The Impact of a Primary Aldosteronism Predictive Model in Secondary Hypertension Decision Support

Peter Bowman Mack, Casey Cole, Mintaek Lee, Lisa Peterson, Matthew Lundy, Karen Elizabeth Hegarty, William Espinoza
{"title":"The Impact of a Primary Aldosteronism Predictive Model in Secondary Hypertension Decision Support","authors":"Peter Bowman Mack, Casey Cole, Mintaek Lee, Lisa Peterson, Matthew Lundy, Karen Elizabeth Hegarty, William Espinoza","doi":"10.1101/2024.07.09.24310088","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: To determine whether the addition of a primary aldosteronism (PA) predictive model to a secondary hypertension decision support\ntool increases screening for PA in a primary care setting.\nMaterials and Methods: 153 primary care clinics were randomized to receive a secondary hypertension decision support tool with or without\nan integrated predictive model between August 2023 and April 2024.\nResults: For patients with risk scores in the top 1 percentile, 63/2,896 (2.2%) patients where the alert was displayed in model clinics had the\norder set launched while 12/1,210 (1.0%) in no model clinics had the order set launched (P = 0.014). 19/2,896 (0.66%) of these highest risk\npatients in model clinics had an ARR ordered compared to 0/1,210 (0.0%) patients in no model clinics (P = 0.010). For patients with scores\nnot in the top 1 percentile, 438/20,493 (2.1%) patients in model clinics had the order set launched compared to 273/17,820 (1.5%) in no model\nclinics (P < 0.001). 124/20,493 (0.61%) in model clinics had an ARR ordered compared to 34/17,820 (0.19%) in the no model clinics (P <\n0.001).\nDiscussion: The addition of a PA predictive model to secondary hypertension alert displays and triggering criteria along with order set displays\nand order preselection criteria results in a statistically and clinically significant increase in screening for PA, a condition that clinicians\ninsufficiently screen for currently.\nConclusion: Addition of a predictive model for an under-screened condition to traditional clinical decision support may increase screening for\nthese conditions.","PeriodicalId":501454,"journal":{"name":"medRxiv - Health Informatics","volume":"15 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"medRxiv - Health Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.07.09.24310088","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To determine whether the addition of a primary aldosteronism (PA) predictive model to a secondary hypertension decision support tool increases screening for PA in a primary care setting. Materials and Methods: 153 primary care clinics were randomized to receive a secondary hypertension decision support tool with or without an integrated predictive model between August 2023 and April 2024. Results: For patients with risk scores in the top 1 percentile, 63/2,896 (2.2%) patients where the alert was displayed in model clinics had the order set launched while 12/1,210 (1.0%) in no model clinics had the order set launched (P = 0.014). 19/2,896 (0.66%) of these highest risk patients in model clinics had an ARR ordered compared to 0/1,210 (0.0%) patients in no model clinics (P = 0.010). For patients with scores not in the top 1 percentile, 438/20,493 (2.1%) patients in model clinics had the order set launched compared to 273/17,820 (1.5%) in no model clinics (P < 0.001). 124/20,493 (0.61%) in model clinics had an ARR ordered compared to 34/17,820 (0.19%) in the no model clinics (P < 0.001). Discussion: The addition of a PA predictive model to secondary hypertension alert displays and triggering criteria along with order set displays and order preselection criteria results in a statistically and clinically significant increase in screening for PA, a condition that clinicians insufficiently screen for currently. Conclusion: Addition of a predictive model for an under-screened condition to traditional clinical decision support may increase screening for these conditions.
原发性醛固酮增多症预测模型对继发性高血压决策支持的影响
目的:确定在二级高血压决策支持工具中添加原发性醛固酮增多症(PA)预测模型是否能提高初级医疗机构的 PA 筛查率:材料与方法:在 2023 年 8 月至 2024 年 4 月期间,对 153 家初级保健诊所进行了随机分组,以接受带或不带集成预测模型的二级高血压决策支持工具:对于风险评分在前1个百分位数的患者,有63/2896(2.2%)名患者在模型诊所显示了警报,并启动了订单集,而12/1210(1.0%)名患者在无模型诊所启动了订单集(P=0.014)。在这些高风险患者中,有 19/2,896 人(0.66%)在模式诊所中下达了 ARR,而在无模式诊所中,只有 0/1,210 人(0.0%)下达了 ARR(P = 0.010)。对于得分不在前 1 个百分位数的患者,有 438/20,493 名(2.1%)示范诊所的患者下达了订单,而无示范诊所的患者为 273/17,820 名(1.5%)(P <0.001)。124/20,493(0.61%)名模型诊所的患者下达了 ARR 订单,而无模型诊所的患者为 34/17,820(0.19%)(P <0.001):讨论:将 PA 预测模型添加到继发性高血压警报显示和触发标准以及医嘱集显示和医嘱预选标准中,可在统计学和临床上显著提高 PA 筛查率,而目前临床医生对 PA 的筛查并不充分:结论:在传统的临床决策支持中加入筛查不足病症的预测模型,可提高对这些病症的筛查率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信