Comparison of coastal wetland inventories for representative sites in the United States and implications for change detection

Abstract

This study aims to help coastal wetland managers understand the differences and trade-offs associated with alternative inventories in the United States (US) through a quantitative comparison of wetland land use land cover (LULC) maps available from the National Wetlands Inventory (NWI), Coastal Change Analysis Program (C-CAP), and Detection and Characterization of Coastal Tidal Wetland (DECODE). NWI and C-CAP were compared in five study sites spread across the Atlantic and Gulf coasts and align well under a four-class system, but discrepancies arise under a nine-class system, with C-CAP generally estimating smaller net wetland areas, larger emergent vegetation areas, and smaller scrub vegetation areas. The average overall accuracy for the C-CAP and NWI comparison is 89.4% and 82.4% for the coarser and finer scale classification systems, respectively. DECODE is available for two of the representative sites and uses a three-class system that differs from that of C-CAP and NWI, causing significant errors and an average overall accuracy of 59.5%. LULC change was quantified during the 1996 to 2016 period using the multi-temporal C-CAP and DECODE maps, showing that DECODE estimates significantly more change, by a factor of fifteen at one study site.. A spatial analysis of the classification differences shows that they often occur near the boundary of two wetland classes and within agricultural and built-up areas. The discrepancies in class definitions, net areas, and change estimates reported in this study should be referenced by managers who are developing wetland policies or management activities, such as carbon flux assessments and resilience plans.