Machine-Learning based Prediction Models for Healthcare Outcomes in Patients Participating in Cardiac Rehabilitation: A Systematic Review

Xiarepati Tieliwaerdi, Kathryn Manalo, Sana Khan, Edmund Appiahkubi, Andrew Oehler
{"title":"Machine-Learning based Prediction Models for Healthcare Outcomes in Patients Participating in Cardiac Rehabilitation: A Systematic Review","authors":"Xiarepati Tieliwaerdi, Kathryn Manalo, Sana Khan, Edmund Appiahkubi, Andrew Oehler","doi":"10.1101/2024.07.09.24310007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: CR has been proven to reduce mortality and morbidity in patients with CVD. ML techniques are increasingly used to predict healthcare outcomes in various fields of medicine including CR. This systemic review aims to perform critical appraisal of existing ML based prognosis predictive model within CR and identify key research gaps in this area. Review methods: A systematic literature search was conducted in Scopus, PubMed, Web of Science and Google Scholar from the inception of each database to 28th January 2024. The data extracted included clinical features, predicted outcomes, model development and validation as well as model performance metrics. Included studies underwent quality assessments using the IJMEDI.\nSummary: 22 ML-based clinical models from 7 studies across multiple phases of CR were included. Most models were developed using smaller patient cohorts from 41 to 227, with one exception involving 2280 patients. The prediction objectives ranged from patient intention to initiate CR to graduate from outpatient CR along with interval physiological and psychological response to CR. The best-performing ML models reported AUC between 0.82 and 0.91, sensitivity from 0.77 to 0.95, indicating good prediction capabilities. However, none of them underwent calibration or external validation. Most studies raised concerns for bias. Readiness of these models for implement into practice is questionable. External validation of existing models and development of new models with robust methodology based on larger populations and targeting diverse clinical overcomes in CR are needed.","PeriodicalId":501297,"journal":{"name":"medRxiv - Cardiovascular Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"medRxiv - Cardiovascular Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.07.09.24310007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: CR has been proven to reduce mortality and morbidity in patients with CVD. ML techniques are increasingly used to predict healthcare outcomes in various fields of medicine including CR. This systemic review aims to perform critical appraisal of existing ML based prognosis predictive model within CR and identify key research gaps in this area. Review methods: A systematic literature search was conducted in Scopus, PubMed, Web of Science and Google Scholar from the inception of each database to 28th January 2024. The data extracted included clinical features, predicted outcomes, model development and validation as well as model performance metrics. Included studies underwent quality assessments using the IJMEDI. Summary: 22 ML-based clinical models from 7 studies across multiple phases of CR were included. Most models were developed using smaller patient cohorts from 41 to 227, with one exception involving 2280 patients. The prediction objectives ranged from patient intention to initiate CR to graduate from outpatient CR along with interval physiological and psychological response to CR. The best-performing ML models reported AUC between 0.82 and 0.91, sensitivity from 0.77 to 0.95, indicating good prediction capabilities. However, none of them underwent calibration or external validation. Most studies raised concerns for bias. Readiness of these models for implement into practice is questionable. External validation of existing models and development of new models with robust methodology based on larger populations and targeting diverse clinical overcomes in CR are needed.
基于机器学习的心脏康复患者疗效预测模型:系统性综述
目的:事实证明,CR 可以降低心血管疾病患者的死亡率和发病率。包括 CR 在内的各个医学领域越来越多地使用 ML 技术来预测医疗结果。本系统综述旨在对 CR 中现有的基于 ML 的预后预测模型进行批判性评估,并找出该领域的主要研究空白。综述方法:在 Scopus、PubMed、Web of Science 和 Google Scholar 上进行了系统的文献检索,检索时间从各数据库建立之初至 2024 年 1 月 28 日。提取的数据包括临床特征、预测结果、模型开发和验证以及模型性能指标。摘要:共纳入了 7 项研究中的 22 个基于 ML 的临床模型,涉及 CR 的多个阶段。大多数模型都是使用较小的患者群(41 到 227 人)开发的,只有一个例外涉及 2280 名患者。预测目标从患者启动 CR 的意向到从门诊 CR 毕业,以及对 CR 的间歇性生理和心理反应不等。表现最好的 ML 模型的 AUC 在 0.82 到 0.91 之间,灵敏度在 0.77 到 0.95 之间,显示了良好的预测能力。但是,这些模型都没有经过校准或外部验证。大多数研究都提出了偏差问题。这些模型是否可用于实践值得怀疑。有必要对现有模型进行外部验证,并针对 CR 的不同临床结果,以更大的人群为基础,用可靠的方法开发新的模型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信