Cross‐national governmental treatment toward atheists since 1816

IF 1.8 3区 社会学 Q2 SOCIOLOGY
Justin Huft, Ben Fields
{"title":"Cross‐national governmental treatment toward atheists since 1816","authors":"Justin Huft, Ben Fields","doi":"10.1111/socf.13009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"As the atheist population grows globally, understanding how governments treat the growing population is vital. Two theories, group threat theory (GTT) and world society theory (WST), offer differing predictions. GTT suggests increasing atheists may face unfavorable treatment because religious groups perceive them as a threat. Conversely, WST proposes that a more interconnected world culture advances secularism, which promotes positive treatment for atheists. This study explores the interplay between these theories and sheds light on how governments treat atheists across countries. Utilizing a comprehensive panel dataset spanning nearly 200 years, we investigate governmental treatment toward atheists, analyzing data from diverse countries and tracking changes over time. Our results reveal that as the proportion of atheists increases, their treatment by governments becomes more favorable, challenging the tenets of GTT. We also find that embeddedness in political or economic networks is related to more favorable treatment of atheists.","PeriodicalId":21904,"journal":{"name":"Sociological Forum","volume":"2015 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sociological Forum","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/socf.13009","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

As the atheist population grows globally, understanding how governments treat the growing population is vital. Two theories, group threat theory (GTT) and world society theory (WST), offer differing predictions. GTT suggests increasing atheists may face unfavorable treatment because religious groups perceive them as a threat. Conversely, WST proposes that a more interconnected world culture advances secularism, which promotes positive treatment for atheists. This study explores the interplay between these theories and sheds light on how governments treat atheists across countries. Utilizing a comprehensive panel dataset spanning nearly 200 years, we investigate governmental treatment toward atheists, analyzing data from diverse countries and tracking changes over time. Our results reveal that as the proportion of atheists increases, their treatment by governments becomes more favorable, challenging the tenets of GTT. We also find that embeddedness in political or economic networks is related to more favorable treatment of atheists.
1816 年以来各国政府对待无神论者的态度
随着全球无神论者人数的增长,了解政府如何对待不断增长的人群至关重要。群体威胁理论(GTT)和世界社会理论(WST)这两种理论提出了不同的预测。GTT 认为,越来越多的无神论者可能会面临不利的待遇,因为宗教团体认为他们是一种威胁。与此相反,世界社会理论则认为,相互联系更紧密的世界文化会推进世俗主义,从而促进无神论者获得积极的待遇。本研究探讨了这些理论之间的相互作用,并揭示了各国政府如何对待无神论者。我们利用跨越近 200 年的综合面板数据集,调查了政府对待无神论者的方式,分析了来自不同国家的数据,并跟踪了随着时间推移发生的变化。我们的研究结果表明,随着无神论者比例的增加,政府对他们的待遇也越来越好,这对 GTT 的信条提出了挑战。我们还发现,政治或经济网络的嵌入性与无神论者获得更有利的待遇有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Sociological Forum
Sociological Forum SOCIOLOGY-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
11.10%
发文量
73
期刊介绍: Sociological Forum is the flagship journal of the Eastern Sociological Society. The journal is peer reviewed and committed to publishing high quality, cutting edge research on substantive issues of fundamental importance to the study of society. The journal"s mission is broad in scope, encompassing empirical works (both quantitative and qualitative in nature), as well as works that develop theories, concepts, and methodological strategies. All areas of sociology and related fields are welcomed in Sociological Forum, as the journal strives to create a site of learning and exchange for scholars and students of the social sciences.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信