Structural transformation of the Indian states: heterogeneity among them in a ten-sector economy

IF 0.8 Q4 DEVELOPMENT STUDIES
Thasni T., Kausik Gangopadhyay, Debasis Mondal
{"title":"Structural transformation of the Indian states: heterogeneity among them in a ten-sector economy","authors":"Thasni T., Kausik Gangopadhyay, Debasis Mondal","doi":"10.1108/igdr-10-2023-0178","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Purpose</h3>\n<p>This paper aims to analyse the pattern of structural transformation and productivity growth of 15 major Indian states at a ten-sector level of disaggregation from 1983 to 2017.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\n<p>The analysis has been carried over in a ten-sector disaggregated level through construction of the labour and output data from various micro data sets.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Findings</h3>\n<p>The majority of Indian states have bypassed the stage of industrialization, wherein labour previously engaged in agriculture has transitioned directly into the modern services sector while skipping the manufacturing. There are no sign of convergence of sectoral productivities and the heterogeneity among Indian states persists throughout the time period. The growth performance of states are not positively associated with the movement of labour across sectors as measured by the structural transformation index (STI). This goes against the narrative that structural transformation help reduce the misallocation of factors. Despite an increase in educational attainment of workers across all sectors, more than one-third of agricultural workers still remain either illiterate or lack formal schooling. Among sectors, construction (C) and trade, hotels and restaurants (THR) have absorbed the majority of workers who have left agricultural jobs. Finance, insurance, real estate and business services (FIRB), electricity, gas and water supply (EGWS) and mining and quarrying (MQ) are the three sectors that have seen significant gains in labour productivity during the study period.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\n<p>To the best of the authors’ knowledge, this is the first attempt to analyse structural change and productivity growth in the Indian economy using Indian states as critical geographical marker. The results are new and add value to the literature.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->","PeriodicalId":42861,"journal":{"name":"Indian Growth and Development Review","volume":"16 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Growth and Development Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/igdr-10-2023-0178","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"DEVELOPMENT STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

This paper aims to analyse the pattern of structural transformation and productivity growth of 15 major Indian states at a ten-sector level of disaggregation from 1983 to 2017.

Design/methodology/approach

The analysis has been carried over in a ten-sector disaggregated level through construction of the labour and output data from various micro data sets.

Findings

The majority of Indian states have bypassed the stage of industrialization, wherein labour previously engaged in agriculture has transitioned directly into the modern services sector while skipping the manufacturing. There are no sign of convergence of sectoral productivities and the heterogeneity among Indian states persists throughout the time period. The growth performance of states are not positively associated with the movement of labour across sectors as measured by the structural transformation index (STI). This goes against the narrative that structural transformation help reduce the misallocation of factors. Despite an increase in educational attainment of workers across all sectors, more than one-third of agricultural workers still remain either illiterate or lack formal schooling. Among sectors, construction (C) and trade, hotels and restaurants (THR) have absorbed the majority of workers who have left agricultural jobs. Finance, insurance, real estate and business services (FIRB), electricity, gas and water supply (EGWS) and mining and quarrying (MQ) are the three sectors that have seen significant gains in labour productivity during the study period.

Originality/value

To the best of the authors’ knowledge, this is the first attempt to analyse structural change and productivity growth in the Indian economy using Indian states as critical geographical marker. The results are new and add value to the literature.

印度各邦的结构转型:十部门经济中各邦之间的异质性
本文旨在分析 1983 年至 2017 年期间印度 15 个主要邦在十个部门分类层面上的结构转型模式和生产率增长。部门生产率没有趋同的迹象,印度各邦之间的异质性在整个时期内持续存在。各邦的增长表现与结构转型指数(STI)衡量的劳动力跨部门流动没有正相关。这与结构转型有助于减少要素配置不当的说法背道而驰。尽管所有部门工人的受教育程度都有所提高,但超过三分之一的农业工人仍然是文盲或没有接受过正规教育。在各行业中,建筑业(C)和贸易、酒店及餐饮业(THR)吸纳了大部分离开农业岗位的工人。金融、保险、房地产和商业服务业(FIRB)、电力、天然气和供水业(EGWS)以及采矿和采石业(MQ)是研究期间劳动生产率显著提高的三个行业。研究结果是全新的,为相关文献增添了价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信