法具有重要意义。原创性/价值本文通过研究企业社会责任在性别多样性与会计保守主义之间关系中的中介作用,发现了文献中尚未研究的空白,并为知识体系做出了贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.50
自引率
6.70%
发文量
38
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信