Evaluation of meadow fescue grass cultivars seeded with alfalfa in New York state

IF 0.8 Q3 AGRONOMY
Rink Tacoma-Fogal, Jerome H. Cherney, Debbie J. R. Cherney
{"title":"Evaluation of meadow fescue grass cultivars seeded with alfalfa in New York state","authors":"Rink Tacoma-Fogal,&nbsp;Jerome H. Cherney,&nbsp;Debbie J. R. Cherney","doi":"10.1002/cft2.20295","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Alfalfa–grass mixtures sown in the northeastern United States provide high-quality dairy forage, and meadow fescue (<i>Festuca pratensis</i> Huds.) may improve the quality of these mixtures. Our objectives were to evaluate competitiveness and nutritive value of nine meadow fescue (MF) cultivars in New York State at spring harvest. Three farms, two in central New York State and one in northern New York state, were used. Conventional alfalfa (<i>Medicago sativa L</i>.) was sown (15 lb acre<sup>−1</sup>) to nine MF cultivars (three tetraploid and six diploid) and one tall fescue <i>Lolium arundinaceum</i> (Schreb.) ‘Darbysh’ cultivar in a randomized complete block design with four field replicates at each field site at three seeding rates (1, 2, and 3 lb acre<sup>−1</sup>). Grass proportion in mixtures was estimated visually. Grass samples were collected shortly before first harvest and analyzed for neutral detergent fiber, neutral detergent fiber digestibility (NDFD), acid detergent fiber, in vitro digestibility, and crude protein. Most meadow fescue cultivars maintained a grass proportion between 20%–45% across farms and growing seasons when seeded at 1lb acre<sup>−1</sup>. Seeding rates above 1lb acre<sup>−1</sup> resulted in grass proportions above the recommended 20–30% grass proportion rate. Drought in early 2022 resulted in an average drop in grass percentage of 16.9% units for meadow fescue in mixtures, compared to 2021. Nutritive value of cultivars varied among farms and over growing seasons. Meadow fescue cultivars averaged 2.7% units higher NDFD than tall fescue, and cultivars with consistently high NDFD were Hidden Valley, SW Revansch, SW Minto, and Schwetra. Tetraploid cultivars averaged 4.0% units lower NDF compared to diploid cultivars, which is very advantageous for grass in alfalfa–grass mixtures.</p>","PeriodicalId":10931,"journal":{"name":"Crop, Forage and Turfgrass Management","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Crop, Forage and Turfgrass Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cft2.20295","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Alfalfa–grass mixtures sown in the northeastern United States provide high-quality dairy forage, and meadow fescue (Festuca pratensis Huds.) may improve the quality of these mixtures. Our objectives were to evaluate competitiveness and nutritive value of nine meadow fescue (MF) cultivars in New York State at spring harvest. Three farms, two in central New York State and one in northern New York state, were used. Conventional alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) was sown (15 lb acre−1) to nine MF cultivars (three tetraploid and six diploid) and one tall fescue Lolium arundinaceum (Schreb.) ‘Darbysh’ cultivar in a randomized complete block design with four field replicates at each field site at three seeding rates (1, 2, and 3 lb acre−1). Grass proportion in mixtures was estimated visually. Grass samples were collected shortly before first harvest and analyzed for neutral detergent fiber, neutral detergent fiber digestibility (NDFD), acid detergent fiber, in vitro digestibility, and crude protein. Most meadow fescue cultivars maintained a grass proportion between 20%–45% across farms and growing seasons when seeded at 1lb acre−1. Seeding rates above 1lb acre−1 resulted in grass proportions above the recommended 20–30% grass proportion rate. Drought in early 2022 resulted in an average drop in grass percentage of 16.9% units for meadow fescue in mixtures, compared to 2021. Nutritive value of cultivars varied among farms and over growing seasons. Meadow fescue cultivars averaged 2.7% units higher NDFD than tall fescue, and cultivars with consistently high NDFD were Hidden Valley, SW Revansch, SW Minto, and Schwetra. Tetraploid cultivars averaged 4.0% units lower NDF compared to diploid cultivars, which is very advantageous for grass in alfalfa–grass mixtures.

对纽约州播种紫花苜蓿的草地羊茅品种进行评估
在美国东北部播种的紫花苜蓿-禾本科混合物可提供优质的奶牛饲草,而草甸羊茅(Festuca pratensis Huds.)我们的目标是评估纽约州九种草地羊茅(MF)栽培品种在春季收获时的竞争力和营养价值。我们使用了三个农场,两个位于纽约州中部,一个位于纽约州北部。在随机完全区组设计中,常规紫花苜蓿(Medicago sativa L.)与九个 MF 栽培品种(三个四倍体和六个二倍体)和一个高羊茅 Lolium arundinaceum (Schreb.) 'Darbysh'栽培品种混合播种(15 磅/英亩-1),每个田块有四个田间重复,播种率为三种(1、2 和 3 磅/英亩-1)。混合物中草的比例通过目测估算。在第一次收割前不久采集草样,分析中性洗涤纤维、中性洗涤纤维消化率(NDFD)、酸性洗涤纤维、体外消化率和粗蛋白。当播种量为 1lb acre-1 时,大多数草地羊茅栽培品种在不同农场和生长季节的草地比例保持在 20%-45% 之间。播种率超过 1 磅英亩-1 时,草地比例高于建议的 20%-30% 草地比例。与 2021 年相比,2022 年初的干旱导致混播草地羊茅的草地比例平均下降了 16.9%。不同农场和不同生长季节的栽培品种营养价值各不相同。草地羊茅栽培品种的 NDFD 平均比高羊茅高 2.7 个单位,NDFD 始终较高的栽培品种有 Hidden Valley、SW Revansch、SW Minto 和 Schwetra。四倍体栽培品种的 NDF 平均值比二倍体栽培品种低 4.0%,这对苜蓿-禾本科混播中的牧草非常有利。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Crop, Forage and Turfgrass Management
Crop, Forage and Turfgrass Management Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Agronomy and Crop Science
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
16.70%
发文量
49
期刊介绍: Crop, Forage & Turfgrass Management is a peer-reviewed, international, electronic journal covering all aspects of applied crop, forage and grazinglands, and turfgrass management. The journal serves the professions related to the management of crops, forages and grazinglands, and turfgrass by publishing research, briefs, reviews, perspectives, and diagnostic and management guides that are beneficial to researchers, practitioners, educators, and industry representatives.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信