Estimation of groundwater flux with active distributed temperature sensing and the finite volume point dilution method: a field comparison

IF 2.4 3区 地球科学 Q2 GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Nataline Simon, Laura Balzani, Pierre Jamin, Serge Brouyère
{"title":"Estimation of groundwater flux with active distributed temperature sensing and the finite volume point dilution method: a field comparison","authors":"Nataline Simon, Laura Balzani, Pierre Jamin, Serge Brouyère","doi":"10.1007/s10040-024-02805-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Considering the importance of characterizing groundwater flow for assessing recharge and contaminant transport, this study investigates the potential of two field methods to estimate groundwater fluxes in consolidated aquifers. To accomplish this, both the finite volume point dilution method (FVPDM) test and active distributed temperature sensing (Active-DTS) measurements were conducted in a single piezometer in a chalk aquifer. The FVPDM is a single-well tracer experiment, that provides a measurement of the groundwater flow rate across the tested piezometer. Whereas the Active-DTS method was performed by deploying a fiber-optic (FO) cable outside the piezometer within the gravel filter. The Active-DTS method provided high spatial resolution and local groundwater flux estimates along the heated section. Numerical simulations were used to assess the distortion of the groundwater flow field induced by the presence of the well, demonstrating that the groundwater flux is maximum within the well screen, where the FVPDM test was conducted. In the immediate vicinity of the well, where the heated FO cable was installed, the groundwater flux is lower, and the flow pattern consisted of converging and diverging flow lines. Therefore, the position of the heated FO cable relative to the flow direction is critical and can have a significant impact on the estimation of the groundwater flux. Thus, even if the deployment of the FO cable within the gravel pack minimizes convective effects and opens up interesting perspectives to estimate vertical heterogeneities, this approach may be limited if the position of the FO cable relative to the flow direction is not well known.</p>","PeriodicalId":13013,"journal":{"name":"Hydrogeology Journal","volume":"10 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hydrogeology Journal","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10040-024-02805-y","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Considering the importance of characterizing groundwater flow for assessing recharge and contaminant transport, this study investigates the potential of two field methods to estimate groundwater fluxes in consolidated aquifers. To accomplish this, both the finite volume point dilution method (FVPDM) test and active distributed temperature sensing (Active-DTS) measurements were conducted in a single piezometer in a chalk aquifer. The FVPDM is a single-well tracer experiment, that provides a measurement of the groundwater flow rate across the tested piezometer. Whereas the Active-DTS method was performed by deploying a fiber-optic (FO) cable outside the piezometer within the gravel filter. The Active-DTS method provided high spatial resolution and local groundwater flux estimates along the heated section. Numerical simulations were used to assess the distortion of the groundwater flow field induced by the presence of the well, demonstrating that the groundwater flux is maximum within the well screen, where the FVPDM test was conducted. In the immediate vicinity of the well, where the heated FO cable was installed, the groundwater flux is lower, and the flow pattern consisted of converging and diverging flow lines. Therefore, the position of the heated FO cable relative to the flow direction is critical and can have a significant impact on the estimation of the groundwater flux. Thus, even if the deployment of the FO cable within the gravel pack minimizes convective effects and opens up interesting perspectives to estimate vertical heterogeneities, this approach may be limited if the position of the FO cable relative to the flow direction is not well known.

Abstract Image

利用主动分布式温度传感器和有限体积点稀释法估算地下水流量:实地比较
考虑到确定地下水流特征对于评估补给和污染物迁移的重要性,本研究调查了两种实地方法在估算固结含水层中地下水通量方面的潜力。为此,在白垩系含水层的单个压强计中进行了有限体积点稀释法(FVPDM)试验和主动分布式温度传感(Active-DTS)测量。有限体积点稀释法是一种单井示踪实验,可测量穿过测试压水计的地下水流速。而 Active-DTS 方法是通过在砾石过滤器内的压强计外部署光纤(FO)电缆来实现的。Active-DTS 方法提供了高空间分辨率和沿加热断面的局部地下水流量估算。数值模拟用于评估水井的存在对地下水流场造成的扭曲,结果表明,在进行 FVPDM 试验的水井滤网内,地下水流量最大。在水井附近,也就是安装加热 FO 电缆的地方,地下水流量较低,水流模式由汇聚和发散流线组成。因此,加热 FO 电缆相对于水流方向的位置至关重要,会对地下水通量的估算产生重大影响。因此,即使在砾石堆内布设 FO 电缆可最大限度地减少对流效应,并为估算垂直异质性开辟了有趣的视角,但如果 FO 电缆相对于流动方向的位置不是很清楚,这种方法也会受到限制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Hydrogeology Journal
Hydrogeology Journal 地学-地球科学综合
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
7.10%
发文量
128
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Hydrogeology Journal was founded in 1992 to foster understanding of hydrogeology; to describe worldwide progress in hydrogeology; and to provide an accessible forum for scientists, researchers, engineers, and practitioners in developing and industrialized countries. Since then, the journal has earned a large worldwide readership. Its peer-reviewed research articles integrate subsurface hydrology and geology with supporting disciplines: geochemistry, geophysics, geomorphology, geobiology, surface-water hydrology, tectonics, numerical modeling, economics, and sociology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信