Alexis L. Gerber, Hannah Mulligan, Mark A. Kaemingk, Alison A. Coulter
{"title":"Angler knowledge of live bait regulations and invasive species: insights for invasive species prevention","authors":"Alexis L. Gerber, Hannah Mulligan, Mark A. Kaemingk, Alison A. Coulter","doi":"10.1007/s10530-024-03378-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The prevention of aquatic invasive species is one of the most cost-effective management strategies for reducing negative ecological, economic, and social impacts to freshwater ecosystems. The release of leftover baitfish via the live bait trade has been identified as a high-risk pathway for introducing invasive species beyond physical barriers (e.g., mountains, dams). To assess differences in behavior surrounding live bait use and angler knowledge of invasive species, we conducted in-person angler surveys at waterbody access sites (i.e. boat ramps with available shore fishing and a shore fishing location with no boat ramp) along the Missouri River, above and below Gavins Point Dam (Yankton, South Dakota, USA). We were primarily interested in whether angler behavior and knowledge differed among fishing locations over the course of a year because of potential variation in risk. Gavins Point Dam is impervious to fish passage and prevents the spread of invasive silver carp <i>Hypophthalmichthys molitrix</i> and bighead carp <i>H. nobilis</i> (collectively known as bigheaded carp), but bigheaded carp could be transported above this dam by the use of live baitfish. Regardless of where respondents fished (above the dam/carp absent, below the dam/carp present, or both), 70% ± 11.12 of anglers used live baitfish and 57% ± 3.14 participated in ‘higher risk’ baitfish practices including release. Knowledge of bigheaded carp was limited, as only 2% ± 1.31 of respondents identified both bigheaded carp as invasive in an image collage, 51.82% ± 4.48 could not identify where invasive carp are present/absent, and 40% ± 3.34 of anglers had not received any information regarding bigheaded carp. These findings highlight limitations in angler knowledge, compliance, and identification of native and invasive species. Future implementable actions could include invasive species and baitfish release outreach via electronic media sources or additional signage that address these knowledge gaps.</p>","PeriodicalId":9202,"journal":{"name":"Biological Invasions","volume":"61 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biological Invasions","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-024-03378-3","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The prevention of aquatic invasive species is one of the most cost-effective management strategies for reducing negative ecological, economic, and social impacts to freshwater ecosystems. The release of leftover baitfish via the live bait trade has been identified as a high-risk pathway for introducing invasive species beyond physical barriers (e.g., mountains, dams). To assess differences in behavior surrounding live bait use and angler knowledge of invasive species, we conducted in-person angler surveys at waterbody access sites (i.e. boat ramps with available shore fishing and a shore fishing location with no boat ramp) along the Missouri River, above and below Gavins Point Dam (Yankton, South Dakota, USA). We were primarily interested in whether angler behavior and knowledge differed among fishing locations over the course of a year because of potential variation in risk. Gavins Point Dam is impervious to fish passage and prevents the spread of invasive silver carp Hypophthalmichthys molitrix and bighead carp H. nobilis (collectively known as bigheaded carp), but bigheaded carp could be transported above this dam by the use of live baitfish. Regardless of where respondents fished (above the dam/carp absent, below the dam/carp present, or both), 70% ± 11.12 of anglers used live baitfish and 57% ± 3.14 participated in ‘higher risk’ baitfish practices including release. Knowledge of bigheaded carp was limited, as only 2% ± 1.31 of respondents identified both bigheaded carp as invasive in an image collage, 51.82% ± 4.48 could not identify where invasive carp are present/absent, and 40% ± 3.34 of anglers had not received any information regarding bigheaded carp. These findings highlight limitations in angler knowledge, compliance, and identification of native and invasive species. Future implementable actions could include invasive species and baitfish release outreach via electronic media sources or additional signage that address these knowledge gaps.
期刊介绍:
Biological Invasions publishes research and synthesis papers on patterns and processes of biological invasions in terrestrial, freshwater, and marine (including brackish) ecosystems. Also of interest are scholarly papers on management and policy issues as they relate to conservation programs and the global amelioration or control of invasions. The journal will consider proposals for special issues resulting from conferences or workshops on invasions.There are no page charges to publish in this journal.