Representation of Racial Diversity on US Plastic Surgery Websites: A Cross-sectional Study: Racial Diversity on Plastic Surgery Websites.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY
Annals of Plastic Surgery Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-08 DOI:10.1097/SAP.0000000000004051
Maria J Escobar-Domingo, Amir-Ala Mahmoud, Daniela Lee, Iulianna Taritsa, Jose Foppiani, Angelica Hernandez Alvarez, Kirsten Schuster, Samuel J Lin, Bernard T Lee
{"title":"Representation of Racial Diversity on US Plastic Surgery Websites: A Cross-sectional Study: Racial Diversity on Plastic Surgery Websites.","authors":"Maria J Escobar-Domingo, Amir-Ala Mahmoud, Daniela Lee, Iulianna Taritsa, Jose Foppiani, Angelica Hernandez Alvarez, Kirsten Schuster, Samuel J Lin, Bernard T Lee","doi":"10.1097/SAP.0000000000004051","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The racial diversity portrayed in plastic and reconstructive surgery (PRS) media is an important indicator of an inclusive environment for potential patients. To evaluate the degree to which PRS websites demonstrate inclusivity, we assessed the racial composition of both patients and plastic surgeons depicted on the most visited academic and private PRS websites to determine the extent to which racial diversity is represented.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A cross-sectional study was conducted in September 2023. The 10 most visited websites in each state were identified. Sociodemographic characteristics including race and sex of patients and plastic surgeons, as well as the type of practice, were collected. Race was classified according to individuals' Fitzpatrick Phototypes into White and non-White. Differences in patient and surgeon representation were compared to the 2020 US Census and the 2020 ASPS demographics using χ 2 tests. Subgroup analyses were conducted to identify differences by type of practice and region.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We analyzed a total of 2,752 patients from 462 websites belonging to 930 plastic surgeons. PRS websites were predominantly from private practices (93%). Regarding patient representation, 92.6% were female, 7.4% were male, 87.6% were White, and 12.4% were non-White. The surgeon population on the studied webpages was 75.1% male, 92.1% White, and 7.8% non-White. Statistically significant differences were found in the patient population when compared to the 2020 national ( P < 0.001) and regional ( P < 0.001) US Census demographics and the 2020 ASPS Statistics Report ( P < 0.001). Although minority representation was significantly higher on academic websites compared to private practice (22.9% vs. 12.1%; P = 0.007), both were significantly lower than the percentage of minority patients undergoing PRS.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study illuminates racial disparities in the representation of racial groups among patients and plastic surgeons in the most frequented plastic surgery websites. Moreover, it underscores the imperative to bolster racial diversity within the digital content of both private and academic PRS websites. Greater racial representation can foster a more inclusive perception of the plastic surgery field, which may potentially broaden access to care and enrich the professional landscape.</p>","PeriodicalId":8060,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Plastic Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Plastic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/SAP.0000000000004051","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The racial diversity portrayed in plastic and reconstructive surgery (PRS) media is an important indicator of an inclusive environment for potential patients. To evaluate the degree to which PRS websites demonstrate inclusivity, we assessed the racial composition of both patients and plastic surgeons depicted on the most visited academic and private PRS websites to determine the extent to which racial diversity is represented.

Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted in September 2023. The 10 most visited websites in each state were identified. Sociodemographic characteristics including race and sex of patients and plastic surgeons, as well as the type of practice, were collected. Race was classified according to individuals' Fitzpatrick Phototypes into White and non-White. Differences in patient and surgeon representation were compared to the 2020 US Census and the 2020 ASPS demographics using χ 2 tests. Subgroup analyses were conducted to identify differences by type of practice and region.

Results: We analyzed a total of 2,752 patients from 462 websites belonging to 930 plastic surgeons. PRS websites were predominantly from private practices (93%). Regarding patient representation, 92.6% were female, 7.4% were male, 87.6% were White, and 12.4% were non-White. The surgeon population on the studied webpages was 75.1% male, 92.1% White, and 7.8% non-White. Statistically significant differences were found in the patient population when compared to the 2020 national ( P < 0.001) and regional ( P < 0.001) US Census demographics and the 2020 ASPS Statistics Report ( P < 0.001). Although minority representation was significantly higher on academic websites compared to private practice (22.9% vs. 12.1%; P = 0.007), both were significantly lower than the percentage of minority patients undergoing PRS.

Conclusions: This study illuminates racial disparities in the representation of racial groups among patients and plastic surgeons in the most frequented plastic surgery websites. Moreover, it underscores the imperative to bolster racial diversity within the digital content of both private and academic PRS websites. Greater racial representation can foster a more inclusive perception of the plastic surgery field, which may potentially broaden access to care and enrich the professional landscape.

美国整形外科网站上的种族多样性代表:横断面研究:整形外科网站上的种族多样性。
背景:整形外科(PRS)媒体中描述的种族多样性是衡量潜在患者所处环境是否具有包容性的一个重要指标。为了评估整形外科网站的包容性程度,我们评估了访问量最大的学术和私人整形外科网站上的患者和整形外科医生的种族构成,以确定种族多样性的体现程度:我们于 2023 年 9 月进行了一项横断面研究。确定了每个州访问量最大的 10 个网站。研究收集了社会人口学特征,包括患者和整形外科医生的种族、性别以及执业类型。种族根据个人的菲茨帕特里克光型分为白人和非白人。使用 χ2 检验将患者和外科医生的代表性差异与 2020 年美国人口普查和 2020 年 ASPS 人口统计数据进行比较。我们还进行了分组分析,以确定不同执业类型和地区的差异:我们分析了 930 名整形外科医生的 462 个网站中的 2752 名患者。PRS网站主要来自私人诊所(93%)。在患者代表方面,92.6%为女性,7.4%为男性,87.6%为白人,12.4%为非白人。研究网页上的外科医生中,男性占 75.1%,白人占 92.1%,非白人占 7.8%。与 2020 年美国全国人口普查(P < 0.001)和地区人口普查(P < 0.001)以及 2020 年美国外科医师协会统计报告(P < 0.001)相比,患者人群存在明显的统计学差异。尽管与私人诊所相比,少数民族在学术网站上的比例明显更高(22.9% vs. 12.1%;P = 0.007),但两者都明显低于接受PRS的少数民族患者的比例:本研究揭示了在最常访问的整形外科网站中,患者和整形外科医生在种族群体代表性方面的差异。此外,它还强调了在私营和学术性 PRS 网站的数字内容中加强种族多样性的必要性。提高种族代表性可以促进人们对整形外科领域更包容的认识,从而有可能拓宽获得医疗服务的渠道并丰富专业领域。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
13.30%
发文量
584
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The only independent journal devoted to general plastic and reconstructive surgery, Annals of Plastic Surgery serves as a forum for current scientific and clinical advances in the field and a sounding board for ideas and perspectives on its future. The journal publishes peer-reviewed original articles, brief communications, case reports, and notes in all areas of interest to the practicing plastic surgeon. There are also historical and current reviews, descriptions of surgical technique, and lively editorials and letters to the editor.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信