Performance of LFSPRO TP53 germline carrier risk predictions compared to standard genetic counseling practice on prospectively collected probands

Jessica L. Corredor, Elissa B. Dodd-Eaton, Jacynda Woodman-Ross, Ashley Woodson, Nam H. Nguyen, Gang Peng, Sierra Green, Angelica M. Gutierrez, Banu K. Arun, Wenyi Wang
{"title":"Performance of LFSPRO TP53 germline carrier risk predictions compared to standard genetic counseling practice on prospectively collected probands","authors":"Jessica L. Corredor, Elissa B. Dodd-Eaton, Jacynda Woodman-Ross, Ashley Woodson, Nam H. Nguyen, Gang Peng, Sierra Green, Angelica M. Gutierrez, Banu K. Arun, Wenyi Wang","doi":"10.1101/2024.07.09.24310095","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose Current clinical guidelines for genetic testing for Li-Fraumeni Syndrome (LFS) have many limitations, primarily the criteria don't consider detailed personal and family history information and may miss many individuals with LFS. A personalized risk assessment tool, LFSPRO, was created to estimate a proband's risk for LFS based on personal and family history information. The purpose of this study is to compare LFSPRO to existing clinical criteria to determine if LFSPRO can outperform these tools. Additionally, we gauged genetic counselors' (GCs) experience using LFSPRO for their patients. Methods Between December 2021 and March 2024, GCs identified patients concerning for LFS based on the patients' personal and family history information. This information was entered into LFSPRO to predict the risk to have a pathogenic/pathogenic (LP/P) germline TP53 variant. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) was compared between LFSPRO and Chompret criteria. Select GCs were asked to fill out surveys regarding their experience using LFSPRO following their genetic counseling appointments. Results LFSPRO's sensitivity and specificity were 0.529 and 0.781 compared to Chompret's respective 0.235 and 0.677. Additionally, LFSPRO had a positive predictive value (PPV) of 0.30 compared to Chompret's 0.114. LFSPRO's risk prediction was concordant with genetic testing results in 75% of probands. Eighty-one percent of GC surveys reported LFSPRO being concordant with the GC's expectations and 75% would feel comfortable sharing the results with patients. Conclusion LFSPRO showed improved sensitivity and specificity compared to Chompret criteria and GCs report a positive experience with LFSPRO. LFSPRO can be used to increase access to genetic testing for patients at risk for LFS and could help healthcare providers give more direct risk assessments regarding LFS testing and management for patients.","PeriodicalId":501437,"journal":{"name":"medRxiv - Oncology","volume":"25 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"medRxiv - Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.07.09.24310095","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose Current clinical guidelines for genetic testing for Li-Fraumeni Syndrome (LFS) have many limitations, primarily the criteria don't consider detailed personal and family history information and may miss many individuals with LFS. A personalized risk assessment tool, LFSPRO, was created to estimate a proband's risk for LFS based on personal and family history information. The purpose of this study is to compare LFSPRO to existing clinical criteria to determine if LFSPRO can outperform these tools. Additionally, we gauged genetic counselors' (GCs) experience using LFSPRO for their patients. Methods Between December 2021 and March 2024, GCs identified patients concerning for LFS based on the patients' personal and family history information. This information was entered into LFSPRO to predict the risk to have a pathogenic/pathogenic (LP/P) germline TP53 variant. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) was compared between LFSPRO and Chompret criteria. Select GCs were asked to fill out surveys regarding their experience using LFSPRO following their genetic counseling appointments. Results LFSPRO's sensitivity and specificity were 0.529 and 0.781 compared to Chompret's respective 0.235 and 0.677. Additionally, LFSPRO had a positive predictive value (PPV) of 0.30 compared to Chompret's 0.114. LFSPRO's risk prediction was concordant with genetic testing results in 75% of probands. Eighty-one percent of GC surveys reported LFSPRO being concordant with the GC's expectations and 75% would feel comfortable sharing the results with patients. Conclusion LFSPRO showed improved sensitivity and specificity compared to Chompret criteria and GCs report a positive experience with LFSPRO. LFSPRO can be used to increase access to genetic testing for patients at risk for LFS and could help healthcare providers give more direct risk assessments regarding LFS testing and management for patients.
LFSPRO TP53 种系携带者风险预测与标准遗传咨询实践在前瞻性收集的探究者中的性能比较
目的 目前关于李-弗劳米尼综合征(LFS)基因检测的临床指南有很多局限性,主要是这些标准没有考虑详细的个人和家族病史信息,可能会遗漏很多李-弗劳米尼综合征患者。LFSPRO是一种个性化的风险评估工具,可根据个人和家族史信息估算出概率人患LFS的风险。本研究的目的是将 LFSPRO 与现有的临床标准进行比较,以确定 LFSPRO 是否优于这些工具。此外,我们还评估了遗传咨询师(GCs)为患者使用 LFSPRO 的经验。方法 在 2021 年 12 月至 2024 年 3 月期间,遗传咨询师根据患者的个人和家族病史信息确定与 LFS 有关的患者。将这些信息输入 LFSPRO,以预测致病/致病(LP/P)种系 TP53 变异的风险。比较了 LFSPRO 和 Chompret 标准的敏感性、特异性、阳性预测值 (PPV) 和阴性预测值 (NPV)。要求部分遗传咨询师在遗传咨询预约后填写有关其使用 LFSPRO 经验的调查问卷。结果 LFSPRO 的灵敏度和特异性分别为 0.529 和 0.781,而 Chompret 的灵敏度和特异性分别为 0.235 和 0.677。此外,LFSPRO 的阳性预测值 (PPV) 为 0.30,而 Chompret 为 0.114。LFSPRO 的风险预测与 75% 的原发者的基因检测结果一致。81%的 GC 调查报告称 LFSPRO 符合 GC 的预期,75% 的 GC 表示愿意与患者分享结果。结论 与 Chompret 标准相比,LFSPRO 显示出更高的灵敏度和特异性,GC 报告称 LFSPRO 带来了积极的体验。LFSPRO 可用于增加 LFS 高危患者接受基因检测的机会,并可帮助医疗服务提供者对患者的 LFS 检测和管理进行更直接的风险评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信