Erectile Dysfunction and Cardiovascular Disease Risk: An Updated 2024 Systematic Review Meta-Analysis of Prospective Studies

Julian Yin Vieira Borges
{"title":"Erectile Dysfunction and Cardiovascular Disease Risk: An Updated 2024 Systematic Review Meta-Analysis of Prospective Studies","authors":"Julian Yin Vieira Borges","doi":"10.1101/2024.07.06.24310031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract\nBackground: Erectile dysfunction (ED) has been suggested to be associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD), including coronary artery disease, stroke, and cardiovascular mortality This meta-analysis aims to investigate the relationship between ED and CVD risk using PRISMA 2020 guidelines for reporting systematic reviews and evaluate the risk of specific cardiovascular events such as coronary artery disease (CAD), myocardial infarction (MI), stroke, and cardiovascular mortality. Methods: A systematic literature search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases from January 2009 to December 2023. Studies were selected based on predefined inclusion criteria. Data extraction and quality assessment were performed independently by two reviewers. Pooled relative risks (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using a random-effects model. Heterogeneity was assessed using the I statistic and Q test. For the assessment of certainty were used the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) approach to assess the certainty of evidence for each outcome. The GRADE approach evaluates evidence based on five domains: risk of bias, inconsistency, indirectness, imprecision, and publication bias. Each domain can lead to downgrading the certainty of evidence by one or two levels. The overall certainty of evidence was classified as high, moderate, low, or very low. Results: This updated meta-analysis of prospective studies provides robust evidence that ED was found to be an independent risk factor for CVD outcomes, including coronary artery disease, stroke, and cardiovascular mortality. Clinicians should consider early identification and management of ED, such initiative has great potential to improve cardiovascular risk and using it as stratification criteria would help CVD prevention strategies in men. Keywords: erectile dysfunction, cardiovascular disease, coronary artery disease, stroke, cardiovascular mortality, risk factors, endothelial dysfunction, meta-analysis","PeriodicalId":501140,"journal":{"name":"medRxiv - Urology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"medRxiv - Urology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.07.06.24310031","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Background: Erectile dysfunction (ED) has been suggested to be associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD), including coronary artery disease, stroke, and cardiovascular mortality This meta-analysis aims to investigate the relationship between ED and CVD risk using PRISMA 2020 guidelines for reporting systematic reviews and evaluate the risk of specific cardiovascular events such as coronary artery disease (CAD), myocardial infarction (MI), stroke, and cardiovascular mortality. Methods: A systematic literature search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases from January 2009 to December 2023. Studies were selected based on predefined inclusion criteria. Data extraction and quality assessment were performed independently by two reviewers. Pooled relative risks (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using a random-effects model. Heterogeneity was assessed using the I statistic and Q test. For the assessment of certainty were used the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) approach to assess the certainty of evidence for each outcome. The GRADE approach evaluates evidence based on five domains: risk of bias, inconsistency, indirectness, imprecision, and publication bias. Each domain can lead to downgrading the certainty of evidence by one or two levels. The overall certainty of evidence was classified as high, moderate, low, or very low. Results: This updated meta-analysis of prospective studies provides robust evidence that ED was found to be an independent risk factor for CVD outcomes, including coronary artery disease, stroke, and cardiovascular mortality. Clinicians should consider early identification and management of ED, such initiative has great potential to improve cardiovascular risk and using it as stratification criteria would help CVD prevention strategies in men. Keywords: erectile dysfunction, cardiovascular disease, coronary artery disease, stroke, cardiovascular mortality, risk factors, endothelial dysfunction, meta-analysis
勃起功能障碍与心血管疾病风险:2024 年前瞻性研究的最新系统综述和元分析
摘要背景:勃起功能障碍(ED)被认为与心血管疾病(CVD)(包括冠状动脉疾病、中风和心血管疾病死亡率)风险的增加有关。本荟萃分析旨在采用PRISMA 2020系统综述报告指南研究ED与CVD风险之间的关系,并评估特定心血管事件(如冠状动脉疾病(CAD)、心肌梗死(MI)、中风和心血管疾病死亡率)的风险。研究方法从 2009 年 1 月到 2023 年 12 月,在 PubMed、Embase、Cochrane Library 和 Web of Science 数据库中进行了系统的文献检索。根据预先确定的纳入标准筛选研究。数据提取和质量评估由两名审稿人独立完成。采用随机效应模型计算汇总相对风险 (RR) 及 95% 置信区间 (CI)。异质性采用 I 统计量和 Q 检验进行评估。对于确定性的评估,我们采用 GRADE(建议评估、发展和评价分级)方法来评估每项结果的证据确定性。GRADE 方法根据五个方面对证据进行评估:偏倚风险、不一致性、间接性、不精确性和发表偏倚。每个领域都可能导致证据的确定性降低一个或两个等级。证据的总体确定性分为高、中、低或极低。结果:这项最新的前瞻性研究荟萃分析提供了强有力的证据,证明 ED 是导致心血管疾病(包括冠心病、中风和心血管疾病死亡率)的独立危险因素。临床医生应考虑早期识别和管理ED,这一举措具有改善心血管风险的巨大潜力,将其作为分层标准将有助于男性心血管疾病的预防策略。关键词:勃起功能障碍、心血管疾病、冠心病、中风、心血管疾病死亡率、风险因素、内皮功能障碍、荟萃分析
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信