Validity assessment of oral health promotion activities targeting the older population for community care in South Korea: A Delphi study.

IF 2 3区 医学 Q2 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Gerodontology Pub Date : 2024-07-10 DOI:10.1111/ger.12768
Jin-Sun Choi, Soo-Myoung Bae, Bo-Mi Shin, Hyo-Jin Lee, Hye-Young Yoon, Sun-Jung Shin
{"title":"Validity assessment of oral health promotion activities targeting the older population for community care in South Korea: A Delphi study.","authors":"Jin-Sun Choi, Soo-Myoung Bae, Bo-Mi Shin, Hyo-Jin Lee, Hye-Young Yoon, Sun-Jung Shin","doi":"10.1111/ger.12768","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The purpose of this study was to establish an oral health activity assessment tool for older people and evaluate its validity.</p><p><strong>Background: </strong>To provide reasonable and efficient oral health promotion services with limited medical resources, a tool including categories and items of oral health promotion activities for older people should be prepared.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The tool initially consisted of 76 items on oral health promotion activities for older people classified into assessment-performance-evaluation stages. Topics for each stage included general and oral health, daily health, oral health status, behaviour, and awareness. In addition, two Delphi surveys were conducted on 10 experts who met the selection criteria, and the final items were derived based on the review opinions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>As a result of the first and second Delphi surveys, the content validity for all items was ≥0.60 and the content validity index was ≥0.80. In the first survey, the degree of convergence in some items was 0-0.88. After modifying the contents according to expert opinions, the degree of convergence was improved from 0 to 0.50 in the second survey. The degree of agreement ranged from 0.75 to 1.00, indicating that experts agreed. Finally, a total of 65 items were derived.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A 65-item tool was derived through two Delphi surveys for the assessment of oral health activities for older people. The use of the tool developed in this study would likely contribute to better prevention of oral diseases and the promotion of oral health among older people.</p>","PeriodicalId":12583,"journal":{"name":"Gerodontology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gerodontology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ger.12768","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The purpose of this study was to establish an oral health activity assessment tool for older people and evaluate its validity.

Background: To provide reasonable and efficient oral health promotion services with limited medical resources, a tool including categories and items of oral health promotion activities for older people should be prepared.

Materials and methods: The tool initially consisted of 76 items on oral health promotion activities for older people classified into assessment-performance-evaluation stages. Topics for each stage included general and oral health, daily health, oral health status, behaviour, and awareness. In addition, two Delphi surveys were conducted on 10 experts who met the selection criteria, and the final items were derived based on the review opinions.

Results: As a result of the first and second Delphi surveys, the content validity for all items was ≥0.60 and the content validity index was ≥0.80. In the first survey, the degree of convergence in some items was 0-0.88. After modifying the contents according to expert opinions, the degree of convergence was improved from 0 to 0.50 in the second survey. The degree of agreement ranged from 0.75 to 1.00, indicating that experts agreed. Finally, a total of 65 items were derived.

Conclusion: A 65-item tool was derived through two Delphi surveys for the assessment of oral health activities for older people. The use of the tool developed in this study would likely contribute to better prevention of oral diseases and the promotion of oral health among older people.

韩国针对老年人口腔健康促进活动的有效性评估:德尔菲研究。
研究目的本研究的目的是建立老年人口腔健康活动评估工具,并评估其有效性:背景:为了在有限的医疗资源下提供合理有效的口腔健康促进服务,应准备一个包括老年人口腔健康促进活动类别和项目的工具:该工具最初由 76 个老年人口腔健康促进活动项目组成,分为评估-表现-评价阶段。每个阶段的主题包括一般健康和口腔健康、日常健康、口腔健康状况、行为和意识。此外,还对符合选择标准的 10 位专家进行了两次德尔菲调查,并根据审查意见得出了最终项目:第一次和第二次德尔菲调查的结果显示,所有项目的内容效度均≥0.60,内容效度指数≥0.80。在第一次调查中,部分项目的趋同度为 0-0.88。根据专家意见修改内容后,第二次调查的趋同度从 0 提高到 0.50。吻合度在 0.75 至 1.00 之间,表明专家表示同意。最后,共得出 65 个项目:通过两次德尔菲调查,得出了 65 个项目的老年人口腔保健活动评估工具。使用本研究开发的工具可能有助于更好地预防口腔疾病和促进老年人口腔健康。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Gerodontology
Gerodontology 医学-老年医学
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
10.00%
发文量
50
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The ultimate aim of Gerodontology is to improve the quality of life and oral health of older people. The boundaries of most conventional dental specialties must be repeatedly crossed to provide optimal dental care for older people. In addition, management of other health problems impacts on dental care and clinicians need knowledge in these numerous overlapping areas. Bringing together these diverse topics within one journal serves clinicians who are seeking to read and to publish papers across a broad spectrum of specialties. This journal provides the juxtaposition of papers from traditional specialties but which share this patient-centred interest, providing a synergy that serves progress in the subject of gerodontology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信