Improving Neonatal Resuscitation Knowledge in Advanced Providers Through Simulation: A Quality Improvement Project.

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q2 NURSING
Advances in Neonatal Care Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-08-27 DOI:10.1097/ANC.0000000000001187
Tory Snarr, Randee Masciola, Christine Sayre, Elizabeth Sharpe
{"title":"Improving Neonatal Resuscitation Knowledge in Advanced Providers Through Simulation: A Quality Improvement Project.","authors":"Tory Snarr, Randee Masciola, Christine Sayre, Elizabeth Sharpe","doi":"10.1097/ANC.0000000000001187","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Advanced neonatal resuscitation events are high-risk, low-volume critical situations. Healthcare systems have placed emphasis on improving resuscitation skills for advanced providers based on evidence showing that it can directly impact patient outcomes. Neonatal resuscitation program (NRP) renewal is only required every 2 years. This gap and low usage of skills can result in lack of competency and expertise leading to an increased risk of poor patient outcomes.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This project aimed to provide simulation education based on NRP curriculum for a large group of advanced providers at multiple level II, III, and IV neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) and to improve confidence and knowledge in advanced resuscitation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A high-fidelity mannequin was used to simulate a reproducible, critical scenario that spanned the entire NRP algorithm. NRP knowledge and the effectiveness of simulation on confidence and knowledge in neonatal resuscitation were measured.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The average knowledge score from the pretest to the posttest improved by 7%. Based on the simulation evaluation tool-modified (SET-M), debriefing was the most effective in improving confidence and knowledge. The neonatal nurse practitioners (NNPs) with the most years of clinical experience had the largest improvement in knowledge.</p><p><strong>Implications for practice and research: </strong>With the most experienced NNPs providing majority of coverage in the Level II NICUs, a correlation may be drawn that the effect of simulations on NRP knowledge has a greater impact on these groups due to the low exposure of advanced resuscitation events at these sites. Debriefing stood out as the most critical component of simulation.</p>","PeriodicalId":48862,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Neonatal Care","volume":" ","pages":"435-441"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Neonatal Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/ANC.0000000000001187","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/8/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Advanced neonatal resuscitation events are high-risk, low-volume critical situations. Healthcare systems have placed emphasis on improving resuscitation skills for advanced providers based on evidence showing that it can directly impact patient outcomes. Neonatal resuscitation program (NRP) renewal is only required every 2 years. This gap and low usage of skills can result in lack of competency and expertise leading to an increased risk of poor patient outcomes.

Purpose: This project aimed to provide simulation education based on NRP curriculum for a large group of advanced providers at multiple level II, III, and IV neonatal intensive care units (NICUs) and to improve confidence and knowledge in advanced resuscitation.

Methods: A high-fidelity mannequin was used to simulate a reproducible, critical scenario that spanned the entire NRP algorithm. NRP knowledge and the effectiveness of simulation on confidence and knowledge in neonatal resuscitation were measured.

Results: The average knowledge score from the pretest to the posttest improved by 7%. Based on the simulation evaluation tool-modified (SET-M), debriefing was the most effective in improving confidence and knowledge. The neonatal nurse practitioners (NNPs) with the most years of clinical experience had the largest improvement in knowledge.

Implications for practice and research: With the most experienced NNPs providing majority of coverage in the Level II NICUs, a correlation may be drawn that the effect of simulations on NRP knowledge has a greater impact on these groups due to the low exposure of advanced resuscitation events at these sites. Debriefing stood out as the most critical component of simulation.

通过模拟提高高级医疗人员的新生儿复苏知识:质量改进项目。
背景:新生儿高级复苏事件是一种高风险、低容量的危急情况。有证据表明,高级医疗服务提供者的复苏技能可直接影响患者的预后,因此医疗保健系统将重点放在了提高高级医疗服务提供者的复苏技能上。新生儿复苏计划 (NRP) 每两年才需要更新一次。目的:该项目旨在为多个二级、三级和四级新生儿重症监护病房(NICU)的大批高级医疗人员提供基于 NRP 课程的模拟教育,并提高他们对高级复苏术的信心和知识:方法:使用高仿真人体模型模拟可重现的关键情景,该情景涵盖整个 NRP 算法。方法:使用高仿真人体模型模拟可重现的危急情景,该情景涵盖了整个 NRP 算法,对 NRP 知识以及模拟对新生儿复苏信心和知识的有效性进行了测量:结果:从测试前到测试后,平均知识得分提高了 7%。根据模拟评估工具(SET-M),汇报对提高信心和知识最有效。临床经验最丰富的新生儿执业护士(NNPs)在知识方面的进步最大:实践与研究的启示:二级新生儿重症监护室的大部分工作都由经验最丰富的新生儿执业护士承担,因此可以得出这样的结论:由于在这些机构很少发生高级复苏事件,模拟训练对新生儿执业护士知识的影响对这些群体的影响更大。汇报是模拟教学最重要的组成部分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
5.90%
发文量
101
期刊介绍: Advances in Neonatal Care takes a unique and dynamic approach to the original research and clinical practice articles it publishes. Addressing the practice challenges faced every day—caring for the 40,000-plus low-birth-weight infants in Level II and Level III NICUs each year—the journal promotes evidence-based care and improved outcomes for the tiniest patients and their families. Peer-reviewed editorial includes unique and detailed visual and teaching aids, such as Family Teaching Toolbox, Research to Practice, Cultivating Clinical Expertise, and Online Features. Each issue offers Continuing Education (CE) articles in both print and online formats.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信