Comparison of the perception of palliative care by healthcare professionals in some countries around the world: a systematic review.

4区 医学 Q2 Nursing
Annals of palliative medicine Pub Date : 2024-07-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-25 DOI:10.21037/apm-24-39
Jane Christine Rodrigues Magalhães, Augusto Etchegaray, Gisele Mara Silva Gonçalves
{"title":"Comparison of the perception of palliative care by healthcare professionals in some countries around the world: a systematic review.","authors":"Jane Christine Rodrigues Magalhães, Augusto Etchegaray, Gisele Mara Silva Gonçalves","doi":"10.21037/apm-24-39","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The global need for palliative care (PC) is increasing, especially as the population ages. The diagnosis of a life-threatening illness triggers numerous decisions by healthcare professionals (HCPs). How these professionals understand and deal with PC influences the quantity and quality of care provided to patients. This systematic review aimed to compare perceptions of PC among HCPs around the world.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The databases (MEDLINE/PubMed, Embase, LILACS, and EBSCO) were searched systematically. Articles reporting on the perception of HCPs, published between January 2012 and December 2022, were included. Texts that reported the perceptions of family members and patients were excluded to avoid the risk of bias. Those included were organized by country/region and continent for later analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 2,063 articles initially retrieved 32 were included and provided relevant information from four continents (America, Asia, Europe, and Oceania). Most of this was done through interviews and questionnaires. All HCPs consulted in the studies recognized the importance of PC. The perception of these professionals was influenced by cultural factors (such as religion), difficulties perceived in each country/region (such as inadequate knowledge, conceptual confusion, etc.), diseases, and the age range of patients served. The acceptance and preparation of professionals to deal with this topic in their routine also influenced their perceptions of HCPs. The limitation of this research is the lack of eligible studies from Africa and the small number of participants in some studies.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>It can be concluded that HCPs' perceptions of PC are similar, regardless of their country of origin.</p>","PeriodicalId":7956,"journal":{"name":"Annals of palliative medicine","volume":" ","pages":"1090-1100"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of palliative medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21037/apm-24-39","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Nursing","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The global need for palliative care (PC) is increasing, especially as the population ages. The diagnosis of a life-threatening illness triggers numerous decisions by healthcare professionals (HCPs). How these professionals understand and deal with PC influences the quantity and quality of care provided to patients. This systematic review aimed to compare perceptions of PC among HCPs around the world.

Methods: The databases (MEDLINE/PubMed, Embase, LILACS, and EBSCO) were searched systematically. Articles reporting on the perception of HCPs, published between January 2012 and December 2022, were included. Texts that reported the perceptions of family members and patients were excluded to avoid the risk of bias. Those included were organized by country/region and continent for later analysis.

Results: Of the 2,063 articles initially retrieved 32 were included and provided relevant information from four continents (America, Asia, Europe, and Oceania). Most of this was done through interviews and questionnaires. All HCPs consulted in the studies recognized the importance of PC. The perception of these professionals was influenced by cultural factors (such as religion), difficulties perceived in each country/region (such as inadequate knowledge, conceptual confusion, etc.), diseases, and the age range of patients served. The acceptance and preparation of professionals to deal with this topic in their routine also influenced their perceptions of HCPs. The limitation of this research is the lack of eligible studies from Africa and the small number of participants in some studies.

Conclusions: It can be concluded that HCPs' perceptions of PC are similar, regardless of their country of origin.

全球部分国家医护人员对姑息关怀认知的比较:系统性综述。
背景:全球对姑息关怀(PC)的需求与日俱增,尤其是随着人口老龄化的加剧。诊断出危及生命的疾病后,医疗保健专业人员(HCPs)会做出许多决定。这些专业人员对姑息关怀的理解和处理方式影响着为患者提供的关怀服务的数量和质量。本系统综述旨在比较世界各地医护人员对 PC 的看法:对数据库(MEDLINE/PubMed、Embase、LILACS 和 EBSCO)进行了系统检索。收录了 2012 年 1 月至 2022 年 12 月间发表的有关 HCP 感知的文章。为避免偏倚风险,排除了报告家庭成员和患者看法的文章。纳入的文章按国家/地区和大洲进行分类,以便日后分析:在最初检索到的 2063 篇文章中,有 32 篇被收录,并提供了来自四大洲(美洲、亚洲、欧洲和大洋洲)的相关信息。大部分信息是通过访谈和问卷调查获得的。研究中咨询的所有保健专业人员都认识到 PC 的重要性。这些专业人员的看法受到文化因素(如宗教)、每个国家/地区所面临的困难(如知识不足、概念混淆等)、疾病和所服务患者的年龄范围的影响。专业人员在日常工作中对这一主题的接受程度和准备情况也影响了他们对 HCP 的看法。这项研究的局限性在于缺乏来自非洲的符合条件的研究,以及一些研究的参与者人数较少:结论:可以得出结论,无论来自哪个国家,保健专业人员对 PC 的看法都是相似的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Annals of palliative medicine
Annals of palliative medicine Medicine-Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine
自引率
0.00%
发文量
231
期刊介绍: Annals of Palliative Medicine (Ann Palliat Med; Print ISSN 2224-5820; Online ISSN 2224-5839) is an open access, international, peer-reviewed journal published quarterly with both online and printed copies since 2012. The aim of the journal is to provide up-to-date and cutting-edge information and professional support for health care providers in palliative medicine disciplines to improve the quality of life for patients and their families and caregivers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信