Behavioral Intervention that Extends Sleep Duration Leads to Greater Self-Control in School-Aged Children.

IF 1.8 3区 医学 Q3 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES
Andrea M Spaeth, Nicola L Hawley, Mary A Carskadon, Hollie A Raynor, Elissa Jelalian, Judith A Owens, Rena R Wing, Chantelle N Hart
{"title":"Behavioral Intervention that Extends Sleep Duration Leads to Greater Self-Control in School-Aged Children.","authors":"Andrea M Spaeth, Nicola L Hawley, Mary A Carskadon, Hollie A Raynor, Elissa Jelalian, Judith A Owens, Rena R Wing, Chantelle N Hart","doi":"10.1097/DBP.0000000000001303","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Short sleep and evening phase preference associate with impaired self-control, yet few studies have assessed the efficacy of sleep extension for improving this behavioral domain. Thus, this secondary analysis of a behavioral sleep intervention measured whether an intervention that enhanced children's sleep also affected self-control. Differences by chronotype were also explored.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Sixty-seven children (8-11 yr), who reportedly slept <9.5 hr/d, were randomized to either a control or sleep intervention condition (i.e., 4-session behavioral intervention to enhance sleep by 1-1.5 hr/night). Chronotype was assessed using the Child Chronotype Questionnaire at baseline, and self-control was assessed using the Self-Control Rating Scale (SCRS, a caregiver report) at baseline and 8 weeks postrandomization. Total sleep time (TST) was measured using wrist actigraphy for 1 week at both baseline and 8 weeks postrandomization. Partial correlations and mixed-model ANOVAs were used for statistical analyses, with age as a covariate.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At baseline, children with shorter TST (r = -0.29, p = 0.02) and an evening preference (r = 0.26, p = 0.049) were perceived as having lower self-control by their caregivers. Significant condition*time interaction effects were found for TST ( p < 0.001) and SCRS score ( p = 0.046): From baseline to follow-up, children randomized to the sleep intervention exhibited a significant increase in TST and were perceived as having greater self-control by their caregiver; children randomized to the control condition exhibited no change in TST or in SCRS score. The condition*chronotype*time interaction effect was not significant.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A brief sleep intervention that enhanced TST also resulted in enhanced caregiver reported self-control in school-age children. Results add to the growing evidence for the importance of sleep health in children.</p>","PeriodicalId":50215,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics","volume":" ","pages":"e463-e469"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11483195/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/DBP.0000000000001303","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Short sleep and evening phase preference associate with impaired self-control, yet few studies have assessed the efficacy of sleep extension for improving this behavioral domain. Thus, this secondary analysis of a behavioral sleep intervention measured whether an intervention that enhanced children's sleep also affected self-control. Differences by chronotype were also explored.

Methods: Sixty-seven children (8-11 yr), who reportedly slept <9.5 hr/d, were randomized to either a control or sleep intervention condition (i.e., 4-session behavioral intervention to enhance sleep by 1-1.5 hr/night). Chronotype was assessed using the Child Chronotype Questionnaire at baseline, and self-control was assessed using the Self-Control Rating Scale (SCRS, a caregiver report) at baseline and 8 weeks postrandomization. Total sleep time (TST) was measured using wrist actigraphy for 1 week at both baseline and 8 weeks postrandomization. Partial correlations and mixed-model ANOVAs were used for statistical analyses, with age as a covariate.

Results: At baseline, children with shorter TST (r = -0.29, p = 0.02) and an evening preference (r = 0.26, p = 0.049) were perceived as having lower self-control by their caregivers. Significant condition*time interaction effects were found for TST ( p < 0.001) and SCRS score ( p = 0.046): From baseline to follow-up, children randomized to the sleep intervention exhibited a significant increase in TST and were perceived as having greater self-control by their caregiver; children randomized to the control condition exhibited no change in TST or in SCRS score. The condition*chronotype*time interaction effect was not significant.

Conclusion: A brief sleep intervention that enhanced TST also resulted in enhanced caregiver reported self-control in school-age children. Results add to the growing evidence for the importance of sleep health in children.

延长睡眠时间的行为干预可提高学龄儿童的自控能力。
研究目的睡眠时间短和晚期偏好与自我控制能力受损有关,但很少有研究评估延长睡眠时间对改善这一行为领域的效果。因此,本研究对一项行为睡眠干预措施进行了二次分析,以衡量增强儿童睡眠的干预措施是否也会影响自控能力。同时还探讨了不同时间型的差异:方法:67 名儿童(8-11 岁),报告睡眠结果:基线时,TST(r = -0.29,p = 0.02)较短和偏好晚间睡眠(r = 0.26,p = 0.049)的儿童被其看护人认为自我控制能力较低。在 TST(p < 0.001)和 SCRS 分数(p = 0.046)方面,发现了明显的条件*时间交互效应:从基线到随访,随机接受睡眠干预的儿童的 TST 显著增加,而且他们的看护人认为他们有更强的自我控制能力;随机接受对照条件的儿童的 TST 和 SCRS 分数没有变化。条件*时型*时间的交互效应不显著:结论:简短的睡眠干预能增强学龄儿童的TST,同时也能增强照顾者报告的自控力。这些结果为儿童睡眠健康的重要性提供了越来越多的证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
8.30%
发文量
155
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Developmental & Behavioral Pediatrics (JDBP) is a leading resource for clinicians, teachers, and researchers involved in pediatric healthcare and child development. This important journal covers some of the most challenging issues affecting child development and behavior.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信