ASDMG: business topic clustering-based architecture smell detection for microservice granularity

IF 1.7 3区 计算机科学 Q3 COMPUTER SCIENCE, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING
Sixuan Wang, Baoqing Jin, Dongjin Yu, Shuhan Cheng
{"title":"ASDMG: business topic clustering-based architecture smell detection for microservice granularity","authors":"Sixuan Wang, Baoqing Jin, Dongjin Yu, Shuhan Cheng","doi":"10.1007/s11219-024-09681-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Microservices architecture smells can significantly affect the quality of microservices due to poor design decisions, especially the granularity smells of microservice architectures will greatly affect the quality of a microservices architecture. The state-of-the-art methods of microservice architectural granularity detection primarily focus on the service level, which lacks consideration of detailed information such as interfaces, and these methods also lack considerations about semantic information related to business logic, leading to lower accuracy in the detection results. To address these issues, we introduce ASDMG, which takes semantic information within the Abstract Syntax Tree (AST) into consideration, integrating them with data dependency to extract business topic relationships of functions. It performs interface-oriented business topic clustering, allowing comprehensive detection of granularity smells both within individual microservices as well as the overall microservice architecture. Experiments were conducted using 5 open-source microservice systems in different scales and domains. Results show that ASDMG achieves an average precision of 83.41%, an average recall of 95.84%, and an average accuracy of 95.85% in detecting architectural granularity smells. Compared to state-of-the-art methods, it achieves better detection results and can improve the quality of microservice architecture.</p>","PeriodicalId":21827,"journal":{"name":"Software Quality Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Software Quality Journal","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11219-024-09681-5","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Microservices architecture smells can significantly affect the quality of microservices due to poor design decisions, especially the granularity smells of microservice architectures will greatly affect the quality of a microservices architecture. The state-of-the-art methods of microservice architectural granularity detection primarily focus on the service level, which lacks consideration of detailed information such as interfaces, and these methods also lack considerations about semantic information related to business logic, leading to lower accuracy in the detection results. To address these issues, we introduce ASDMG, which takes semantic information within the Abstract Syntax Tree (AST) into consideration, integrating them with data dependency to extract business topic relationships of functions. It performs interface-oriented business topic clustering, allowing comprehensive detection of granularity smells both within individual microservices as well as the overall microservice architecture. Experiments were conducted using 5 open-source microservice systems in different scales and domains. Results show that ASDMG achieves an average precision of 83.41%, an average recall of 95.84%, and an average accuracy of 95.85% in detecting architectural granularity smells. Compared to state-of-the-art methods, it achieves better detection results and can improve the quality of microservice architecture.

Abstract Image

ASDMG:基于业务主题聚类的微服务粒度架构气味检测
由于设计决策失误,微服务架构气味会严重影响微服务的质量,尤其是微服务架构粒度气味会极大地影响微服务架构的质量。最先进的微服务架构粒度检测方法主要集中在服务层面,缺乏对接口等详细信息的考虑,而且这些方法也缺乏对业务逻辑相关语义信息的考虑,导致检测结果的准确性较低。为了解决这些问题,我们引入了 ASDMG,它考虑了抽象语法树(AST)中的语义信息,并将其与数据依赖性相结合,以提取函数的业务主题关系。它可执行面向接口的业务主题聚类,从而全面检测单个微服务以及整体微服务架构中的粒度气味。我们使用 5 个不同规模和领域的开源微服务系统进行了实验。结果表明,在检测架构粒度气味方面,ASDMG 的平均精确度为 83.41%,平均召回率为 95.84%,平均准确率为 95.85%。与最先进的方法相比,它能获得更好的检测结果,并能提高微服务架构的质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Software Quality Journal
Software Quality Journal 工程技术-计算机:软件工程
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
5.30%
发文量
26
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The aims of the Software Quality Journal are: (1) To promote awareness of the crucial role of quality management in the effective construction of the software systems developed, used, and/or maintained by organizations in pursuit of their business objectives. (2) To provide a forum of the exchange of experiences and information on software quality management and the methods, tools and products used to measure and achieve it. (3) To provide a vehicle for the publication of academic papers related to all aspects of software quality. The Journal addresses all aspects of software quality from both a practical and an academic viewpoint. It invites contributions from practitioners and academics, as well as national and international policy and standard making bodies, and sets out to be the definitive international reference source for such information. The Journal will accept research, technique, case study, survey and tutorial submissions that address quality-related issues including, but not limited to: internal and external quality standards, management of quality within organizations, technical aspects of quality, quality aspects for product vendors, software measurement and metrics, software testing and other quality assurance techniques, total quality management and cultural aspects. Other technical issues with regard to software quality, including: data management, formal methods, safety critical applications, and CASE.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信