Unwinding Toxic Flow with Partial Information

Alexander Barzykin, Robert Boyce, Eyal Neuman
{"title":"Unwinding Toxic Flow with Partial Information","authors":"Alexander Barzykin, Robert Boyce, Eyal Neuman","doi":"arxiv-2407.04510","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We consider a central trading desk which aggregates the inflow of clients'\norders with unobserved toxicity, i.e. persistent adverse directionality. The\ndesk chooses either to internalise the inflow or externalise it to the market\nin a cost effective manner. In this model, externalising the order flow creates\nboth price impact costs and an additional market feedback reaction for the\ninflow of trades. The desk's objective is to maximise the daily trading P&L\nsubject to end of the day inventory penalization. We formulate this setting as\na partially observable stochastic control problem and solve it in two steps.\nFirst, we derive the filtered dynamics of the inventory and toxicity, projected\nto the observed filtration, which turns the stochastic control problem into a\nfully observed problem. Then we use a variational approach in order to derive\nthe unique optimal trading strategy. We illustrate our results for various\nscenarios in which the desk is facing momentum and mean-reverting toxicity. Our\nimplementation shows that the P&L performance gap between the partially\nobservable problem and the full information case are of order $0.01\\%$ in all\ntested scenarios.","PeriodicalId":501478,"journal":{"name":"arXiv - QuantFin - Trading and Market Microstructure","volume":"366 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"arXiv - QuantFin - Trading and Market Microstructure","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/arxiv-2407.04510","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We consider a central trading desk which aggregates the inflow of clients' orders with unobserved toxicity, i.e. persistent adverse directionality. The desk chooses either to internalise the inflow or externalise it to the market in a cost effective manner. In this model, externalising the order flow creates both price impact costs and an additional market feedback reaction for the inflow of trades. The desk's objective is to maximise the daily trading P&L subject to end of the day inventory penalization. We formulate this setting as a partially observable stochastic control problem and solve it in two steps. First, we derive the filtered dynamics of the inventory and toxicity, projected to the observed filtration, which turns the stochastic control problem into a fully observed problem. Then we use a variational approach in order to derive the unique optimal trading strategy. We illustrate our results for various scenarios in which the desk is facing momentum and mean-reverting toxicity. Our implementation shows that the P&L performance gap between the partially observable problem and the full information case are of order $0.01\%$ in all tested scenarios.
利用部分信息释放毒流
我们考虑的是一个中央交易台,该交易台汇集了客户的订单流入,这些订单具有无法观察到的毒性,即持续的不利方向性。该交易台选择将流入的订单内部化,还是以符合成本效益的方式将其外部化。在该模型中,订单流外部化既产生了价格影响成本,也为交易流入带来了额外的市场反馈反应。交易台的目标是在日终库存惩罚的前提下,实现每日交易损益的最大化。首先,我们推导出库存和毒性的过滤动态,并将其投射到观察到的过滤中,从而将随机控制问题转化为完全观察问题。然后,我们使用变分法推导出唯一的最优交易策略。我们将在不同的情况下对结果进行说明,在这些情况下,交易台面临的是动量和均值回复毒性。我们的实施结果表明,在所有测试场景中,部分可观测问题与完全信息情况下的损益表现差距都在 0.01 美元/%$。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信