Integrated approach to assess the environmental suitability of red ceramic waste as a supplementary cementitious material in structural concrete

IF 2.7 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
D. B. B. Gehrke, T. B. Pavesi, A. B. Rohden, M. R. Garcez
{"title":"Integrated approach to assess the environmental suitability of red ceramic waste as a supplementary cementitious material in structural concrete","authors":"D. B. B. Gehrke,&nbsp;T. B. Pavesi,&nbsp;A. B. Rohden,&nbsp;M. R. Garcez","doi":"10.1007/s10163-024-02021-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This paper advances the state-of-the-art on the suitability of using red ceramic waste in structural concrete as a green technology through an integrated approach coupling mechanical, durability, and environmental performance. Environmental impacts and embodied energy were assessed through the life cycle assessment of structural concrete (C30–C40) produced with 5–40% red ceramic waste considering compatible prescriptive mechanical properties and durability requirements for equivalent service life in a low-risk urban environment. Results show that while mechanical properties are preserved with up to 10% cement replacement, environmental impact reductions require 20–40% cement replacement, where the higher the concrete compressive strength, the higher the relative environmental benefits. For concrete mixtures produced with 40% red ceramic waste, the environmental load of C45, C40, and C35 are compatible and lower than that of plain C30. Due to the increasing amount of superplasticizer required to guarantee concrete workability, the environmental benefits of using red ceramic waste are slightly less evident for human toxicity than for other impact categories. The broad applicability of the proposed approach supports design strategies to improve the environmental suitability of reinforced concrete structures and contribute to effectively implementing sustainable practices in the construction industry.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":643,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s10163-024-02021-6.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10163-024-02021-6","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper advances the state-of-the-art on the suitability of using red ceramic waste in structural concrete as a green technology through an integrated approach coupling mechanical, durability, and environmental performance. Environmental impacts and embodied energy were assessed through the life cycle assessment of structural concrete (C30–C40) produced with 5–40% red ceramic waste considering compatible prescriptive mechanical properties and durability requirements for equivalent service life in a low-risk urban environment. Results show that while mechanical properties are preserved with up to 10% cement replacement, environmental impact reductions require 20–40% cement replacement, where the higher the concrete compressive strength, the higher the relative environmental benefits. For concrete mixtures produced with 40% red ceramic waste, the environmental load of C45, C40, and C35 are compatible and lower than that of plain C30. Due to the increasing amount of superplasticizer required to guarantee concrete workability, the environmental benefits of using red ceramic waste are slightly less evident for human toxicity than for other impact categories. The broad applicability of the proposed approach supports design strategies to improve the environmental suitability of reinforced concrete structures and contribute to effectively implementing sustainable practices in the construction industry.

Abstract Image

采用综合方法评估红色陶瓷废料作为结构混凝土中的补充胶凝材料的环境适宜性
本文通过将机械性能、耐久性能和环境性能相结合的综合方法,推进了在结构混凝土中使用红色陶瓷废料这一绿色技术的先进性。通过对使用 5-40% 的红色陶瓷废料生产的结构混凝土(C30-C40)进行生命周期评估,评估了在低风险城市环境中同等使用寿命下兼容的规定机械性能和耐久性要求对环境的影响和体现能源。结果表明,虽然水泥替代率高达 10%可保持机械性能,但减少环境影响需要 20-40% 的水泥替代率,其中混凝土抗压强度越高,相对环境效益越高。对于用 40% 的红色陶瓷废料生产的混凝土混合物,C45、C40 和 C35 的环境负荷是相容的,且低于普通 C30 的环境负荷。由于保证混凝土工作性所需的超塑化剂用量不断增加,使用红色陶瓷废料的环境效益在人体毒性方面略逊于其他影响类别。所建议方法的广泛适用性为改善钢筋混凝土结构环境适应性的设计策略提供了支持,并有助于在建筑行业有效实施可持续发展实践。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
16.10%
发文量
205
审稿时长
4.8 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management has a twofold focus: research in technical, political, and environmental problems of material cycles and waste management; and information that contributes to the development of an interdisciplinary science of material cycles and waste management. Its aim is to develop solutions and prescriptions for material cycles. The journal publishes original articles, reviews, and invited papers from a wide range of disciplines related to material cycles and waste management. The journal is published in cooperation with the Japan Society of Material Cycles and Waste Management (JSMCWM) and the Korea Society of Waste Management (KSWM).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信