Evaluating synthetic aperture radar surface winds for convective squalls in the Gulf of Mexico

IF 3 3区 地球科学 Q2 METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES
Tran Vu La, Christophe Messager
{"title":"Evaluating synthetic aperture radar surface winds for convective squalls in the Gulf of Mexico","authors":"Tran Vu La, Christophe Messager","doi":"10.1002/qj.4810","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The detection and quantification of strong sea surface winds, reaching up to 25 m·s<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup>, whether associated with deep convection aloft or not, have been extensively discussed in previous studies. This method involves the combined observation of the same event from both low‐orbit altitude and geostationary (GEO) satellites. Strong surface winds observed by the Sentinel‐1 C‐band synthetic aperture radar (SAR) are robustly associated with deep convective clouds detected by GEO infrared sensors. The current paper aims to generalize the previous assessment of several convective wind events by collecting a larger dataset and comparing these data to in‐situ wind observations. To achieve this, we evaluated wind speeds retrieved from Sentinel‐1 SAR images against corresponding in‐situ wind measurements from all active buoys/stations in the Gulf of Mexico. Significant agreement between satellite‐based winds and in‐situ data was achieved, particularly for wind speeds exceeding 3 m·s<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup>, with even better agreement for wind speeds over 10 m·s<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup>. From this dataset, three specific convective cases were extracted to illustrate various stages of convective squall events: before, during, and after the occurrence of a squall peak. In each case, comparison with in‐situ measurements showed that SAR‐estimated wind speeds closely matched observed speeds, including the peak convective winds, which were estimated at 18.90 m·s<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup> and measured at 20.69 m·s<jats:sup>−1</jats:sup>. Furthermore, combining these findings with GOES‐16 sequential images illustrates the temporal and spatial similarity between deep convection areas, estimated strong sea surface wind patterns, and measured wind speeds.","PeriodicalId":49646,"journal":{"name":"Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/qj.4810","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The detection and quantification of strong sea surface winds, reaching up to 25 m·s−1, whether associated with deep convection aloft or not, have been extensively discussed in previous studies. This method involves the combined observation of the same event from both low‐orbit altitude and geostationary (GEO) satellites. Strong surface winds observed by the Sentinel‐1 C‐band synthetic aperture radar (SAR) are robustly associated with deep convective clouds detected by GEO infrared sensors. The current paper aims to generalize the previous assessment of several convective wind events by collecting a larger dataset and comparing these data to in‐situ wind observations. To achieve this, we evaluated wind speeds retrieved from Sentinel‐1 SAR images against corresponding in‐situ wind measurements from all active buoys/stations in the Gulf of Mexico. Significant agreement between satellite‐based winds and in‐situ data was achieved, particularly for wind speeds exceeding 3 m·s−1, with even better agreement for wind speeds over 10 m·s−1. From this dataset, three specific convective cases were extracted to illustrate various stages of convective squall events: before, during, and after the occurrence of a squall peak. In each case, comparison with in‐situ measurements showed that SAR‐estimated wind speeds closely matched observed speeds, including the peak convective winds, which were estimated at 18.90 m·s−1 and measured at 20.69 m·s−1. Furthermore, combining these findings with GOES‐16 sequential images illustrates the temporal and spatial similarity between deep convection areas, estimated strong sea surface wind patterns, and measured wind speeds.
评估墨西哥湾对流暴风的合成孔径雷达表面风速
以往的研究广泛讨论了如何探测和量化高达 25 米-秒-1 的海面强风,无论其是否与高空的深层对流有关。这种方法包括从低轨道高度卫星和地球静止卫星对同一事件进行联合观测。哨兵-1 号 C 波段合成孔径雷达观测到的强地表风与地球同步轨道红外感应器探测到的深对流云密切相关。本文旨在通过收集更大的数据集,并将这些数据与现场风力观测数据进行比较,从而推广之前对一些对流风事件的评估。为此,我们将从哨兵-1 号合成孔径雷达图像中获取的风速与墨西哥湾所有活动浮标/站的相应现场风速测量值进行了对比评估。卫星测得的风速与现场数据的吻合度很高,尤其是风速超过 3 米-秒-1 时,而风速超过 10 米-秒-1 时的吻合度更高。从这一数据集中提取了三个具体的对流案例,以说明对流骤变事件的各个阶段:骤变峰出现之前、期间和之后。在每种情况下,与现场测量结果进行比较后发现,合成孔径雷达估算的风速与观测到的风速非常吻合,包括对流峰值风速,估算风速为 18.90 m-s-1,测量风速为 20.69 m-s-1。此外,将这些发现与 GOES-16 序列图像相结合,可以说明深层对流区、估计的海面强风模式和测量风速之间在时间和空间上的相似性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
16.80
自引率
4.50%
发文量
163
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society is a journal published by the Royal Meteorological Society. It aims to communicate and document new research in the atmospheric sciences and related fields. The journal is considered one of the leading publications in meteorology worldwide. It accepts articles, comprehensive review articles, and comments on published papers. It is published eight times a year, with additional special issues. The Quarterly Journal has a wide readership of scientists in the atmospheric and related fields. It is indexed and abstracted in various databases, including Advanced Polymers Abstracts, Agricultural Engineering Abstracts, CAB Abstracts, CABDirect, COMPENDEX, CSA Civil Engineering Abstracts, Earthquake Engineering Abstracts, Engineered Materials Abstracts, Science Citation Index, SCOPUS, Web of Science, and more.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信