Quantum Mechanics as a Carnapian Language

Iulian D. Toader
{"title":"Quantum Mechanics as a Carnapian Language","authors":"Iulian D. Toader","doi":"arxiv-2407.07102","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The paper discusses Carnap's claim that a proper philosophical analysis of\nquantum mechanics, including a determination of whether its logic has to be\nrevised, requires a rational reconstruction of the theory. Several\narticulations of the notion of rational reconstruction are recalled, followed\nby a brief analysis of two standard criticisms of Carnap's claim. The paper\nsuggests that adopting inferentialism overcomes both criticisms, and then\nconsiders the possibility of formulating quantum mechanics as a Carnapian\nlanguage with an inferentialist semantics.","PeriodicalId":501042,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - PHYS - History and Philosophy of Physics","volume":"22 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - PHYS - History and Philosophy of Physics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2407.07102","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The paper discusses Carnap's claim that a proper philosophical analysis of quantum mechanics, including a determination of whether its logic has to be revised, requires a rational reconstruction of the theory. Several articulations of the notion of rational reconstruction are recalled, followed by a brief analysis of two standard criticisms of Carnap's claim. The paper suggests that adopting inferentialism overcomes both criticisms, and then considers the possibility of formulating quantum mechanics as a Carnapian language with an inferentialist semantics.
作为卡尔纳普语言的量子力学
本文讨论了卡尔纳普的主张,即对量子力学进行正确的哲学分析,包括确定其逻辑是否必须被修正,需要对该理论进行合理的重建。本文回顾了理性重建概念的几种表述,随后简要分析了对卡尔纳普主张的两种标准批评。论文指出,采用推论主义可以克服这两种批评,然后探讨了将量子力学表述为具有推论主义语义的卡尔纳普语言的可能性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信