A meaning-making perspective on digital ridesharing platforms in underdeveloped markets

IF 4.8 3区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS
Karen Amissah, David Sarpong, Derrick Boakye, David John Carrington
{"title":"A meaning-making perspective on digital ridesharing platforms in underdeveloped markets","authors":"Karen Amissah, David Sarpong, Derrick Boakye, David John Carrington","doi":"10.1108/imr-08-2023-0193","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Purpose</h3>\n<p>The digital platform-based sharing economy has become ubiquitous all over the world. In this paper, we explore how market actors’ conflicting interpretations of digital platforms’ business models give form and shape value co-creation and capture practices in contexts marked by weak institutions and underdeveloped markets.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\n<p>Integrating insights from the broader literature on digital platforms and the contemporary turn to “meaning-making” in social theory, we adopt a problematization method to unpack the collective contest over the interpretation of value co-creation and capture from ridesharing platforms in contexts marked by weak institutions and underdeveloped markets.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Findings</h3>\n<p>Collective contest over the interpretation of digital business models may give rise to competing meanings that may enable (or impede) digital platform providers’ ability to co-create and capture value. We present an integrative framework that delineates how firms caught up in such collective contests in contexts marked by weak institutions and underdeveloped markets may utilise such conditions as marketing resources to reset their organising logic in ways that reconcile the conflicting perspectives.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Practical implications</h3>\n<p>The paper presents propositions constituting a contribution to a meaning-making perspective on ridesharing digital platforms by offering insights into how digital business models could potentially be localised and adapted to address and align with the peculiarities of contexts. It goes further to present a theoretical model to extend our understanding of the different sources of contestation of meaning of digital platforms.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\n<p>The meaning-making perspective on digital platforms extends our understanding of how the collective contest over interpretations of value co-creation and capture may offer a set of contradictory frames that yield possibilities for ridesharing platform providers, and their users, to assimilate the organising logic of digital business models into new categories of understanding.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->","PeriodicalId":14456,"journal":{"name":"International Marketing Review","volume":"17 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Marketing Review","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/imr-08-2023-0193","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

The digital platform-based sharing economy has become ubiquitous all over the world. In this paper, we explore how market actors’ conflicting interpretations of digital platforms’ business models give form and shape value co-creation and capture practices in contexts marked by weak institutions and underdeveloped markets.

Design/methodology/approach

Integrating insights from the broader literature on digital platforms and the contemporary turn to “meaning-making” in social theory, we adopt a problematization method to unpack the collective contest over the interpretation of value co-creation and capture from ridesharing platforms in contexts marked by weak institutions and underdeveloped markets.

Findings

Collective contest over the interpretation of digital business models may give rise to competing meanings that may enable (or impede) digital platform providers’ ability to co-create and capture value. We present an integrative framework that delineates how firms caught up in such collective contests in contexts marked by weak institutions and underdeveloped markets may utilise such conditions as marketing resources to reset their organising logic in ways that reconcile the conflicting perspectives.

Practical implications

The paper presents propositions constituting a contribution to a meaning-making perspective on ridesharing digital platforms by offering insights into how digital business models could potentially be localised and adapted to address and align with the peculiarities of contexts. It goes further to present a theoretical model to extend our understanding of the different sources of contestation of meaning of digital platforms.

Originality/value

The meaning-making perspective on digital platforms extends our understanding of how the collective contest over interpretations of value co-creation and capture may offer a set of contradictory frames that yield possibilities for ridesharing platform providers, and their users, to assimilate the organising logic of digital business models into new categories of understanding.

从意义建构角度看欠发达市场中的数字共享乘车平台
目的以数字平台为基础的共享经济已在世界各地无处不在。在本文中,我们将探讨在制度薄弱和市场不发达的背景下,市场参与者对数字平台商业模式的相互冲突的解释是如何形成和塑造价值共创和获取实践的。设计/方法/途径结合更广泛的数字平台文献以及当代社会理论中对 "意义生成 "的研究,我们采用问题化方法来解读在制度薄弱和市场不发达的背景下,人们对共享出行平台价值共创和获取的集体争论。研究结果对数字商业模式的集体争论可能会产生相互竞争的意义,从而促进(或阻碍)数字平台提供商的价值共创和获取能力。我们提出了一个综合框架,描述了在制度薄弱、市场不发达的环境下,陷入这种集体竞争的企业如何利用营销资源等条件,以调和相互冲突的观点的方式重新设定其组织逻辑。 本文提出了一些命题,这些命题有助于从意义塑造的角度来看待共享出行数字平台,深入探讨了数字商业模式如何进行本地化调整,以应对和适应环境的特殊性。本文还进一步提出了一个理论模型,以扩展我们对数字平台意义争论的不同来源的理解。 原创性/价值 数字平台的意义创造视角扩展了我们的理解,即对价值共同创造和获取的解释的集体争论如何提供了一系列矛盾的框架,从而为共享出行平台提供商及其用户提供了将数字商业模式的组织逻辑同化为新的理解范畴的可能性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.70
自引率
12.00%
发文量
55
期刊介绍: International Marketing Review (IMR) is a journal that has, as its core remit, the goal of publishing research that pushes back the boundaries of international marketing knowledge. IMR does this by publishing novel research ideas, and by publishing papers that add substance to, question the basic assumptions of, reframe, or otherwise shape what we think we know within in the international marketing field. IMR is pluralistic, publishing papers that are conceptual, quantitative-empirical, or qualitative-empirical. At IMR, we aim to be a journal that recognizes great papers and great research ideas, and works hard with authors to nurture those ideas through to publication. We aim to be a journal that is proactive in developing the research agenda in international marketing, by identifying critical research issues, and promoting research within those areas. Finally, IMR is a journal that is comfortable exploring, and that fosters the exploration of, the interfaces and overlaps between international marketing and other business disciplines. Where no interfaces or overlaps exist, IMR will be a journal that is ready to create them. IMR’s definition of international marketing is purposefully broad and includes, although is not restricted to: -International market entry decisions and relationships; -Export marketing and supply chain issues; -International retailing; -International channel management; -Consumer ethnocentrism, country and product image and origin effects; -Cultural considerations in international marketing; -International marketing strategy; -Aspects of international marketing management such as international branding, advertising and new product development.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信