In-situ measurement via the flow-through method and numerical simulations for radon exhalation during measurements of the radon exhalation rate

IF 3.6 1区 物理与天体物理 Q1 NUCLEAR SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Ming Xia, Yong-Jun Ye, Shan-Wei Shang, Ting Yu, Dai-Jia Chen
{"title":"In-situ measurement via the flow-through method and numerical simulations for radon exhalation during measurements of the radon exhalation rate","authors":"Ming Xia, Yong-Jun Ye, Shan-Wei Shang, Ting Yu, Dai-Jia Chen","doi":"10.1007/s41365-024-01491-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Small-scale measurements of the radon exhalation rate using the flow-through and closed-loop methods were conducted on the surface of a uranium tailing pond to better understand the differences between the two methods. An abnormal radon exhalation behavior was observed, leading to computational fluid dynamics (CFD)-based simulations in which dynamic radon migration in a porous medium and accumulation chamber was considered. Based on the in-situ experimental and numerical simulation results, variations in the radon exhalation rate subject to permeability, flow rate, and insertion depth were quantified and analyzed. The in-situ radon exhalation rates measured using the flow-through method were higher than those measured using the closed-loop method, which could be explained by the negative pressure difference between the inside and outside of the chamber during the measurements. The consistency of the variations in the radon exhalation rate between the experiments and simulations suggests the reliability of CFD-based techniques in obtaining the dynamic evolution of transient radon exhalation rates for diffusion and convection at the porous medium-air interface. The synergistic effects of the three factors (insertion depth, flow rate, and permeability) on the negative pressure difference and measured exhalation rate were quantified, and multivariate regression models were established, with positive correlations in most cases; the exhalation rate decreased with increasing insertion depth at a permeability of 1 × 10<sup>−11</sup> m<sup>2</sup>. CFD-based simulations can provide theoretical guidance for improving the flow-through method and thus achieve accurate measurements.</p>","PeriodicalId":19177,"journal":{"name":"Nuclear Science and Techniques","volume":"16 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nuclear Science and Techniques","FirstCategoryId":"101","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s41365-024-01491-5","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"物理与天体物理","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NUCLEAR SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Small-scale measurements of the radon exhalation rate using the flow-through and closed-loop methods were conducted on the surface of a uranium tailing pond to better understand the differences between the two methods. An abnormal radon exhalation behavior was observed, leading to computational fluid dynamics (CFD)-based simulations in which dynamic radon migration in a porous medium and accumulation chamber was considered. Based on the in-situ experimental and numerical simulation results, variations in the radon exhalation rate subject to permeability, flow rate, and insertion depth were quantified and analyzed. The in-situ radon exhalation rates measured using the flow-through method were higher than those measured using the closed-loop method, which could be explained by the negative pressure difference between the inside and outside of the chamber during the measurements. The consistency of the variations in the radon exhalation rate between the experiments and simulations suggests the reliability of CFD-based techniques in obtaining the dynamic evolution of transient radon exhalation rates for diffusion and convection at the porous medium-air interface. The synergistic effects of the three factors (insertion depth, flow rate, and permeability) on the negative pressure difference and measured exhalation rate were quantified, and multivariate regression models were established, with positive correlations in most cases; the exhalation rate decreased with increasing insertion depth at a permeability of 1 × 10−11 m2. CFD-based simulations can provide theoretical guidance for improving the flow-through method and thus achieve accurate measurements.

Abstract Image

在测量氡呼出率时,通过流经法和数值模拟对氡呼出进行现场测量
为了更好地了解两种方法之间的差异,我们在铀尾矿池的表面采用流经法和闭环法对氡的呼出率进行了小规模测量。在观察到异常的氡呼出行为后,进行了基于计算流体动力学(CFD)的模拟,其中考虑了多孔介质和积聚室中氡的动态迁移。根据现场实验和数值模拟结果,量化并分析了氡呼出率随渗透率、流速和插入深度的变化。采用贯流法测量的原位氡呼出率高于采用闭环法测量的氡呼出率,其原因可能是测量时腔室内外存在负压差。实验与模拟之间氡呼出率变化的一致性表明,基于 CFD 的技术可以可靠地获得多孔介质-空气界面扩散和对流的瞬态氡呼出率的动态演变。量化了三个因素(插入深度、流速和渗透率)对负压差和实测呼出率的协同效应,并建立了多元回归模型,在大多数情况下呈正相关;在渗透率为 1 × 10-11 m2 时,呼出率随插入深度的增加而降低。基于 CFD 的模拟可为改进穿流方法提供理论指导,从而实现精确测量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Nuclear Science and Techniques
Nuclear Science and Techniques 物理-核科学技术
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
39.30%
发文量
141
审稿时长
5 months
期刊介绍: Nuclear Science and Techniques (NST) reports scientific findings, technical advances and important results in the fields of nuclear science and techniques. The aim of this periodical is to stimulate cross-fertilization of knowledge among scientists and engineers working in the fields of nuclear research. Scope covers the following subjects: • Synchrotron radiation applications, beamline technology; • Accelerator, ray technology and applications; • Nuclear chemistry, radiochemistry, radiopharmaceuticals, nuclear medicine; • Nuclear electronics and instrumentation; • Nuclear physics and interdisciplinary research; • Nuclear energy science and engineering.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信