Evaluating the Impact of Point-of-Care Electroencephalography on Length of Stay in the Intensive Care Unit: Subanalysis of the SAFER-EEG Trial.

IF 3.1 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Neurocritical Care Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-09 DOI:10.1007/s12028-024-02039-6
Masoom Desai, Mariel Kalkach-Aparicio, Irfan S Sheikh, Justine Cormier, Kaileigh Gallagher, Omar M Hussein, Jorge Cespedes, Lawrence J Hirsch, Brandon Westover, Aaron F Struck
{"title":"Evaluating the Impact of Point-of-Care Electroencephalography on Length of Stay in the Intensive Care Unit: Subanalysis of the SAFER-EEG Trial.","authors":"Masoom Desai, Mariel Kalkach-Aparicio, Irfan S Sheikh, Justine Cormier, Kaileigh Gallagher, Omar M Hussein, Jorge Cespedes, Lawrence J Hirsch, Brandon Westover, Aaron F Struck","doi":"10.1007/s12028-024-02039-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Electroencephalography (EEG) is needed to diagnose nonconvulsive seizures. Prolonged nonconvulsive seizures are associated with neuronal injuries and deleterious clinical outcomes. However, it is uncertain whether the rapid identification of these seizures using point-of-care EEG (POC-EEG) can have a positive impact on clinical outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In a retrospective subanalysis of the recently completed multicenter Seizure Assessment and Forecasting with Efficient Rapid-EEG (SAFER-EEG) trial, we compared intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay (LOS), unfavorable functional outcome (modified Rankin Scale score ≥ 4), and time to EEG between adult patients receiving a US Food and Drug Administration-cleared POC-EEG (Ceribell, Inc.) and those receiving conventional EEG (conv-EEG). Patient records from January 2018 to June 2022 at three different academic centers were reviewed, focusing on EEG timing and clinical outcomes. Propensity score matching was applied using key clinical covariates to control for confounders. Medians and interquartile ranges (IQRs) were calculated for descriptive statistics. Nonparametric tests (Mann-Whitney U-test) were used for the continuous variables, and the χ<sup>2</sup> test was used for the proportions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 283 ICU patients (62 conv-EEG, 221 POC-EEG) were included. The two populations were matched using demographic and clinical characteristics. We found that the ICU LOS was significantly shorter in the POC-EEG cohort compared to the conv-EEG cohort (3.9 [IQR 1.9-8.8] vs. 8.0 [IQR 3.0-16.0] days, p = 0.003). Moreover, modified Rankin Scale functional outcomes were also different between the two EEG cohorts (p = 0.047).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study reveals a significant association between early POC-EEG detection of nonconvulsive seizures and decreased ICU LOS. The POC-EEG differed from conv-EEG, demonstrating better functional outcomes compared with the latter in a matched analysis. These findings corroborate previous research advocating the benefit of early diagnosis of nonconvulsive seizure. The causal relationship between the type of EEG and metrics of interest, such as ICU LOS and functional/clinical outcomes, needs to be confirmed in future prospective randomized studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":19118,"journal":{"name":"Neurocritical Care","volume":" ","pages":"108-117"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurocritical Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12028-024-02039-6","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Electroencephalography (EEG) is needed to diagnose nonconvulsive seizures. Prolonged nonconvulsive seizures are associated with neuronal injuries and deleterious clinical outcomes. However, it is uncertain whether the rapid identification of these seizures using point-of-care EEG (POC-EEG) can have a positive impact on clinical outcomes.

Methods: In a retrospective subanalysis of the recently completed multicenter Seizure Assessment and Forecasting with Efficient Rapid-EEG (SAFER-EEG) trial, we compared intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay (LOS), unfavorable functional outcome (modified Rankin Scale score ≥ 4), and time to EEG between adult patients receiving a US Food and Drug Administration-cleared POC-EEG (Ceribell, Inc.) and those receiving conventional EEG (conv-EEG). Patient records from January 2018 to June 2022 at three different academic centers were reviewed, focusing on EEG timing and clinical outcomes. Propensity score matching was applied using key clinical covariates to control for confounders. Medians and interquartile ranges (IQRs) were calculated for descriptive statistics. Nonparametric tests (Mann-Whitney U-test) were used for the continuous variables, and the χ2 test was used for the proportions.

Results: A total of 283 ICU patients (62 conv-EEG, 221 POC-EEG) were included. The two populations were matched using demographic and clinical characteristics. We found that the ICU LOS was significantly shorter in the POC-EEG cohort compared to the conv-EEG cohort (3.9 [IQR 1.9-8.8] vs. 8.0 [IQR 3.0-16.0] days, p = 0.003). Moreover, modified Rankin Scale functional outcomes were also different between the two EEG cohorts (p = 0.047).

Conclusions: This study reveals a significant association between early POC-EEG detection of nonconvulsive seizures and decreased ICU LOS. The POC-EEG differed from conv-EEG, demonstrating better functional outcomes compared with the latter in a matched analysis. These findings corroborate previous research advocating the benefit of early diagnosis of nonconvulsive seizure. The causal relationship between the type of EEG and metrics of interest, such as ICU LOS and functional/clinical outcomes, needs to be confirmed in future prospective randomized studies.

Abstract Image

评估护理点脑电图对重症监护病房住院时间的影响:SAFER-EEG 试验子分析。
背景:诊断非惊厥性癫痫发作需要脑电图(EEG)。长时间的非惊厥性癫痫发作与神经元损伤和有害的临床结果有关。然而,使用床旁脑电图(POC-EEG)快速识别这些癫痫发作是否会对临床结果产生积极影响尚不确定:在最近完成的多中心癫痫发作评估和预测与高效快速脑电图(SAFER-EEG)试验的回顾性子分析中,我们比较了接受美国食品和药物管理局批准的 POC-EEG (Ceribell, Inc.研究人员查阅了三个不同学术中心 2018 年 1 月至 2022 年 6 月的患者记录,重点关注脑电图时间和临床结果。使用关键临床协变量进行倾向评分匹配,以控制混杂因素。中位数和四分位数间距(IQR)被计算用于描述性统计。连续变量采用非参数检验(Mann-Whitney U检验),比例采用χ2检验:共纳入 283 名 ICU 患者(62 名 conv-EEG,221 名 POC-EEG)。两组患者的人口统计学和临床特征相匹配。我们发现 POC-EEG 组群的 ICU LOS 明显短于 conv-EEG 组群(3.9 [IQR 1.9-8.8] 天 vs. 8.0 [IQR 3.0-16.0] 天,p = 0.003)。此外,两个脑电图队列的改良Rankin量表功能结果也不同(p = 0.047):本研究揭示了非惊厥性癫痫发作的早期 POC-EEG 检测与 ICU LOS 缩短之间的重要联系。POC-EEG 与 conv-EEG 不同,在匹配分析中,POC-EEG 与 conv-EEG 相比具有更好的功能预后。这些研究结果证实了之前的研究主张早期诊断非惊厥性癫痫发作的益处。脑电图类型与 ICU LOS 和功能/临床预后等相关指标之间的因果关系需要在未来的前瞻性随机研究中加以证实。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Neurocritical Care
Neurocritical Care 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
8.60%
发文量
221
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Neurocritical Care is a peer reviewed scientific publication whose major goal is to disseminate new knowledge on all aspects of acute neurological care. It is directed towards neurosurgeons, neuro-intensivists, neurologists, anesthesiologists, emergency physicians, and critical care nurses treating patients with urgent neurologic disorders. These are conditions that may potentially evolve rapidly and could need immediate medical or surgical intervention. Neurocritical Care provides a comprehensive overview of current developments in intensive care neurology, neurosurgery and neuroanesthesia and includes information about new therapeutic avenues and technological innovations. Neurocritical Care is the official journal of the Neurocritical Care Society.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信