Radiomics Based on Multimodal magnetic resonance imaging for the Differential Diagnosis of Benign and Malignant Vertebral Compression Fractures.

IF 1.8 2区 医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
Orthopaedic Surgery Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-09 DOI:10.1111/os.14148
Wei Geng, Jingfen Zhu, Mao Li, Bin Pi, Xiantao Wang, Junhui Xing, Haibo Xu, Huilin Yang
{"title":"Radiomics Based on Multimodal magnetic resonance imaging for the Differential Diagnosis of Benign and Malignant Vertebral Compression Fractures.","authors":"Wei Geng, Jingfen Zhu, Mao Li, Bin Pi, Xiantao Wang, Junhui Xing, Haibo Xu, Huilin Yang","doi":"10.1111/os.14148","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Recent studies have indicated that radiomics may have excellent performance and clinical application prospects in the differential diagnosis of benign and malignant vertebral compression fractures (VCFs). However, multimodal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based radiomics model is rarely used in the differential diagnosis of benign and malignant VCFs, and is limited to lumbar. Herein, this study intends to develop and validate MRI radiomics models for differential diagnoses of benign and malignant VCFs in patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cross-sectional study involved 151 adult patients diagnosed with VCF in The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University in 2016-2021. The study was conducted in three steps: (i) the original MRI images were segmented, and the region of interest (ROI) was marked out; (ii) among the extracted features, those features with Pearson's correlation coefficient lower than 0.9 and the top 15 with the highest variance and Lasso regression coefficient less than and more than 0 were selected; (iii) MRI images and combined data were studied by logistic regression, decision tree, random forest and extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) models in training set and the test set (ratio of 8:2), respectively; and the models were further verified and evaluated for the differential diagnosis performance. The evaluated indexes included area under receiver (AUC) of operating characteristic curve, accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value (NPV), positive predictive value (PPV), and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). The AUCs were used to assess the predictive performance of different machine learning modes for benign and malignant VCFs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 1144 radiomics features, and 14 clinical features were extracted. Finally, 12 radiomics features were included in the radiomics model, and 12 radiomics features with 14 clinical features were included in the combined model. In the radiomics model, the differential diagnosis performance in the logistic regression model with the AUC of 0.905 ± 0.026, accuracy of 0.817 ± 0.057, sensitivity of 0.831 ± 0.065, and negative predictive value of 0.813 ± 0.042, was superior to the other three. In the combined model, XGBoost model had the superior differential diagnosis performance with specificity (0.979 ± 0.026) and positive predictive value (0.971 ± 0.035).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The multimodal MRI-based radiomics model performed well in the differential diagnosis of benign and malignant VCFs, which may provide a tool for clinicians to differentially diagnose VCFs.</p>","PeriodicalId":19566,"journal":{"name":"Orthopaedic Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11456728/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Orthopaedic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/os.14148","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Recent studies have indicated that radiomics may have excellent performance and clinical application prospects in the differential diagnosis of benign and malignant vertebral compression fractures (VCFs). However, multimodal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based radiomics model is rarely used in the differential diagnosis of benign and malignant VCFs, and is limited to lumbar. Herein, this study intends to develop and validate MRI radiomics models for differential diagnoses of benign and malignant VCFs in patients.

Methods: This cross-sectional study involved 151 adult patients diagnosed with VCF in The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University in 2016-2021. The study was conducted in three steps: (i) the original MRI images were segmented, and the region of interest (ROI) was marked out; (ii) among the extracted features, those features with Pearson's correlation coefficient lower than 0.9 and the top 15 with the highest variance and Lasso regression coefficient less than and more than 0 were selected; (iii) MRI images and combined data were studied by logistic regression, decision tree, random forest and extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) models in training set and the test set (ratio of 8:2), respectively; and the models were further verified and evaluated for the differential diagnosis performance. The evaluated indexes included area under receiver (AUC) of operating characteristic curve, accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value (NPV), positive predictive value (PPV), and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). The AUCs were used to assess the predictive performance of different machine learning modes for benign and malignant VCFs.

Results: A total of 1144 radiomics features, and 14 clinical features were extracted. Finally, 12 radiomics features were included in the radiomics model, and 12 radiomics features with 14 clinical features were included in the combined model. In the radiomics model, the differential diagnosis performance in the logistic regression model with the AUC of 0.905 ± 0.026, accuracy of 0.817 ± 0.057, sensitivity of 0.831 ± 0.065, and negative predictive value of 0.813 ± 0.042, was superior to the other three. In the combined model, XGBoost model had the superior differential diagnosis performance with specificity (0.979 ± 0.026) and positive predictive value (0.971 ± 0.035).

Conclusion: The multimodal MRI-based radiomics model performed well in the differential diagnosis of benign and malignant VCFs, which may provide a tool for clinicians to differentially diagnose VCFs.

Abstract Image

基于多模态磁共振成像的放射组学用于良性和恶性椎体压缩骨折的鉴别诊断。
目的:最近的研究表明,放射组学在良性和恶性椎体压缩骨折(VCF)的鉴别诊断中可能具有卓越的性能和临床应用前景。然而,基于多模态磁共振成像(MRI)的放射组学模型很少用于良性和恶性椎体压缩骨折的鉴别诊断,而且仅限于腰椎。因此,本研究旨在开发和验证 MRI 放射组学模型,用于患者良性和恶性 VCF 的鉴别诊断:本横断面研究涉及 2016-2021 年在苏州大学附属第一医院确诊的 151 例 VCF 成人患者。研究分三步进行:(i) 对原始 MRI 图像进行分割,并标出感兴趣区(ROI);(ii) 在提取的特征中,皮尔逊相关系数低于 0.9 的特征和方差最大且 Lasso 回归系数小于和大于 0 的前 15 个特征;(iii) 在训练集和测试集(比例为 8:2)中分别使用逻辑回归、决策树、随机森林和极端梯度提升(XGBoost)模型对 MRI 图像和组合数据进行研究,并进一步验证和评估模型的鉴别诊断性能。评估指标包括操作特征曲线的接收器下面积(AUC)、准确性、灵敏度、特异性、阴性预测值(NPV)、阳性预测值(PPV)和 95% 置信区间(CIs)。AUC用于评估不同机器学习模式对良性和恶性VCF的预测性能:结果:共提取了1144个放射组学特征和14个临床特征。最后,12 个放射组学特征被纳入放射组学模型,12 个放射组学特征与 14 个临床特征被纳入组合模型。在放射组学模型中,逻辑回归模型的鉴别诊断性能(AUC)为 0.905 ± 0.026,准确率为 0.817 ± 0.057,灵敏度为 0.831 ± 0.065,阴性预测值为 0.813 ± 0.042,优于其他三个模型。在组合模型中,XGBoost 模型的特异性(0.979 ± 0.026)和阳性预测值(0.971 ± 0.035)的鉴别诊断性能更优:基于多模态 MRI 的放射组学模型在良性和恶性 VCF 的鉴别诊断中表现良好,可为临床医生鉴别诊断 VCF 提供工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Orthopaedic Surgery
Orthopaedic Surgery ORTHOPEDICS-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
14.30%
发文量
374
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊介绍: Orthopaedic Surgery (OS) is the official journal of the Chinese Orthopaedic Association, focusing on all aspects of orthopaedic technique and surgery. The journal publishes peer-reviewed articles in the following categories: Original Articles, Clinical Articles, Review Articles, Guidelines, Editorials, Commentaries, Surgical Techniques, Case Reports and Meeting Reports.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信