Dual-Task Effect on Center of Pressure Oscillations and Prefrontal Cortex Activation Between Young and Older Adults.

Jiahao Pan, Shuqi Zhang
{"title":"Dual-Task Effect on Center of Pressure Oscillations and Prefrontal Cortex Activation Between Young and Older Adults.","authors":"Jiahao Pan, Shuqi Zhang","doi":"10.1080/02701367.2024.2365940","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Purpose</b>: This study aimed to investigate the dual-task effect on conventional center of pressure (CoP) outcomes, CoP oscillations, and prefrontal cortex (PFC) activation between young and older adults. <b>Methods</b>: Fourteen healthy older adults (age: 66.25 ± 3.43 years) and another fourteen gender-matched young adults (age: 19.80 ± 0.75 years) participated in this study. Participants completed single-task and dual-task standing trials in a fixed order. The displacement of CoP and PFC activation were recorded using a Force plate and a functional near-infrared spectroscopy system, respectively. Two-way MANOVAs were used to examine the group and task effects. Additionally, the Pearson correlation analyses were used to investigate the relationship between CoP oscillations and PFC activation. <b>Results</b>: Our results showed a worse balance performance, greater CoP oscillations of 0-0.1 (11.03 ± 8.24 vs. 23.20 ± 12.54 cm<sup>2</sup>) and 0.1-0.5 (13.62 ± 9.30 vs. 30.00 ± 23.12 cm<sup>2</sup>) Hz in the medial-lateral direction and higher right (dorsomedial: -0.0003 ± 0.021 vs. 0.021 ± 0.021 & ventrolateral: 0.0087 ± 0.047 vs. 0.025 ± 0.045 mol/ml) and left (dorsomedial: 0.0033 ± 0.024 vs. 0.020 ± 0.025 & ventrolateral: 0.0060 ± 0.037 vs. 0.034 ± 0.037 mol/ml) PFC activation in response to a secondary cognitive task in older adults (<i>p</i> < .05). Older adults also showed significant positive correlations between CoP oscillations in the anterior-posterior direction and PFC activation under the single-task standing. <b>Conclusion</b>: These results suggest that older adults presented a loss of postural automaticity contributing to cognitive dysfunction. Moreover, heightened CoP oscillations at 0-0.5 Hz in response to a secondary cognitive task could provide evidence of a loss of automaticity, which might be associated with a greater reliance on the sensory inputs.</p>","PeriodicalId":94191,"journal":{"name":"Research quarterly for exercise and sport","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research quarterly for exercise and sport","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02701367.2024.2365940","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: This study aimed to investigate the dual-task effect on conventional center of pressure (CoP) outcomes, CoP oscillations, and prefrontal cortex (PFC) activation between young and older adults. Methods: Fourteen healthy older adults (age: 66.25 ± 3.43 years) and another fourteen gender-matched young adults (age: 19.80 ± 0.75 years) participated in this study. Participants completed single-task and dual-task standing trials in a fixed order. The displacement of CoP and PFC activation were recorded using a Force plate and a functional near-infrared spectroscopy system, respectively. Two-way MANOVAs were used to examine the group and task effects. Additionally, the Pearson correlation analyses were used to investigate the relationship between CoP oscillations and PFC activation. Results: Our results showed a worse balance performance, greater CoP oscillations of 0-0.1 (11.03 ± 8.24 vs. 23.20 ± 12.54 cm2) and 0.1-0.5 (13.62 ± 9.30 vs. 30.00 ± 23.12 cm2) Hz in the medial-lateral direction and higher right (dorsomedial: -0.0003 ± 0.021 vs. 0.021 ± 0.021 & ventrolateral: 0.0087 ± 0.047 vs. 0.025 ± 0.045 mol/ml) and left (dorsomedial: 0.0033 ± 0.024 vs. 0.020 ± 0.025 & ventrolateral: 0.0060 ± 0.037 vs. 0.034 ± 0.037 mol/ml) PFC activation in response to a secondary cognitive task in older adults (p < .05). Older adults also showed significant positive correlations between CoP oscillations in the anterior-posterior direction and PFC activation under the single-task standing. Conclusion: These results suggest that older adults presented a loss of postural automaticity contributing to cognitive dysfunction. Moreover, heightened CoP oscillations at 0-0.5 Hz in response to a secondary cognitive task could provide evidence of a loss of automaticity, which might be associated with a greater reliance on the sensory inputs.

双重任务对年轻人和老年人压力中心振荡和前额叶皮层激活的影响。
目的:本研究旨在调查双重任务对年轻人和老年人常规压力中心(CoP)结果、CoP 振荡和前额叶皮层(PFC)激活的影响。研究方法14 名健康的老年人(年龄:66.25 ± 3.43 岁)和另外 14 名性别匹配的年轻人(年龄:19.80 ± 0.75 岁)参加了本研究。参与者按照固定顺序完成单任务和双任务站立试验。分别使用力板和功能性近红外光谱系统记录了CoP和PFC激活的位移。采用双向 MANOVA 检验了组间效应和任务效应。此外,还使用了皮尔逊相关分析来研究 CoP 振荡与 PFC 激活之间的关系。结果我们的研究结果表明,受试者的平衡能力较差,CoP振荡在内侧-外侧方向分别为0-0.1(11.03 ± 8.24 vs. 23.20 ± 12.54 cm2)和0.1-0.5(13.62 ± 9.30 vs. 30.00 ± 23.12 cm2)赫兹,右侧(背内侧:-0.0003 ± 0.0.0赫兹)和右侧(背外侧:-0.0003 ± 0.0赫兹)较高:-0.021 ± 0.021 和腹外侧:0.0087 ± 0.047 vs. 0.025 ± 0.045 mol/ml)和左侧(背内侧:0.0033 ± 0.024 mol/ml)较高:0.0033 ± 0.024 vs. 0.020 ± 0.025 & 腹外侧:0.0060 ± 0.037 vs. 0.034 ± 0.037 mol/ml)的 PFC 激活(p 结论:这些结果表明,老年人的姿势自动性丧失会导致认知功能障碍。此外,对次级认知任务做出反应时,0-0.5 Hz 的 CoP 振荡增强可提供自动性丧失的证据,这可能与更加依赖感觉输入有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信