ANN‐based analysis of the effect of SCM on recycled aggregate concrete

IF 3 3区 工程技术 Q2 CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY
Carlos H. Mosquera, Melissa P. Acosta, William A. Rodríguez, Diego A. Mejía‐España, Jonhatan R. Torres, Daniela M. Martinez, Joaquín Abellán‐García
{"title":"ANN‐based analysis of the effect of SCM on recycled aggregate concrete","authors":"Carlos H. Mosquera, Melissa P. Acosta, William A. Rodríguez, Diego A. Mejía‐España, Jonhatan R. Torres, Daniela M. Martinez, Joaquín Abellán‐García","doi":"10.1002/suco.202400024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Rising environmental awareness has prompted in‐depth studies on how the concrete industry affects the environment. Using recycled concrete aggregates (RCAs) and supplementary cementitious materials (SCMs) in concrete manufacturing provides advantages for sustainability. However, the broader chemical composition of SCMs and the inferior qualities of RCAs compared with natural aggregates (NAs) often lead to a decrease in concrete mechanical strength. The difficulty lies in foreseeing how the inclusion of SCMs and RCAs will affect the concrete compressive strength. The artificial neural network (ANN) approach presented herein can precisely forecast the recycled aggregate concrete (RAC) compressive strength, even when incorporates SCMs. The analysis employing the connection weight approach (CWA) determines how input variables influence compressive strength. Results indicate silica fume contributes most to compressive strength, followed by cement content, silica modulus, fine natural aggregate dosage, and coarse natural aggregate. Additionally, the amount of water utilized, the water/cement ratio, and the presence of RCA are all detrimental to compressive strength. The adverse effect of the cementitious materials' alumina modulus can be attributed to increased water demand during their reaction. Performance metrics of the final ANN model on the testing data subset include <jats:italic>R</jats:italic><jats:sup>2</jats:sup> = 0.94, and RMSE = 3.11, utilizing 834 data observations after outlier treatment for training and validation purposes. In summary, the ANN‐based approach demonstrates its efficacy in predicting concrete compressive strength when incorporating SCMs and RCAs, shedding light on the influential factors in concrete performance.","PeriodicalId":21988,"journal":{"name":"Structural Concrete","volume":"14 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Structural Concrete","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/suco.202400024","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Rising environmental awareness has prompted in‐depth studies on how the concrete industry affects the environment. Using recycled concrete aggregates (RCAs) and supplementary cementitious materials (SCMs) in concrete manufacturing provides advantages for sustainability. However, the broader chemical composition of SCMs and the inferior qualities of RCAs compared with natural aggregates (NAs) often lead to a decrease in concrete mechanical strength. The difficulty lies in foreseeing how the inclusion of SCMs and RCAs will affect the concrete compressive strength. The artificial neural network (ANN) approach presented herein can precisely forecast the recycled aggregate concrete (RAC) compressive strength, even when incorporates SCMs. The analysis employing the connection weight approach (CWA) determines how input variables influence compressive strength. Results indicate silica fume contributes most to compressive strength, followed by cement content, silica modulus, fine natural aggregate dosage, and coarse natural aggregate. Additionally, the amount of water utilized, the water/cement ratio, and the presence of RCA are all detrimental to compressive strength. The adverse effect of the cementitious materials' alumina modulus can be attributed to increased water demand during their reaction. Performance metrics of the final ANN model on the testing data subset include R2 = 0.94, and RMSE = 3.11, utilizing 834 data observations after outlier treatment for training and validation purposes. In summary, the ANN‐based approach demonstrates its efficacy in predicting concrete compressive strength when incorporating SCMs and RCAs, shedding light on the influential factors in concrete performance.
基于 ANN 的单层混凝土对再生骨料混凝土影响的分析
环保意识的提高促使人们深入研究混凝土行业如何影响环境。在混凝土生产中使用再生混凝土骨料(RCA)和胶凝补充材料(SCM)具有可持续发展的优势。然而,与天然骨料(NA)相比,SCM 的化学成分较广,而 RCA 的质量较差,这往往会导致混凝土机械强度下降。难点在于如何预测 SCM 和 RCA 的加入对混凝土抗压强度的影响。本文介绍的人工神经网络(ANN)方法可以精确预测再生骨料混凝土(RAC)的抗压强度,即使在加入 SCM 时也是如此。采用连接权重法 (CWA) 进行的分析确定了输入变量对抗压强度的影响。结果表明,硅灰对抗压强度的影响最大,其次是水泥含量、硅模量、细天然骨料用量和粗天然骨料。此外,用水量、水灰比和 RCA 的存在都会对抗压强度产生不利影响。胶凝材料氧化铝模量的不利影响可归因于其反应过程中需水量的增加。测试数据子集上的最终 ANN 模型的性能指标包括 R2 = 0.94 和 RMSE = 3.11,利用离群点处理后的 834 个数据观测值进行训练和验证。总之,在加入 SCM 和 RCA 时,基于 ANN 的方法证明了其在预测混凝土抗压强度方面的有效性,并揭示了混凝土性能的影响因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Structural Concrete
Structural Concrete CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY-ENGINEERING, CIVIL
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
15.60%
发文量
284
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Structural Concrete, the official journal of the fib, provides conceptual and procedural guidance in the field of concrete construction, and features peer-reviewed papers, keynote research and industry news covering all aspects of the design, construction, performance in service and demolition of concrete structures. Main topics: design, construction, performance in service, conservation (assessment, maintenance, strengthening) and demolition of concrete structures research about the behaviour of concrete structures development of design methods fib Model Code sustainability of concrete structures.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信