Ethical Decision-Making Among Nurses Participating in Social Media: A Grounded Theory Study

IF 4.2 4区 医学 Q1 NURSING
Melissa A. Lynn PhD, RN, CMSRN, CHSE (assistant professor), Christa Cook PhD, RN, PHNA-BC (Associate Professor), Donna Felber Neff PhD, RN, FNAP (professor), Elizabeth V. Kinchen PhD, RN, AHN-BC (associate professor), Jonathan Beever PhD (associate professor)
{"title":"Ethical Decision-Making Among Nurses Participating in Social Media: A Grounded Theory Study","authors":"Melissa A. Lynn PhD, RN, CMSRN, CHSE (assistant professor),&nbsp;Christa Cook PhD, RN, PHNA-BC (Associate Professor),&nbsp;Donna Felber Neff PhD, RN, FNAP (professor),&nbsp;Elizabeth V. Kinchen PhD, RN, AHN-BC (associate professor),&nbsp;Jonathan Beever PhD (associate professor)","doi":"10.1016/S2155-8256(24)00055-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Nurses use social media for both professional and personal purposes, but even personal posts that can be misconstrued or violate patient privacy can lead to severe consequences for nurses. To help nurses in preventing such social media errors, it is essential to understand how nurses make ethical choices when posting on various social media platforms.</p></div><div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>The objective was to uncover nurses’ decision-making process in evaluating ethical choices when participating in social media through the identification of influencing situational factors, their consideration of professional boundaries, and their current understanding of professional expectations.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A qualitative grounded theory approach was utilized. The organizing theory was Schwartz’s Integrated Ethical Decision Making. Participants were recruited through Facebook, X (formerly Twitter), and LinkedIn. After completing a short survey to verify that participants met inclusion criteria, 21 participants were interviewed via video conferencing or telephone using a semi-structured interview technique. All participants reported that they were registered nurses currently practicing in an inpatient hospital setting in the United States.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Nurses are multidimensional individuals with different personalities and motivations for participating in social media. Professional obligations, employer policies, and Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act regulations trigger fear of repercussions or ramifications for content included in social media. Knowledge of social media expectations helps elicit a healthy balance between motivations for interacting with others via social media and fearing any negative outcomes. Experiencing outcomes, whether personal or observed, impacts how the nurse continues to make decisions about interacting on social media.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Nurses have different levels of understanding of what is acceptable and not acceptable, and this study emphasizes the need to educate nurses regarding professional guidelines, expectations, laws, and employer policies.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":46153,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Nursing Regulation","volume":"15 2","pages":"Pages 45-56"},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Nursing Regulation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2155825624000553","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Nurses use social media for both professional and personal purposes, but even personal posts that can be misconstrued or violate patient privacy can lead to severe consequences for nurses. To help nurses in preventing such social media errors, it is essential to understand how nurses make ethical choices when posting on various social media platforms.

Purpose

The objective was to uncover nurses’ decision-making process in evaluating ethical choices when participating in social media through the identification of influencing situational factors, their consideration of professional boundaries, and their current understanding of professional expectations.

Methods

A qualitative grounded theory approach was utilized. The organizing theory was Schwartz’s Integrated Ethical Decision Making. Participants were recruited through Facebook, X (formerly Twitter), and LinkedIn. After completing a short survey to verify that participants met inclusion criteria, 21 participants were interviewed via video conferencing or telephone using a semi-structured interview technique. All participants reported that they were registered nurses currently practicing in an inpatient hospital setting in the United States.

Results

Nurses are multidimensional individuals with different personalities and motivations for participating in social media. Professional obligations, employer policies, and Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act regulations trigger fear of repercussions or ramifications for content included in social media. Knowledge of social media expectations helps elicit a healthy balance between motivations for interacting with others via social media and fearing any negative outcomes. Experiencing outcomes, whether personal or observed, impacts how the nurse continues to make decisions about interacting on social media.

Conclusion

Nurses have different levels of understanding of what is acceptable and not acceptable, and this study emphasizes the need to educate nurses regarding professional guidelines, expectations, laws, and employer policies.

参与社交媒体的护士的伦理决策:基础理论研究
背景护士出于职业和个人目的使用社交媒体,但即使是可能被误解或侵犯患者隐私的个人帖子也会给护士带来严重后果。为了帮助护士预防此类社交媒体错误,有必要了解护士在各种社交媒体平台上发布信息时是如何做出道德选择的。目的 通过识别影响情境的因素、护士对职业界限的考虑以及护士目前对职业期望的理解,揭示护士在参与社交媒体时评估道德选择的决策过程。组织理论是 Schwartz 的 "综合伦理决策"。参与者是通过 Facebook、X(前 Twitter)和 LinkedIn 招募的。在完成简短的调查以确认参与者符合纳入标准后,21 名参与者通过视频会议或电话接受了半结构化访谈技术的访谈。所有参与者都称自己是注册护士,目前在美国一家住院医院工作。职业义务、雇主政策以及《健康保险可携性和责任法案》(Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act)等法规引发了对社交媒体内容所带来的影响或后果的恐惧。对社交媒体期望的了解有助于在通过社交媒体与他人互动的动机和对任何负面结果的恐惧之间取得健康的平衡。护士对什么是可接受的、什么是不可接受的有不同程度的理解,本研究强调有必要对护士进行有关职业准则、期望、法律和雇主政策的教育。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
12.50%
发文量
50
审稿时长
54 days
期刊介绍: Journal of Nursing Regulation (JNR), the official journal of the National Council of State Boards of Nursing (NCSBN®), is a quarterly, peer-reviewed, academic and professional journal. It publishes scholarly articles that advance the science of nursing regulation, promote the mission and vision of NCSBN, and enhance communication and collaboration among nurse regulators, educators, practitioners, and the scientific community. The journal supports evidence-based regulation, addresses issues related to patient safety, and highlights current nursing regulatory issues, programs, and projects in both the United States and the international community. In publishing JNR, NCSBN''s goal is to develop and share knowledge related to nursing and other healthcare regulation across continents and to promote a greater awareness of regulatory issues among all nurses.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信