Efficacy and safety of focal pulsed-field ablation for ventricular arrhythmias: two-centre experience.

IF 7.9 1区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Europace Pub Date : 2024-07-02 DOI:10.1093/europace/euae192
Petr Peichl, Alan Bulava, Dan Wichterle, Filip Schlosser, Predrag Stojadinović, Eva Borišincová, Peter Štiavnický, Jana Hašková, Josef Kautzner
{"title":"Efficacy and safety of focal pulsed-field ablation for ventricular arrhythmias: two-centre experience.","authors":"Petr Peichl, Alan Bulava, Dan Wichterle, Filip Schlosser, Predrag Stojadinović, Eva Borišincová, Peter Štiavnický, Jana Hašková, Josef Kautzner","doi":"10.1093/europace/euae192","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>A pulsed electric field (PF) energy source is a novel potential option for catheter ablation of ventricular arrhythmias (VAs) as it can create deeper lesions, particularly in scarred tissue. However, very limited data exist on its efficacy and safety. This prospective observational study reports the initial experience with VA ablation using focal PF.</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>The study population consisted of 44 patients (16 women, aged 61 ± 14years) with either frequent ventricular premature complexes (VPCs, 48%) or scar-related ventricular tachycardia (VT, 52%). Ablation was performed using an irrigated 4 mm tip catheter and a commercially available PF generator. On average, 16 ± 15 PF applications (25 A) were delivered per patient. Acute success was achieved in 84% of patients as assessed by elimination of VPC or reaching non-inducibility of VT. In three cases (7%), a transient conduction system block was observed during PF applications remotely from the septum. Root analysis revealed that this event was caused by current leakage from the proximal shaft electrodes in contact with the basal interventricular septum. Acute elimination of VPC was achieved in 81% patients and non-inducibility of VT in 83% patients. At the 3-month follow-up, persistent suppression of the VPC was confirmed on Holter monitoring in 81% patients. In the VT group, the mean follow-up was 116 ± 75 days and a total of 52% patients remained free of any VA.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Pulsed electric field catheter ablation of a broad spectrum of VA is feasible with acute high efficacy; however, the short-term follow-up is less satisfactory for patients with scar-related VT.</p>","PeriodicalId":11981,"journal":{"name":"Europace","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11264298/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Europace","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/europace/euae192","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims: A pulsed electric field (PF) energy source is a novel potential option for catheter ablation of ventricular arrhythmias (VAs) as it can create deeper lesions, particularly in scarred tissue. However, very limited data exist on its efficacy and safety. This prospective observational study reports the initial experience with VA ablation using focal PF.

Methods and results: The study population consisted of 44 patients (16 women, aged 61 ± 14years) with either frequent ventricular premature complexes (VPCs, 48%) or scar-related ventricular tachycardia (VT, 52%). Ablation was performed using an irrigated 4 mm tip catheter and a commercially available PF generator. On average, 16 ± 15 PF applications (25 A) were delivered per patient. Acute success was achieved in 84% of patients as assessed by elimination of VPC or reaching non-inducibility of VT. In three cases (7%), a transient conduction system block was observed during PF applications remotely from the septum. Root analysis revealed that this event was caused by current leakage from the proximal shaft electrodes in contact with the basal interventricular septum. Acute elimination of VPC was achieved in 81% patients and non-inducibility of VT in 83% patients. At the 3-month follow-up, persistent suppression of the VPC was confirmed on Holter monitoring in 81% patients. In the VT group, the mean follow-up was 116 ± 75 days and a total of 52% patients remained free of any VA.

Conclusion: Pulsed electric field catheter ablation of a broad spectrum of VA is feasible with acute high efficacy; however, the short-term follow-up is less satisfactory for patients with scar-related VT.

局灶脉冲场消融治疗室性心律失常的有效性和安全性:两个中心的经验。
背景和目的:脉冲电场(PF)能量源是导管消融室性心律失常(VA)的一种新的潜在选择,因为它可以产生更深的病灶,尤其是在瘢痕组织中。然而,有关其疗效和安全性的数据非常有限。这项前瞻性观察研究报告了使用病灶 PF 进行室性心律失常消融的初步经验:研究对象包括 44 名患者(16 名女性,年龄为 61±14 岁),他们都患有频发室性早搏(VPC)(48%)或瘢痕相关性室性心动过速(VT)(52%)。消融使用灌洗过的 4 毫米尖端导管和市售 PF 发生器:每位患者平均使用 16±15PF 应用程序(25A)。通过消除 VPC 或达到 VT 的非诱导性评估,84% 的患者取得了急性成功。在 3 例患者(7%)中,在远离室间隔的位置应用 PF 时观察到短暂的传导系统阻滞。根源分析表明,这一事件是由于与基底室间隔接触的近端轴电极漏电流造成的。81% 的患者在短期内消除了 VPC,83% 的患者不再诱发 VT。在三个月的随访中,81% 的患者通过 Holter 监测证实了 VPC 的持续抑制。在 VT 组中,平均随访时间为 116±75 天,52% 的患者仍未出现任何 VA:结论:PF 导管消融广泛的 VA 是可行的,且急性疗效高,但瘢痕相关 VT 患者的短期随访效果并不理想。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Europace
Europace 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
8.20%
发文量
851
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: EP - Europace - European Journal of Pacing, Arrhythmias and Cardiac Electrophysiology of the European Heart Rhythm Association of the European Society of Cardiology. The journal aims to provide an avenue of communication of top quality European and international original scientific work and reviews in the fields of Arrhythmias, Pacing and Cellular Electrophysiology. The Journal offers the reader a collection of contemporary original peer-reviewed papers, invited papers and editorial comments together with book reviews and correspondence.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信