Collective Upkeep

Erik Madsen, Eran Shmaya
{"title":"Collective Upkeep","authors":"Erik Madsen, Eran Shmaya","doi":"arxiv-2407.05196","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We design mechanisms for maintaining public goods which require periodic\nnon-monetary contributions. Utilitarian welfare is maximized by concentrating\ncontributions among low-cost group members, but such policies generally induce\nsome members to leave the group or misreport their preferences. To forestall\nexit, contributions must be shifted from members with intermediate costs to\nsome high-cost members. To deter misreporting, members must be screened using\nup to two membership tiers, which reward larger contributions with increased\naccess to the good. We apply our results to the design of platforms such as\nNetflix and TikTok hosting crowd-sourced recommendation engines, which function\nas public goods supported by user feedback about new content.","PeriodicalId":501188,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - ECON - Theoretical Economics","volume":"28 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - ECON - Theoretical Economics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2407.05196","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We design mechanisms for maintaining public goods which require periodic non-monetary contributions. Utilitarian welfare is maximized by concentrating contributions among low-cost group members, but such policies generally induce some members to leave the group or misreport their preferences. To forestall exit, contributions must be shifted from members with intermediate costs to some high-cost members. To deter misreporting, members must be screened using up to two membership tiers, which reward larger contributions with increased access to the good. We apply our results to the design of platforms such as Netflix and TikTok hosting crowd-sourced recommendation engines, which function as public goods supported by user feedback about new content.
集体维护
我们设计了需要定期非货币捐助的公共物品维护机制。将捐款集中给低成本成员,可以实现功利主义福利最大化,但这种政策通常会诱使一些成员离开群体或误报他们的偏好。为了避免出现这种情况,必须将中间成本成员的捐款转移给一些高成本成员。为了阻止虚报,必须使用多达两个成员等级对成员进行筛选,奖励贡献较大的成员,增加他们获得物品的机会。我们将我们的研究结果应用于诸如 Netflix 和 TikTok 等平台的设计,这些平台承载着众包推荐引擎,通过用户对新内容的反馈来实现公共产品的功能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信