Neuromodulation for postherpetic neuralgia: Preliminary experience in a single center

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Bowen Chang , Song Wang , Jiaming Mei
{"title":"Neuromodulation for postherpetic neuralgia: Preliminary experience in a single center","authors":"Bowen Chang ,&nbsp;Song Wang ,&nbsp;Jiaming Mei","doi":"10.1016/j.clineuro.2024.108438","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Postherpetic neuralgia (PHN) after herpes zoster is a debilitating complication that severely affects the quality of life of patients. Neuromodulation such as spinal cord stimulation (SCS) and trigeminal semilunar ganglion stimulation (TSGS) have become effective methods for treating postherpetic neuralgia.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A retrospective analysis of clinical data from 30 patients with postherpetic neuralgia who underwent SCS or TSGS treatment from January 2022 to January 2024. Patients received conventional treatment before neuromodulation. Clinical data including patient age, gender, pain characteristics, treatment outcomes were collected. The efficacy was evaluated using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) and the Modified Global Impression of Change scale. Optimal stimulation parameters were also analyzed.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The results showed that postoperative pain was significantly reduced in both SCS and TSGS groups, with a higher satisfaction rate in the SCS group (89 % vs. 77 %). The optimal stimulation parameters for the two treatments were also different. Compared to SCS, TSGS required a higher frequency but lower pulse width and voltage.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>This study suggests that neuromodulation may be an effective treatment for PHN, but the subtle differences between SCS and TSGS support a more personalized treatment approach.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":10385,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0303846724003251","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Postherpetic neuralgia (PHN) after herpes zoster is a debilitating complication that severely affects the quality of life of patients. Neuromodulation such as spinal cord stimulation (SCS) and trigeminal semilunar ganglion stimulation (TSGS) have become effective methods for treating postherpetic neuralgia.

Methods

A retrospective analysis of clinical data from 30 patients with postherpetic neuralgia who underwent SCS or TSGS treatment from January 2022 to January 2024. Patients received conventional treatment before neuromodulation. Clinical data including patient age, gender, pain characteristics, treatment outcomes were collected. The efficacy was evaluated using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) and the Modified Global Impression of Change scale. Optimal stimulation parameters were also analyzed.

Results

The results showed that postoperative pain was significantly reduced in both SCS and TSGS groups, with a higher satisfaction rate in the SCS group (89 % vs. 77 %). The optimal stimulation parameters for the two treatments were also different. Compared to SCS, TSGS required a higher frequency but lower pulse width and voltage.

Conclusion

This study suggests that neuromodulation may be an effective treatment for PHN, but the subtle differences between SCS and TSGS support a more personalized treatment approach.

神经调控治疗带状疱疹后遗神经痛:单个中心的初步经验。
背景:带状疱疹后遗神经痛(PHN带状疱疹后遗神经痛(PHN)是一种使人衰弱的并发症,严重影响患者的生活质量。脊髓刺激(SCS)和三叉神经半月神经节刺激(TSGS)等神经调节疗法已成为治疗带状疱疹后遗神经痛的有效方法:对2022年1月至2024年1月期间接受SCS或TSGS治疗的30名带状疱疹后遗神经痛患者的临床数据进行回顾性分析。患者在接受神经调控前接受了常规治疗。收集的临床数据包括患者的年龄、性别、疼痛特征和治疗效果。疗效评估采用视觉模拟量表(VAS)和改良全球变化印象量表。同时还分析了最佳刺激参数:结果显示,SCS 组和 TSGS 组的术后疼痛均明显减轻,SCS 组的满意度更高(89% 对 77%)。两种疗法的最佳刺激参数也不同。与 SCS 相比,TSGS 需要更高的频率,但脉冲宽度和电压较低:这项研究表明,神经调控可能是治疗 PHN 的有效方法,但 SCS 和 TSGS 之间的细微差别支持采用更加个性化的治疗方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery
Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
5.30%
发文量
358
审稿时长
46 days
期刊介绍: Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery is devoted to publishing papers and reports on the clinical aspects of neurology and neurosurgery. It is an international forum for papers of high scientific standard that are of interest to Neurologists and Neurosurgeons world-wide.
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信