Copeptin's role in traumatic brain injury: The promising quest for a new biomarker

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Alina Săcărescu , Iulia – Cătălina Pleşca , Mihaela-Dana Turliuc
{"title":"Copeptin's role in traumatic brain injury: The promising quest for a new biomarker","authors":"Alina Săcărescu ,&nbsp;Iulia – Cătălina Pleşca ,&nbsp;Mihaela-Dana Turliuc","doi":"10.1016/j.clineuro.2024.108432","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>Traumatic brain injury (TBI) necessitates reliable biomarkers to improve patient care. This study explored copeptin as a potential biomarker in TBI and its relation to vasopressin (ADH) in such patients.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A cross-sectional study was conducted on 50 TBI patients. Exclusion criteria included specific medical conditions and recent traumatic events. Copeptin and ADH testing were performed within 30 days post-trauma. Patient data, Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) scores, imaging results, and the need for surgical intervention were obtained from medical charts.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Copeptin levels negatively correlated with GCS scores (ρ = − 0.313, p = 0.027), indicating a potential association with trauma severity. Copeptin levels (mean: 3.22 pmol/L, median 2.027 pmol/L, SD = 3.15) tended to be lower than those found in the normal population, suggesting possible neuroendocrine dysfunction post-TBI. ADH levels (mean: 67.93 pmol/L, median 56.474 pmol/L SD = 47.67) were higher than the normal range and associated with the need for surgery (p = 0.048). Surprisingly, copeptin and ADH levels negatively correlated (r = − 0.491; p &lt; 0.001), potentially due to differences in degradation processes and physiological variations in TBI patients.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Copeptin shows potential as a predictive biomarker for assessing TBI severity and predicting patient outcome. However, its complex relationship with ADH in TBI requires further investigation. Careful interpretation is needed due to potential variations in excretion dynamics and metabolism. Larger studies on TBI patient cohorts are essential to validate copeptin as a reliable biomarker and improve patient care in TBI.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":10385,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0303846724003196","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) necessitates reliable biomarkers to improve patient care. This study explored copeptin as a potential biomarker in TBI and its relation to vasopressin (ADH) in such patients.

Methods

A cross-sectional study was conducted on 50 TBI patients. Exclusion criteria included specific medical conditions and recent traumatic events. Copeptin and ADH testing were performed within 30 days post-trauma. Patient data, Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) scores, imaging results, and the need for surgical intervention were obtained from medical charts.

Results

Copeptin levels negatively correlated with GCS scores (ρ = − 0.313, p = 0.027), indicating a potential association with trauma severity. Copeptin levels (mean: 3.22 pmol/L, median 2.027 pmol/L, SD = 3.15) tended to be lower than those found in the normal population, suggesting possible neuroendocrine dysfunction post-TBI. ADH levels (mean: 67.93 pmol/L, median 56.474 pmol/L SD = 47.67) were higher than the normal range and associated with the need for surgery (p = 0.048). Surprisingly, copeptin and ADH levels negatively correlated (r = − 0.491; p < 0.001), potentially due to differences in degradation processes and physiological variations in TBI patients.

Conclusion

Copeptin shows potential as a predictive biomarker for assessing TBI severity and predicting patient outcome. However, its complex relationship with ADH in TBI requires further investigation. Careful interpretation is needed due to potential variations in excretion dynamics and metabolism. Larger studies on TBI patient cohorts are essential to validate copeptin as a reliable biomarker and improve patient care in TBI.

Copeptin 在创伤性脑损伤中的作用:对新生物标志物的探索大有可为。
目的:创伤性脑损伤(TBI)需要可靠的生物标志物来改善患者护理。本研究探讨了作为创伤性脑损伤潜在生物标志物的 copeptin 及其与此类患者血管加压素(ADH)的关系:对 50 名创伤性脑损伤患者进行了横断面研究。排除标准包括特定疾病和近期创伤事件。创伤后 30 天内进行谷丙肽和 ADH 检测。从病历中获取了患者数据、格拉斯哥昏迷量表(GCS)评分、影像学检查结果以及手术干预需求:谷丙肽水平与 GCS 评分呈负相关(ρ = - 0.313,p = 0.027),这表明谷丙肽与创伤严重程度可能存在关联。谷肽水平(平均值:3.22 pmol/L,中位值:2.027 pmol/L,SD = 3.15)往往低于正常人群,这表明创伤后可能存在神经内分泌功能障碍。ADH水平(平均值:67.93 pmol/L,中位值:56.474 pmol/L SD = 47.67)高于正常范围,并与手术需求相关(p = 0.048)。令人惊讶的是,谷丙肽和ADH水平呈负相关(r = - 0.491; p < 0.001),这可能是由于创伤性脑损伤患者的降解过程和生理变化存在差异:结论:谷丙转氨酶有望成为评估创伤性脑损伤严重程度和预测患者预后的预测性生物标志物。然而,它与 TBI 中 ADH 的复杂关系还需要进一步研究。由于排泄动态和新陈代谢可能存在差异,因此需要谨慎解释。对创伤性脑损伤患者群体进行更大规模的研究对于验证 copeptin 作为一种可靠的生物标记物和改善创伤性脑损伤患者的护理至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery
Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
5.30%
发文量
358
审稿时长
46 days
期刊介绍: Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery is devoted to publishing papers and reports on the clinical aspects of neurology and neurosurgery. It is an international forum for papers of high scientific standard that are of interest to Neurologists and Neurosurgeons world-wide.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信