Happiness in urban environments: what we know and don’t know yet

IF 1.8 3区 经济学 Q3 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
Sahar Samavati, Ruut Veenhoven
{"title":"Happiness in urban environments: what we know and don’t know yet","authors":"Sahar Samavati, Ruut Veenhoven","doi":"10.1007/s10901-024-10119-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>There is no consensus on what makes for a livable urban environment. This requires empirical assessment of the relationship between urban characteristics and the happiness of residents. We took stock of the available research findings, using the World Database of Happiness; 445 findings are considered, from 20 nations over the years 1975–2022. We considered 3 aspects of the urban environment, 1) objectively assessed characteristics, 2) subjective perception of urban characteristics and 3) satisfaction with urban characteristics. Urbanites tend to be happier in places characterized by the following <i>objectively</i> assessed features: a) access to local green/nature, b) access to cultural facilities and leisure amenities, c) access to healthcare, d) access to public goods such as access to sewage and water supply and e) access to public spaces. On the other hand, residents tend to be <i>less</i> happy the closer they live to f) shops, g) public transportation hubs and h) the city center. Subjectively <i>perceived</i> environmental characteristics that go with greater happiness are: i) amenities, j) public goods in vicinity k) playground and sport facilities, while l) perceived air pollution is negatively linked to happiness. Residents were found to be happier the more <i>satisfied</i> they are with m) connectivity and local transport, n) local recreation o) water quality and the, p) environment as-a-whole. Correlations with <i>objectively</i> assessed characteristics. with the urban environment are smaller than with <i>subjective perceptions</i> of the same and differ in direction for living close to q) shops and r) public transportation hubs. While <i>objective</i> closeness to these amenities relates negatively to happiness, <i>subjectively</i> perceived availability and satisfaction with these amenities relates positively to happiness. Most of the available findings are of a cross-sectional nature and do not inform us about cause and effect. This strand of research is still in its infancy. By lack of a sound evidence base, claims about livability of urban settings will remain a matter of subjective hunches and sales-talk.</p>","PeriodicalId":47558,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Housing and the Built Environment","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Housing and the Built Environment","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10901-024-10119-4","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

There is no consensus on what makes for a livable urban environment. This requires empirical assessment of the relationship between urban characteristics and the happiness of residents. We took stock of the available research findings, using the World Database of Happiness; 445 findings are considered, from 20 nations over the years 1975–2022. We considered 3 aspects of the urban environment, 1) objectively assessed characteristics, 2) subjective perception of urban characteristics and 3) satisfaction with urban characteristics. Urbanites tend to be happier in places characterized by the following objectively assessed features: a) access to local green/nature, b) access to cultural facilities and leisure amenities, c) access to healthcare, d) access to public goods such as access to sewage and water supply and e) access to public spaces. On the other hand, residents tend to be less happy the closer they live to f) shops, g) public transportation hubs and h) the city center. Subjectively perceived environmental characteristics that go with greater happiness are: i) amenities, j) public goods in vicinity k) playground and sport facilities, while l) perceived air pollution is negatively linked to happiness. Residents were found to be happier the more satisfied they are with m) connectivity and local transport, n) local recreation o) water quality and the, p) environment as-a-whole. Correlations with objectively assessed characteristics. with the urban environment are smaller than with subjective perceptions of the same and differ in direction for living close to q) shops and r) public transportation hubs. While objective closeness to these amenities relates negatively to happiness, subjectively perceived availability and satisfaction with these amenities relates positively to happiness. Most of the available findings are of a cross-sectional nature and do not inform us about cause and effect. This strand of research is still in its infancy. By lack of a sound evidence base, claims about livability of urban settings will remain a matter of subjective hunches and sales-talk.

Abstract Image

城市环境中的幸福:我们知道的和不知道的
对于什么是宜居的城市环境,目前还没有达成共识。这就需要对城市特征与居民幸福感之间的关系进行实证评估。我们利用世界幸福数据库(World Database of Happiness)对现有的研究成果进行了总结,其中包括 1975-2022 年间来自 20 个国家的 445 项研究成果。我们考虑了城市环境的三个方面:1)客观评估的特征;2)对城市特征的主观感知;3)对城市特征的满意度。在具有以下客观评估特征的地方,城市居民往往更幸福:a) 能享受当地的绿色/自然;b) 能享受文化设施和休闲设施;c) 能享受医疗保健;d) 能享受公共产品,如污水处理和供水;e) 能享受公共空间。另一方面,居民往往越靠近 f) 商店、g) 公共交通枢纽和 h) 市中心就越不快乐。与幸福感相关的主观感知环境特征包括:i) 便利设施;j) 附近的公共产品;k) 游乐场和体育设施;l) 感知到的空气污染则与幸福感呈负相关。居民对 m) 连接性和当地交通、n) 当地娱乐、o) 水质和 p) 整体环境越满意,幸福感就越高。与主观感受相比,客观评估的城市环境特征与主观感受之间的相关性较小。与这些设施的客观接近程度与幸福感呈负相关,而主观感受到的这些设施的可用性和满意度与幸福感呈正相关。现有的研究结果大多是横断面性质的,并不能告诉我们因果关系。这方面的研究仍处于起步阶段。由于缺乏可靠的证据基础,关于城市环境宜居性的说法仍将是一个主观直觉和推销口号的问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
10.50%
发文量
63
期刊介绍: The Journal of Housing and the Built Environment is a scholarly journal presenting the results of scientific research and new developments in policy and practice to a diverse readership of specialists, practitioners and policy-makers. This refereed journal covers the fields of housing, spatial planning, building and urban development. The journal guarantees high scientific quality by a double blind review procedure. Next to that, the editorial board discusses each article as well. Leading scholars in the field of housing, spatial planning and urban development publish regularly in Journal of Housing and the Built Environment. The journal publishes articles from scientists all over the world, both Western and non-Western, providing a truly international platform for developments in both theory and practice in the fields of housing, spatial planning, building and urban development. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment (HBE) has a wide scope and includes all topics dealing with people-environment relations. Topics concern social relations within the built environment as well as the physicals component of the built environment. As such the journal brings together social science and engineering. HBE is of interest for scientists like housing researchers, social geographers, (urban) planners and architects. Furthermore it presents a forum for practitioners to present their experiences in new developments on policy and practice. Because of its unique structure of research articles and policy and practice contributions, HBE provides a forum where science and practice can be confronted. Finally, each volume of HBE contains one special issue, in which recent developments on one particular topic are discussed in depth. The aim of Journal of Housing and the Built Environment is to give international exposure to recent research and policy and practice developments on the built environment and thereby open up a forum wherein re searchers can exchange ideas and develop contacts. In this way HBE seeks to enhance the quality of research in the field and disseminate the results to a wider audience. Its scope is intended to interest scientists as well as policy-makers, both in government and in organizations dealing with housing and urban issues.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信