Programme science methodologies and practices that address “FURRIE” challenges: examples from the field

IF 4.6 1区 医学 Q2 IMMUNOLOGY
James R Hargreaves, Solange Baptiste, Parinita Bhattacharjee, Frances M Cowan, Michael E Herce, Krista Lauer, Izukanji Sikazwe, Elvin Geng
{"title":"Programme science methodologies and practices that address “FURRIE” challenges: examples from the field","authors":"James R Hargreaves,&nbsp;Solange Baptiste,&nbsp;Parinita Bhattacharjee,&nbsp;Frances M Cowan,&nbsp;Michael E Herce,&nbsp;Krista Lauer,&nbsp;Izukanji Sikazwe,&nbsp;Elvin Geng","doi":"10.1002/jia2.26283","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>“Programme science” deploys scientific methods to address questions that are a priority to support the impact of public health programmes. As such, programme science responds to the challenges of making such studies: (1) feasible to undertake, (2) useful, (3) rigorous, (4) real-world-relevant, (5) informative, and undertaken by (6) equitable partnerships. The acronym “FURRIE” is proposed to describe this set of six challenges. This paper discusses selected HIV/STI (sexually transmitted infection) programme science case studies to illustrate how programme science rises to the FURRIE challenges.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Discussion</h3>\n \n <p>One way in which programme science is made more feasible is through the analysis and interpretation of data collected through service delivery. For some questions, these data can be augmented through methods that reach potential clients of services who have not accessed services or been lost to follow-up. Process evaluation can enhance the usefulness of programme science by studying implementation processes, programme−client interactions and contextual factors. Ensuring rigour by limiting bias and confounding in the real-world context of programme science studies requires methodological innovation. Striving for scientific rigour can also have the unintended consequence of creating a gap between what happens in a study, and what happens in the “real-world.” Community-led monitoring is one approach to grounding data collection in the real-world experience of clients. Evaluating complex, context-specific strategies to strengthen health outcomes in a way that is informative for other settings requires clear specification of the intervention packages that are planned and delivered in practice. Programme science provides a model for equitable partnership through co-leadership between programmes, researchers and the communities they serve.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Programme science addresses the FURRIE challenges, thereby improving programme impact and ultimately health outcomes and health equity. The adoption and adaptation of the types of novel programme science approaches showcased here should be promoted within and beyond the HIV/STI field.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":201,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the International AIDS Society","volume":"27 S2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jia2.26283","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the International AIDS Society","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jia2.26283","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

“Programme science” deploys scientific methods to address questions that are a priority to support the impact of public health programmes. As such, programme science responds to the challenges of making such studies: (1) feasible to undertake, (2) useful, (3) rigorous, (4) real-world-relevant, (5) informative, and undertaken by (6) equitable partnerships. The acronym “FURRIE” is proposed to describe this set of six challenges. This paper discusses selected HIV/STI (sexually transmitted infection) programme science case studies to illustrate how programme science rises to the FURRIE challenges.

Discussion

One way in which programme science is made more feasible is through the analysis and interpretation of data collected through service delivery. For some questions, these data can be augmented through methods that reach potential clients of services who have not accessed services or been lost to follow-up. Process evaluation can enhance the usefulness of programme science by studying implementation processes, programme−client interactions and contextual factors. Ensuring rigour by limiting bias and confounding in the real-world context of programme science studies requires methodological innovation. Striving for scientific rigour can also have the unintended consequence of creating a gap between what happens in a study, and what happens in the “real-world.” Community-led monitoring is one approach to grounding data collection in the real-world experience of clients. Evaluating complex, context-specific strategies to strengthen health outcomes in a way that is informative for other settings requires clear specification of the intervention packages that are planned and delivered in practice. Programme science provides a model for equitable partnership through co-leadership between programmes, researchers and the communities they serve.

Conclusions

Programme science addresses the FURRIE challenges, thereby improving programme impact and ultimately health outcomes and health equity. The adoption and adaptation of the types of novel programme science approaches showcased here should be promoted within and beyond the HIV/STI field.

应对 "FURRIE "挑战的计划科学方法和实践:来自实地的实例。
导言:"计划科学 "运用科学方法来解决优先支持公共卫生计划影响的问题。因此,"计划科学 "要应对以下挑战:(1) 开展此类研究的可行性;(2) 实用性;(3) 严谨性;(4) 与现实世界相关性;(5) 信息性;(6) 公平的伙伴关系。本文提出了首字母缩写词 "FURRIE "来描述这六大挑战。本文讨论了部分 HIV/STI(性传播感染)计划科学案例研究,以说明计划科学如何应对 FURRIE 挑战:使计划科学更加可行的方法之一是分析和解释通过提供服务收集到的数据。对于某些问题,可以通过接触尚未获得服务或失去后续服务的潜在服务对象的方法来扩充这些数据。过程评估可以通过研究实施过程、计划与客户之间的互动以及背景因素来提高计划 科学的实用性。在计划科学研究的真实世界背景下,要通过限制偏差和混杂因素来确保严谨性,就需要在方法上进行创新。力求科学严谨也可能产生意想不到的后果,即在研究中发生的事情与 "现实世界 "中发生的事情之间产生差距。以社区为主导的监测是将数据收集工作建立在客户实际经验基础上的一种方法。要评估复杂的、针对具体情况的战略,以加强健康成果,并为其他环境提供信息,就需要明确说明在实践中计划和实施的一揽子干预措施。计划科学通过计划、研究人员和他们所服务的社区之间的共同领导,为公平的伙伴关系提供了一种模式:结论:计划科学解决了 FURRIE 面临的挑战,从而提高了计划的影响力,并最终改善了卫生成果和卫生公平性。应在艾滋病毒/性传播感染领域内外推广采用和调整此处展示的新型计划科学方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of the International AIDS Society
Journal of the International AIDS Society IMMUNOLOGY-INFECTIOUS DISEASES
CiteScore
8.60
自引率
10.00%
发文量
186
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of the International AIDS Society (JIAS) is a peer-reviewed and Open Access journal for the generation and dissemination of evidence from a wide range of disciplines: basic and biomedical sciences; behavioural sciences; epidemiology; clinical sciences; health economics and health policy; operations research and implementation sciences; and social sciences and humanities. Submission of HIV research carried out in low- and middle-income countries is strongly encouraged.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信