In Honor of John L. Esposito

IF 0.2 4区 哲学 0 RELIGION
Seth Ward
{"title":"In Honor of John L. Esposito","authors":"Seth Ward","doi":"10.1353/ecu.2024.a931514","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<span><span>In lieu of</span> an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:</span>\n<p> <ul> <li><!-- html_title --> In Honor of John L. Esposito <!-- /html_title --></li> <li> Seth Ward, <em>(retired)</em> </li> </ul> <p>Readers of this journal are likely to be familiar with John L. Esposito's life and career. In 1974, he earned his Ph.D. from Temple University's Department of Religion, where he got to know Professor Leonard Swidler. Since 2016, Esposito has served on the journal's board and has contributed to the Dialogue Institute as a lecturer for visiting international students and scholars through a State Department-funded program on religious pluralism. A past president of the American Academy of Religion, of the Middle East Studies Association of North America, and of the American Council for the Study of Islamic Societies, he has also been a member of the World Economic Forum's Council of 100 Leaders and of the European Network of Experts on De-Radicalisation. He served as a Senior Scientist for the Gallup Center for Muslim Studies, was appointed by Kofi Annan as an ambassador for the U.N. Alliance of Civilizations, and has served as a consultant to the U.S. Department of State and other agencies, European and Asian governments, corporations, universities, and media worldwide.</p> <p>Professor Esposito's scholarly publications are mostly in the field of Islamic studies, yet he is a Catholic, and his main academic positions have been at Jesuit institutions, first the College of the Holy Cross in Worcester, MA, then Georgetown University in Washington, DC, where he is the founding director of the Alwaleed Center for Muslim-Christian Understanding and the Bridge Initiative: Protecting Pluralism—Ending Islamophobia in the Walsch School of Public Service. His teaching subjects in Religious Studies were a classic example of fields considered to be within the orbit of Oriental Studies: Islam, Hinduism, and Buddhism—yet he is closely associated with the trend of overcoming the real or perceived biases involved in teaching about these religious communities. His name is on dozens of books, some as sole author, such as <em>Islam: The Straight Path</em> and <em>What Everyone</em> <strong>[End Page 263]</strong> <em>Needs to Know about Islam;</em> others as editor-in-chief (including several encyclopedias from Oxford University Press); or as co-author of important works.</p> <p>Esposito has played a central role in the development of the academic study of Islam and in Ecumenical and Religious Studies for decades. In particular, as the final chapter in a book of essays published in his honor, begins, \"Professor John Esposito has dedicated his academic career to defending the place of Muslims and Islam in the modern world, and in the United States.\"<sup>1</sup> Of course, as shown in this work, Esposito's influence extends far beyond that.</p> <p><em>Overcoming Orientalism</em>, edited by Tamara Sonn, honors Esposito by drawing out four conclusions: 1. Religion is a crucial tool for understanding the contemporary world; 2. Islam is not monolithic, and entities claiming they are Islamic (including the \"Islamic State\") do not reflect typical Islamic values; 3. ecumenical and interfaith relations are an important path forward and worthy of study and action; and 4. contemporary generic antagonism toward Islam and Muslims, including in recent European and American politics, may be understood as \"Orientalism 2.0,\" which is reflective of the legacy of European and American biases. The essays in this volume are divided into sections devoted to these four themes of Esposito's immense professional legacy, a fitting and much-deserved honor to this consummate teacher, author, and scholar. Most of the essays note a personal relationship with Esposito or how his vision has informed their conclusions or shaped the scope of their contribution to the volume.</p> <p>Tamara Sonn's important introduction reviews Esposito's career and his history of \"overcoming Orientalism\" that stretches back far earlier than the publication of Edward Said's volume that named the phenomenon, which is necessary reading to gain a sense of the scope of Esposito's achievements.</p> <p>The two essays in the first section address the role of Religious Studies in the contemporary world. Karen Armstrong's essay, \"'After Enlightenment, Return to the Marketplace': The Scholar's Responsibility for a Broken World,\" reviews Second Testament, Hebrew Bible, and qur'ānic materials, mentioning \"traditional ways of studying ancient texts\" within the framework of \"dismantling the Modernist Paradigm,\" although...</p> </p>","PeriodicalId":43047,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF ECUMENICAL STUDIES","volume":"78 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JOURNAL OF ECUMENICAL STUDIES","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/ecu.2024.a931514","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In lieu of an abstract, here is a brief excerpt of the content:

  • In Honor of John L. Esposito
  • Seth Ward, (retired)

Readers of this journal are likely to be familiar with John L. Esposito's life and career. In 1974, he earned his Ph.D. from Temple University's Department of Religion, where he got to know Professor Leonard Swidler. Since 2016, Esposito has served on the journal's board and has contributed to the Dialogue Institute as a lecturer for visiting international students and scholars through a State Department-funded program on religious pluralism. A past president of the American Academy of Religion, of the Middle East Studies Association of North America, and of the American Council for the Study of Islamic Societies, he has also been a member of the World Economic Forum's Council of 100 Leaders and of the European Network of Experts on De-Radicalisation. He served as a Senior Scientist for the Gallup Center for Muslim Studies, was appointed by Kofi Annan as an ambassador for the U.N. Alliance of Civilizations, and has served as a consultant to the U.S. Department of State and other agencies, European and Asian governments, corporations, universities, and media worldwide.

Professor Esposito's scholarly publications are mostly in the field of Islamic studies, yet he is a Catholic, and his main academic positions have been at Jesuit institutions, first the College of the Holy Cross in Worcester, MA, then Georgetown University in Washington, DC, where he is the founding director of the Alwaleed Center for Muslim-Christian Understanding and the Bridge Initiative: Protecting Pluralism—Ending Islamophobia in the Walsch School of Public Service. His teaching subjects in Religious Studies were a classic example of fields considered to be within the orbit of Oriental Studies: Islam, Hinduism, and Buddhism—yet he is closely associated with the trend of overcoming the real or perceived biases involved in teaching about these religious communities. His name is on dozens of books, some as sole author, such as Islam: The Straight Path and What Everyone [End Page 263] Needs to Know about Islam; others as editor-in-chief (including several encyclopedias from Oxford University Press); or as co-author of important works.

Esposito has played a central role in the development of the academic study of Islam and in Ecumenical and Religious Studies for decades. In particular, as the final chapter in a book of essays published in his honor, begins, "Professor John Esposito has dedicated his academic career to defending the place of Muslims and Islam in the modern world, and in the United States."1 Of course, as shown in this work, Esposito's influence extends far beyond that.

Overcoming Orientalism, edited by Tamara Sonn, honors Esposito by drawing out four conclusions: 1. Religion is a crucial tool for understanding the contemporary world; 2. Islam is not monolithic, and entities claiming they are Islamic (including the "Islamic State") do not reflect typical Islamic values; 3. ecumenical and interfaith relations are an important path forward and worthy of study and action; and 4. contemporary generic antagonism toward Islam and Muslims, including in recent European and American politics, may be understood as "Orientalism 2.0," which is reflective of the legacy of European and American biases. The essays in this volume are divided into sections devoted to these four themes of Esposito's immense professional legacy, a fitting and much-deserved honor to this consummate teacher, author, and scholar. Most of the essays note a personal relationship with Esposito or how his vision has informed their conclusions or shaped the scope of their contribution to the volume.

Tamara Sonn's important introduction reviews Esposito's career and his history of "overcoming Orientalism" that stretches back far earlier than the publication of Edward Said's volume that named the phenomenon, which is necessary reading to gain a sense of the scope of Esposito's achievements.

The two essays in the first section address the role of Religious Studies in the contemporary world. Karen Armstrong's essay, "'After Enlightenment, Return to the Marketplace': The Scholar's Responsibility for a Broken World," reviews Second Testament, Hebrew Bible, and qur'ānic materials, mentioning "traditional ways of studying ancient texts" within the framework of "dismantling the Modernist Paradigm," although...

纪念约翰-埃斯波西托
以下是内容的简要摘录,以代替摘要: 纪念约翰-L-埃斯波西托 塞斯-沃德(已退休) 本刊读者可能对约翰-L-埃斯波西托的生平和职业生涯并不陌生。1974 年,他从坦普尔大学宗教系获得博士学位,并在那里结识了伦纳德-斯维德勒(Leonard Swidler)教授。自2016年以来,埃斯波西托一直担任该杂志的董事会成员,并通过国务院资助的宗教多元化项目为对话研究所担任讲师,为来访的国际学生和学者做出贡献。作为美国宗教学会、北美中东研究协会和美国伊斯兰社会研究理事会的前任主席,他还是世界经济论坛百人领袖理事会和欧洲去激进化专家网络的成员。他曾担任盖洛普穆斯林研究中心的高级科学家,被科菲-安南任命为联合国不同文明联盟大使,并曾担任美国国务院和其他机构、欧洲和亚洲政府、公司、大学和世界各地媒体的顾问。埃斯波西托教授的学术著作主要集中在伊斯兰研究领域,但他是一名天主教徒,他的主要学术职务都是在耶稣会机构担任的,先是在马萨诸塞州伍斯特市的圣十字学院,然后是华盛顿特区的乔治敦大学,在那里他是阿尔瓦利德穆斯林-基督教理解中心和桥梁计划的创始主任:他是沃尔什公共服务学院 "保护多元主义--终结伊斯兰恐惧症 "项目的创始主任。他在宗教研究方面的教学科目是被认为属于东方研究范畴的领域的典型例子:伊斯兰教、印度教和佛教--但他与克服在教授这些宗教团体时所涉及的真实或感知的偏见这一趋势密切相关。他的名字出现在数十本书籍中,其中一些是唯一的作者,如《伊斯兰教》(Islam:末页 263]每个人都需要了解伊斯兰教》;其他一些则是主编(包括牛津大学出版社出版的几本百科全书),或者是重要著作的合著者。几十年来,埃斯波西托在伊斯兰教学术研究以及普世和宗教研究的发展中发挥了核心作用。特别是,正如为纪念他而出版的一本论文集的最后一章开头所说:"约翰-埃斯波西托教授将自己的学术生涯奉献给了捍卫穆斯林和伊斯兰教在现代世界和美国的地位。塔玛拉-松恩主编的《克服东方主义》一书通过得出四个结论来纪念埃斯波西托:1.宗教是理解当代世界的重要工具;2.伊斯兰教并非铁板一块,声称自己是伊斯兰教的实体(包括 "伊斯兰国")并不反映典型的伊斯兰价值观;3.普世教会和宗教间关系是一条重要的前进道路,值得研究和行动;4.当代对伊斯兰教和穆斯林的普遍敌视,包括在最近的欧洲和美国政治中,可以理解为 "东方主义 2.0",它反映了欧洲和美国遗留下来的偏见。本卷中的文章分为几个部分,专门讨论埃斯波西托巨大职业遗产中的这四个主题,这是对这位完美的教师、作家和学者当之无愧的崇高敬意。大多数文章都提到了与埃斯波西托的私人关系,或埃斯波西托的观点如何影响了他们的结论,或如何决定了他们在本卷中的贡献范围。塔玛拉-桑恩(Tamara Sonn)的重要导言回顾了埃斯波西托的职业生涯及其 "克服东方主义 "的历史,其历史远远早于爱德华-萨义德(Edward Said)命名东方主义现象的著作的出版时间。第一部分的两篇文章探讨了宗教研究在当代世界中的作用。凯伦-阿姆斯特朗(Karen Armstrong)的文章"'启蒙之后,回归市场':学者对破碎世界的责任 "一文回顾了《第二约》、《希伯来圣经》和《古兰经》的材料,在 "拆除现代主义范式 "的框架内提到了 "研究古代文本的传统方法",尽管...
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
33
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信