A Second Violation of the Sharia Provision: Egypt’s SCC’s Ruling of 12 May 2013, in the Case No. 37/xxxiii (Annotated and Translated)

IF 0.5 Q3 LAW
Gianluca Parolin
{"title":"A Second Violation of the Sharia Provision: Egypt’s SCC’s Ruling of 12 May 2013, in the Case No. 37/xxxiii (Annotated and Translated)","authors":"Gianluca Parolin","doi":"10.1163/15730255-bja10166","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>In mid-2013, Egypt’s Supreme Constitutional Court found a statutory provision in force at the time of the decision to be in violation of the constitutional provision declaring the principles of Islamic sharia the chief source of legislation (Article 2). It was the second time since the provision was originally introduced in the Constitution in 1971 and later amended in 1980. It had only happened once before, in 2006. In the ruling considered here, the Court confirmed its conventional construction of Article 2, and declared that in the case at hand the legislator had simply overstepped its boundaries by restricting the exercise of the grandparents’ visitation rights to the case of the absence of parents. In the eyes of the Court, the legislator was entitled to regulate grandparents’ visitation rights, but in doing so it did not properly align its intervention with the overall objectives of sharia (<em>maqāṣid</em>). The ruling was issued in a relatively peaceful phase that followed a fierce and prolonged confrontation between the Court and Islamists the previous year.</p>","PeriodicalId":43925,"journal":{"name":"Arab Law Quarterly","volume":"17 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Arab Law Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/15730255-bja10166","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In mid-2013, Egypt’s Supreme Constitutional Court found a statutory provision in force at the time of the decision to be in violation of the constitutional provision declaring the principles of Islamic sharia the chief source of legislation (Article 2). It was the second time since the provision was originally introduced in the Constitution in 1971 and later amended in 1980. It had only happened once before, in 2006. In the ruling considered here, the Court confirmed its conventional construction of Article 2, and declared that in the case at hand the legislator had simply overstepped its boundaries by restricting the exercise of the grandparents’ visitation rights to the case of the absence of parents. In the eyes of the Court, the legislator was entitled to regulate grandparents’ visitation rights, but in doing so it did not properly align its intervention with the overall objectives of sharia (maqāṣid). The ruling was issued in a relatively peaceful phase that followed a fierce and prolonged confrontation between the Court and Islamists the previous year.

第二次违反伊斯兰教法条款:埃及最高上诉法院 2013 年 5 月 12 日对第 37/xxxiii 号案件的裁决(注释和翻译版)
2013 年年中,埃及最高宪法法院认定当时有效的一项法律规定违反了宣布伊斯兰教法原则为立法主要来源的宪法条款(第 2 条)。这是自 1971 年《宪法》最初引入该条款并在 1980 年进行修订以来第二次出现这种情况。此前只在 2006 年发生过一次。在本案的裁决中,法院确认了其对第 2 条的传统解释,并宣布在本案中,立法者将祖父母探视权的行使限制在父母不在身边的情况下,这完全是超越了其界限。在法院看来,立法者有权对祖父母的探视权做出规定,但这样做并没有使其干预行为与伊斯兰教法(maqāṣid)的总体目标保持一致。该裁决是在相对和平的阶段做出的,在此之前的一年,法院与伊斯兰教徒之间发生了激烈而持久的对抗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
33.30%
发文量
23
期刊介绍: The leading English-language legal publication in its field, Arab Law Quarterly covers all aspects of Arab laws, both Shari"a and secular. Now in its third decade, it provides an important forum of authoritative articles on the laws and legal developments throughout the twenty countries of the Arab world, notes on recent legislation and case law, guidelines on future changes, and reviews of the latest literature in the field. Particular subject areas covered are Arab laws in trans-national affairs, commercial law, Islamic law (the Shari´a), and international comparative law.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信