Nonbinary and Transgender Male Patient Preferences for Gender-Affirming Top Surgery.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY
Annals of Plastic Surgery Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-10 DOI:10.1097/SAP.0000000000004052
Rachel E Schafer, R'ay Fodor, Riley Marlar, Kate K Jensen, Abigail Meyers, Raymond Isakov, Cecile Ferrando, Antonio Rampazzo, Bahar Bassiri Gharb
{"title":"Nonbinary and Transgender Male Patient Preferences for Gender-Affirming Top Surgery.","authors":"Rachel E Schafer, R'ay Fodor, Riley Marlar, Kate K Jensen, Abigail Meyers, Raymond Isakov, Cecile Ferrando, Antonio Rampazzo, Bahar Bassiri Gharb","doi":"10.1097/SAP.0000000000004052","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study aimed to identify patient preferences and outcomes of chest masculinization surgery in patients identifying as nonbinary versus transgender (trans-) males.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients who underwent chest masculinization (2003-2022) were included. Demographics, medical comorbidities, surgical approaches, complications, secondary procedures, and BODY-Q chest module survey responses were compared between cohorts.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Three hundred two patients were included. Thirteen percent identified as nonbinary and 87% as trans-male. The most common surgical approach in both groups was double incision with free nipple-areola graft (63% vs 71%, P = 0.33). Nonbinary patients more frequently opted for double incision without free nipple areola graft compared to trans-male patients (18% vs 2.7%, P < 0.001). Other unique surgical requests of nonbinary patients included nipple areola preservation and small breast mound preservation (5.2%) and balance between losing bulk and achieving a more androgynous appearance (5.3%). The survey response rate was 31% (93/302). Both groups reported improved quality of life postoperatively ( P = 0.16). Three nonbinary patients elected not to keep their nipple-areola complexes ( P = 0.005). Trans-male patients were more likely to report having a male chest as very important for their gender identity (82% vs 95%, P = 0.043). Nonbinary patients were less likely to prefer small nipples (82% vs 95%, P = 0.033) and 18% stated that they preferred no nipples (vs 2.7% trans-male patients, P < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Nonbinary patients have distinct surgical preferences regarding nipple-areola complexes. Chest masculinization planning can differ for this group of patients compared to their trans-male counterparts.</p>","PeriodicalId":8060,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Plastic Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Plastic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/SAP.0000000000004052","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/10 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: This study aimed to identify patient preferences and outcomes of chest masculinization surgery in patients identifying as nonbinary versus transgender (trans-) males.

Methods: Patients who underwent chest masculinization (2003-2022) were included. Demographics, medical comorbidities, surgical approaches, complications, secondary procedures, and BODY-Q chest module survey responses were compared between cohorts.

Results: Three hundred two patients were included. Thirteen percent identified as nonbinary and 87% as trans-male. The most common surgical approach in both groups was double incision with free nipple-areola graft (63% vs 71%, P = 0.33). Nonbinary patients more frequently opted for double incision without free nipple areola graft compared to trans-male patients (18% vs 2.7%, P < 0.001). Other unique surgical requests of nonbinary patients included nipple areola preservation and small breast mound preservation (5.2%) and balance between losing bulk and achieving a more androgynous appearance (5.3%). The survey response rate was 31% (93/302). Both groups reported improved quality of life postoperatively ( P = 0.16). Three nonbinary patients elected not to keep their nipple-areola complexes ( P = 0.005). Trans-male patients were more likely to report having a male chest as very important for their gender identity (82% vs 95%, P = 0.043). Nonbinary patients were less likely to prefer small nipples (82% vs 95%, P = 0.033) and 18% stated that they preferred no nipples (vs 2.7% trans-male patients, P < 0.001).

Conclusions: Nonbinary patients have distinct surgical preferences regarding nipple-areola complexes. Chest masculinization planning can differ for this group of patients compared to their trans-male counterparts.

非二元和变性男性患者对确认性别的顶部手术的偏好。
背景:本研究旨在确定非二元性与跨性别(变性)男性患者对胸部男性化手术的偏好和结果:本研究旨在确定非二元男性与变性(跨性别)男性患者对胸部男性化手术的偏好和结果:方法:纳入接受胸部男性化手术的患者(2003-2022 年)。方法:纳入接受胸部男性化手术的患者(2003-2022 年),比较两组患者的人口统计学特征、合并症、手术方法、并发症、二次手术和 BODY-Q 胸部模块调查回复:结果:共纳入 32 名患者。13%的患者被认定为非二元性,87%的患者被认定为变性男性。两组患者中最常见的手术方法都是双切口游离乳头乳晕移植术(63% vs 71%,P = 0.33)。与变性男性患者相比,非二元患者更常选择双切口,但不进行游离乳头乳晕移植(18% vs 2.7%,P < 0.001)。非二元患者的其他独特手术要求包括保留乳头乳晕和小乳丘(5.2%),以及在减小体积和获得更雌雄同体的外观之间取得平衡(5.3%)。调查回复率为 31%(93/302)。两组患者术后的生活质量均有所改善(P = 0.16)。三名非二元患者选择不保留乳头乳晕复合体(P = 0.005)。变性男性患者更有可能认为拥有男性胸部对他们的性别认同非常重要(82% 对 95%,P = 0.043)。非二元患者不太可能喜欢小乳头(82% vs 95%,P = 0.033),18%的患者表示他们喜欢没有乳头(vs 2.7% 的变性男性患者,P < 0.001):结论:非二元患者对乳头乳晕复合体有不同的手术偏好。结论:非二元患者对乳头乳晕复合体有不同的手术偏好,与变性男性患者相比,这类患者的胸部男性化规划可能会有所不同。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
13.30%
发文量
584
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The only independent journal devoted to general plastic and reconstructive surgery, Annals of Plastic Surgery serves as a forum for current scientific and clinical advances in the field and a sounding board for ideas and perspectives on its future. The journal publishes peer-reviewed original articles, brief communications, case reports, and notes in all areas of interest to the practicing plastic surgeon. There are also historical and current reviews, descriptions of surgical technique, and lively editorials and letters to the editor.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信