Multiple biotic factors mediate the invasion success of Chromolaena odorata

IF 2.8 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION
Mingbo Chen, Weitao Li, Yulong Zheng
{"title":"Multiple biotic factors mediate the invasion success of Chromolaena odorata","authors":"Mingbo Chen, Weitao Li, Yulong Zheng","doi":"10.1007/s10530-024-03391-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Community resistance plays a crucial role in the successful invasion of alien plants. However, our understanding of how soil legacy effects of native species richness, parasitic plants, competition and soil microbes contribute to community resistance remain unclear. To compare the legacy effects of soil conditioning and the current effects of plant interactions, we performed an experiment in which <i>Chromolaeana odorata</i> (invader) growth was measured with or without competition on live and sterile soils with different conditioning histories (species richness). Overall, our research indicated that <i>C. odorata</i> outperformed two native species across treatments, however, this advantage was smaller on soils with species rich histories and with competition from current plant growth. Our findings also revealed that both the soil legacy effects of native richness and competition negatively impact the growth of <i>C. odorata</i>, and native plants tend to produce more biomass in soils with greater diversity and under competitive conditions (5.0%). Interestingly, the holoparasitic plant <i>C. chinensis</i> decreased native plant growth (− 40%) more than <i>C. odorata</i> growth (− 11%). Further, <i>C. chinensis</i> did not parasitize <i>C. odorata</i> on sterilized soil. Furthermore, <i>C. odorata</i> did not experience limitations from parasitism in sterilized soil, as indicated by a slight increase in biomass of 2.3%. These results indicated that soils with diverse plant histories, competition from native plants, and lower <i>C. chinensis</i> parasitism will synergistically decrease <i>C. odorata</i> invasion. This study underscores that community resistance to <i>C. odorata</i> is governed by an interplay of multiple biotic factors, both individually and in combination. Simultaneously, this study contributes to a theoretical foundation for understanding the successful invasion of alien plants.</p>","PeriodicalId":9202,"journal":{"name":"Biological Invasions","volume":"24 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biological Invasions","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-024-03391-6","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Community resistance plays a crucial role in the successful invasion of alien plants. However, our understanding of how soil legacy effects of native species richness, parasitic plants, competition and soil microbes contribute to community resistance remain unclear. To compare the legacy effects of soil conditioning and the current effects of plant interactions, we performed an experiment in which Chromolaeana odorata (invader) growth was measured with or without competition on live and sterile soils with different conditioning histories (species richness). Overall, our research indicated that C. odorata outperformed two native species across treatments, however, this advantage was smaller on soils with species rich histories and with competition from current plant growth. Our findings also revealed that both the soil legacy effects of native richness and competition negatively impact the growth of C. odorata, and native plants tend to produce more biomass in soils with greater diversity and under competitive conditions (5.0%). Interestingly, the holoparasitic plant C. chinensis decreased native plant growth (− 40%) more than C. odorata growth (− 11%). Further, C. chinensis did not parasitize C. odorata on sterilized soil. Furthermore, C. odorata did not experience limitations from parasitism in sterilized soil, as indicated by a slight increase in biomass of 2.3%. These results indicated that soils with diverse plant histories, competition from native plants, and lower C. chinensis parasitism will synergistically decrease C. odorata invasion. This study underscores that community resistance to C. odorata is governed by an interplay of multiple biotic factors, both individually and in combination. Simultaneously, this study contributes to a theoretical foundation for understanding the successful invasion of alien plants.

Abstract Image

多种生物因素介导了 Chromolaena odorata 的成功入侵
群落抗性对外来植物的成功入侵起着至关重要的作用。然而,我们对本土物种丰富度、寄生植物、竞争和土壤微生物等土壤遗留效应如何促进群落抗性的认识仍不清楚。为了比较土壤调理的遗留效应和植物相互作用的当前效应,我们进行了一项实验,在具有不同调理历史(物种丰富度)的活土壤和无菌土壤上,在有竞争或无竞争的情况下测量 Chromolaeana odorata(入侵者)的生长情况。总体而言,我们的研究表明,臭椿在各种处理中的表现均优于两种本地物种,但在物种丰富的土壤上以及在当前植物生长的竞争下,这种优势较小。我们的研究结果还表明,土壤中原生物种的丰富性和竞争对臭腥草的生长都有负面影响,而在多样性更强和竞争条件更激烈的土壤中,原生植物往往能产生更多的生物量(5.0%)。有趣的是,全寄生植物盐肤木(C. chinensis)对本地植物生长的影响(- 40%)要大于臭腥草对本地植物生长的影响(- 11%)。此外,在消毒过的土壤中,盐肤木不会寄生臭腥草。此外,臭腥草在灭菌土壤中也没有受到寄生的限制,生物量略微增加了 2.3%。这些结果表明,具有多种植物历史的土壤、本地植物的竞争以及较低的臭椿寄生率将协同减少臭椿的入侵。这项研究强调,群落对臭腥草的抵抗力受多种生物因素单独或共同作用的影响。同时,这项研究也为理解外来植物的成功入侵奠定了理论基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Biological Invasions
Biological Invasions 环境科学-生态学
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
6.90%
发文量
248
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Biological Invasions publishes research and synthesis papers on patterns and processes of biological invasions in terrestrial, freshwater, and marine (including brackish) ecosystems. Also of interest are scholarly papers on management and policy issues as they relate to conservation programs and the global amelioration or control of invasions. The journal will consider proposals for special issues resulting from conferences or workshops on invasions.There are no page charges to publish in this journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信