Rural community-centred co-planning for sustainable rural health systems

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q2 NURSING
Nerida Hyett PhD, Mandy Hutchinson Grad Cert, Donna Doyle Post Grad Healthcare Leadership, Trevor Adem MBA, Dallas Coghill Grad Dip Critical Care, Pamela Harvey PhD, Catherine Lees PhD, Belinda O'Sullivan PhD
{"title":"Rural community-centred co-planning for sustainable rural health systems","authors":"Nerida Hyett PhD,&nbsp;Mandy Hutchinson Grad Cert,&nbsp;Donna Doyle Post Grad Healthcare Leadership,&nbsp;Trevor Adem MBA,&nbsp;Dallas Coghill Grad Dip Critical Care,&nbsp;Pamela Harvey PhD,&nbsp;Catherine Lees PhD,&nbsp;Belinda O'Sullivan PhD","doi":"10.1111/ajr.13162","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>Sustaining rural healthcare services is challenging because of numerous systemic factors. Rural communities can inform the design of sustainable rural health models; however, further evidence of effective co-design is needed to guide implementation. The study aim was to co-design a series of place-based and evidence-informed rural health models, to improve local health system sustainability.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Setting</h3>\n \n <p>A rural region (categorised as Modified Monash Model 5) defined by three adjoining Shires in Central and Northwest Victoria, Australia.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Participants</h3>\n \n <p>A health executive co-planning network led the co-design, with input and oversight from a broader cross-sector group. Healthcare professionals (<i>n</i> = 44) and consumers and carers (<i>n</i> = 21) participated in interviews, and an online survey was completed by healthcare professionals (<i>n</i> = 11) and consumers and carers (<i>n</i> = 7) to provide feedback on the preliminary results.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Design</h3>\n \n <p>Community-based participatory action research was applied incorporating co-design methods and systems thinking. Data were collected through qualitative interviews followed by an online feedback survey. Mixed method data analysis (QUAL-quant) was conducted with qualitative directed content analysis of interview transcripts and quantitative descriptive analyses of survey responses to aid prioritisation.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Healthcare priorities, strengths and challenges, and proposed rural health models are described. A rural health system sustainability strategy was developed with three integrated pillars: 1. Workforce strengthening, 2. Integrated health services and 3. Innovative models of care.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Community-centred co-design with rural health stakeholders was effective for generating locally tailored ideas and potential health models that emulate community strengths and resources, and provide a foundation for further planning, implementation and evaluation.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":55421,"journal":{"name":"Australian Journal of Rural Health","volume":"32 5","pages":"944-958"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ajr.13162","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Journal of Rural Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ajr.13162","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

Sustaining rural healthcare services is challenging because of numerous systemic factors. Rural communities can inform the design of sustainable rural health models; however, further evidence of effective co-design is needed to guide implementation. The study aim was to co-design a series of place-based and evidence-informed rural health models, to improve local health system sustainability.

Setting

A rural region (categorised as Modified Monash Model 5) defined by three adjoining Shires in Central and Northwest Victoria, Australia.

Participants

A health executive co-planning network led the co-design, with input and oversight from a broader cross-sector group. Healthcare professionals (n = 44) and consumers and carers (n = 21) participated in interviews, and an online survey was completed by healthcare professionals (n = 11) and consumers and carers (n = 7) to provide feedback on the preliminary results.

Design

Community-based participatory action research was applied incorporating co-design methods and systems thinking. Data were collected through qualitative interviews followed by an online feedback survey. Mixed method data analysis (QUAL-quant) was conducted with qualitative directed content analysis of interview transcripts and quantitative descriptive analyses of survey responses to aid prioritisation.

Results

Healthcare priorities, strengths and challenges, and proposed rural health models are described. A rural health system sustainability strategy was developed with three integrated pillars: 1. Workforce strengthening, 2. Integrated health services and 3. Innovative models of care.

Conclusion

Community-centred co-design with rural health stakeholders was effective for generating locally tailored ideas and potential health models that emulate community strengths and resources, and provide a foundation for further planning, implementation and evaluation.

以农村社区为中心,共同规划可持续的农村医疗系统。
目的:由于诸多系统性因素,农村医疗服务的可持续发展具有挑战性。农村社区可以为可持续农村医疗模式的设计提供信息;但是,还需要更多有效共同设计的证据来指导实施。本研究旨在共同设计一系列以地方为基础、以证据为依据的农村医疗模式,以改善当地医疗系统的可持续性:研究地点:澳大利亚维多利亚州中部和西北部的一个农村地区(被归类为 "莫纳什模式 5"),该地区由三个相邻的郡组成:卫生行政人员共同规划网络领导共同设计工作,更广泛的跨部门小组提供意见和监督。医疗保健专业人员(44 人)、消费者和护理人员(21 人)参加了访谈,医疗保健专业人员(11 人)、消费者和护理人员(7 人)完成了在线调查,就初步结果提供反馈:设计:采用基于社区的参与式行动研究,并融入共同设计方法和系统思维。通过定性访谈收集数据,然后进行在线反馈调查。采用混合方法进行数据分析(QUAL-quant),对访谈记录进行定性内容分析,对调查反馈进行定量描述性分析,以帮助确定优先事项:结果:描述了医疗保健的优先事项、优势和挑战以及拟议的农村医疗保健模式。制定了农村医疗系统可持续发展战略,包括三个综合支柱:1.加强劳动力,2. 综合医疗服务,3.创新医疗模式:结论:以社区为中心,与农村卫生利益相关者共同设计,能有效地产生适合当地情况的想法和潜在的卫生模式,这些想法和模式可借鉴社区的优势和资源,并为进一步的规划、实施和评估奠定基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Australian Journal of Rural Health
Australian Journal of Rural Health 医学-公共卫生、环境卫生与职业卫生
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
16.70%
发文量
122
审稿时长
12 months
期刊介绍: The Australian Journal of Rural Health publishes articles in the field of rural health. It facilitates the formation of interdisciplinary networks, so that rural health professionals can form a cohesive group and work together for the advancement of rural practice, in all health disciplines. The Journal aims to establish a national and international reputation for the quality of its scholarly discourse and its value to rural health professionals. All articles, unless otherwise identified, are peer reviewed by at least two researchers expert in the field of the submitted paper.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信