Exploring the nature of peer feedback: An epistemic network analysis approach

IF 5.1 2区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Olga Viberg, Martine Baars, Rafael Ferreira Mello, Niels Weerheim, Daniel Spikol, Cristian Bogdan, Dragan Gasevic, Fred Paas
{"title":"Exploring the nature of peer feedback: An epistemic network analysis approach","authors":"Olga Viberg,&nbsp;Martine Baars,&nbsp;Rafael Ferreira Mello,&nbsp;Niels Weerheim,&nbsp;Daniel Spikol,&nbsp;Cristian Bogdan,&nbsp;Dragan Gasevic,&nbsp;Fred Paas","doi":"10.1111/jcal.13035","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background Study</h3>\n \n <p>Peer feedback has been used as an effective instructional strategy to enhance students' learning in higher education.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>This paper reports on the findings of an explorative study that aimed to increase our understanding of the nature and role of peer feedback in the students' learning process in a computer-supported collaborative learning (CSCL) setting. Exploring what types of feedback are used, and how they relate to each other and are related to academic performance has important implications for students and teachers.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>This study was conducted in the higher education setting. It used a dataset consisting of student peer feedback messages (<i>N</i> = 2444) and grades from 231 students who participated in a large engineering course. Using qualitative methods, peer feedback was coded inductively. Epistemic network analysis (ENA) was used to analyse the relation between peer feedback types and performance.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Based on the five types of peer feedback (i.e., ‘management’, ‘cognition’ ‘affect’, ‘interpersonal factors’ and ‘suggestions for improvements’), the results of the ENA showed that student feedback categories ‘management’, ‘cognition’ and ‘affect’ were positively related to student performance at the formative assessment phase.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>The findings and the ENA visualizations also show that ‘suggestions for improvement’ and ‘interpersonal factors’ were not a significant part of student learning in peer assessment and feedback in the studied context.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":48071,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Computer Assisted Learning","volume":"40 6","pages":"2809-2821"},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jcal.13035","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Computer Assisted Learning","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jcal.13035","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background Study

Peer feedback has been used as an effective instructional strategy to enhance students' learning in higher education.

Objectives

This paper reports on the findings of an explorative study that aimed to increase our understanding of the nature and role of peer feedback in the students' learning process in a computer-supported collaborative learning (CSCL) setting. Exploring what types of feedback are used, and how they relate to each other and are related to academic performance has important implications for students and teachers.

Methods

This study was conducted in the higher education setting. It used a dataset consisting of student peer feedback messages (N = 2444) and grades from 231 students who participated in a large engineering course. Using qualitative methods, peer feedback was coded inductively. Epistemic network analysis (ENA) was used to analyse the relation between peer feedback types and performance.

Results

Based on the five types of peer feedback (i.e., ‘management’, ‘cognition’ ‘affect’, ‘interpersonal factors’ and ‘suggestions for improvements’), the results of the ENA showed that student feedback categories ‘management’, ‘cognition’ and ‘affect’ were positively related to student performance at the formative assessment phase.

Conclusions

The findings and the ENA visualizations also show that ‘suggestions for improvement’ and ‘interpersonal factors’ were not a significant part of student learning in peer assessment and feedback in the studied context.

Abstract Image

探索同伴反馈的本质:认识论网络分析方法
本文报告了一项探索性研究的结果,该研究旨在加深我们对计算机支持的协作学习(CSCL)环境中学生学习过程中同伴反馈的性质和作用的理解。探索使用了哪些类型的反馈,以及它们之间的关系和与学习成绩的关系,对学生和教师都有重要意义。研究使用的数据集包括学生同伴反馈信息(N = 2444)和来自 231 名参加大型工程课程的学生的成绩。采用定性方法对同学反馈进行归纳编码。采用认识网络分析(ENA)来分析同伴反馈类型与成绩之间的关系、结果基于五种同伴反馈类型(即 "管理"、"认知"、"情感"、"人际因素 "和 "改进建议"),ENA 的结果显示,学生反馈类别 "管理"、"认知 "和 "情感 "与学生在形成性评估阶段的表现呈正相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Computer Assisted Learning
Journal of Computer Assisted Learning EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
9.70
自引率
6.00%
发文量
116
期刊介绍: The Journal of Computer Assisted Learning is an international peer-reviewed journal which covers the whole range of uses of information and communication technology to support learning and knowledge exchange. It aims to provide a medium for communication among researchers as well as a channel linking researchers, practitioners, and policy makers. JCAL is also a rich source of material for master and PhD students in areas such as educational psychology, the learning sciences, instructional technology, instructional design, collaborative learning, intelligent learning systems, learning analytics, open, distance and networked learning, and educational evaluation and assessment. This is the case for formal (e.g., schools), non-formal (e.g., workplace learning) and informal learning (e.g., museums and libraries) situations and environments. Volumes often include one Special Issue which these provides readers with a broad and in-depth perspective on a specific topic. First published in 1985, JCAL continues to have the aim of making the outcomes of contemporary research and experience accessible. During this period there have been major technological advances offering new opportunities and approaches in the use of a wide range of technologies to support learning and knowledge transfer more generally. There is currently much emphasis on the use of network functionality and the challenges its appropriate uses pose to teachers/tutors working with students locally and at a distance. JCAL welcomes: -Empirical reports, single studies or programmatic series of studies on the use of computers and information technologies in learning and assessment -Critical and original meta-reviews of literature on the use of computers for learning -Empirical studies on the design and development of innovative technology-based systems for learning -Conceptual articles on issues relating to the Aims and Scope
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信