The Association of Surgical Setting With Opioid Prescribing Patterns Following Wide-Awake Trigger Finger Release.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY
Alexander J Kammien, Maria Shvedova, Omar Allam, Adnan Prsic, Jonathan N Grauer, David L Colen
{"title":"The Association of Surgical Setting With Opioid Prescribing Patterns Following Wide-Awake Trigger Finger Release.","authors":"Alexander J Kammien, Maria Shvedova, Omar Allam, Adnan Prsic, Jonathan N Grauer, David L Colen","doi":"10.1097/SAP.0000000000004030","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Wide-awake and office-based hand surgeries are increasingly common. The association of these techniques with postoperative pain and pain control has garnered recent attention. A prior study demonstrated that office-based trigger finger release (TFR) were associated with decreased perioperative opioid prescriptions compared to those performed in the operating room. The current study provides an in-depth analysis of the association between surgical setting and perioperative opioid prescriptions for wide-awake TFR.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients undergoing TFR between 2010 and 2021 were identified in PearlDiver, a national administrative claims database. Exclusion criteria were age <18 years, <6 months of preoperative data, <1 month of postoperative data, bilateral TFR, and concomitant hand surgery. To identify wide-awake cases, patients with procedural codes for general anesthesia, monitored anesthesia care, sedation and regional blocks were excluded. Patients were stratified by surgical setting (office or operating room), then matched based on age, sex, Elixhauser Comorbidity Index score, and geographic region. Patients with prior opioid prescriptions, opioid dependence, opioid abuse, substance use disorder, chronic back/neck pain, generalized anxiety, and major depression were identified. Perioperative opioid prescriptions (those filled within 7 days before or 30 days after surgery) were characterized.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 16,604 matched wide-awake TFR patients in each cohort. In the cohort of office-based patients, 4,993 (30%) filled a prescription for perioperative opioids, in contrast to 8,763 (53%) patients who underwent surgery in the operating room. This disparity was statistically significant in both univariate and multivariate analyses. Univariate analysis indicated that office-based surgeries were linked to lower morphine milligram equivalents (MME) in opioid prescriptions than those performed in operating rooms (median of 140 vs 150, respectively). However, multivariate analysis demonstrated that opioid prescriptions for office-based surgeries were actually associated with greater MME.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Patients undergoing office-based TFR were less likely to fill perioperative opioid prescriptions but were prescribed opioids with greater MME. In wide-awake TFR, it appears that a disparity may exist in patient and provider beliefs about postoperative pain control. Future patient- and provider-level investigations may produce insights into perceptions of postoperative pain and pain control, which may be useful for reducing opioid prescriptions across surgical settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":8060,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Plastic Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Plastic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/SAP.0000000000004030","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Wide-awake and office-based hand surgeries are increasingly common. The association of these techniques with postoperative pain and pain control has garnered recent attention. A prior study demonstrated that office-based trigger finger release (TFR) were associated with decreased perioperative opioid prescriptions compared to those performed in the operating room. The current study provides an in-depth analysis of the association between surgical setting and perioperative opioid prescriptions for wide-awake TFR.

Methods: Patients undergoing TFR between 2010 and 2021 were identified in PearlDiver, a national administrative claims database. Exclusion criteria were age <18 years, <6 months of preoperative data, <1 month of postoperative data, bilateral TFR, and concomitant hand surgery. To identify wide-awake cases, patients with procedural codes for general anesthesia, monitored anesthesia care, sedation and regional blocks were excluded. Patients were stratified by surgical setting (office or operating room), then matched based on age, sex, Elixhauser Comorbidity Index score, and geographic region. Patients with prior opioid prescriptions, opioid dependence, opioid abuse, substance use disorder, chronic back/neck pain, generalized anxiety, and major depression were identified. Perioperative opioid prescriptions (those filled within 7 days before or 30 days after surgery) were characterized.

Results: There were 16,604 matched wide-awake TFR patients in each cohort. In the cohort of office-based patients, 4,993 (30%) filled a prescription for perioperative opioids, in contrast to 8,763 (53%) patients who underwent surgery in the operating room. This disparity was statistically significant in both univariate and multivariate analyses. Univariate analysis indicated that office-based surgeries were linked to lower morphine milligram equivalents (MME) in opioid prescriptions than those performed in operating rooms (median of 140 vs 150, respectively). However, multivariate analysis demonstrated that opioid prescriptions for office-based surgeries were actually associated with greater MME.

Conclusions: Patients undergoing office-based TFR were less likely to fill perioperative opioid prescriptions but were prescribed opioids with greater MME. In wide-awake TFR, it appears that a disparity may exist in patient and provider beliefs about postoperative pain control. Future patient- and provider-level investigations may produce insights into perceptions of postoperative pain and pain control, which may be useful for reducing opioid prescriptions across surgical settings.

宽醒扳机指松解术后阿片类药物处方模式与手术环境的关系。
导言:全麻和诊室手外科手术越来越普遍。这些技术与术后疼痛和疼痛控制的关系最近引起了人们的关注。之前的一项研究表明,与在手术室进行的扳机指松解术(TFR)相比,诊室扳机指松解术与围手术期阿片类药物处方的减少有关。本研究深入分析了宽醒 TFR 的手术环境与围手术期阿片类药物处方之间的关联:方法:在全国行政索赔数据库 PearlDiver 中确定了 2010 年至 2021 年期间接受 TFR 手术的患者。排除标准为年龄:每个队列中有 16,604 名匹配的宽醒 TFR 患者。在诊室患者队列中,有 4993 人(30%)开具了围手术期阿片类药物处方,而在手术室接受手术的患者有 8763 人(53%)开具了围手术期阿片类药物处方。这一差异在单变量和多变量分析中均具有统计学意义。单变量分析表明,诊室手术的阿片类药物处方中吗啡毫克当量(MME)低于手术室手术(中位数分别为 140 与 150)。然而,多变量分析表明,诊室手术的阿片类药物处方实际上与更高的吗啡毫克当量有关:结论:在诊室进行 TFR 的患者不太可能开具围手术期阿片类药物处方,但开具的阿片类药物的 MME 却更高。在清醒状态下的 TFR 中,患者和医疗服务提供者对术后疼痛控制的看法似乎存在差异。未来的患者和医疗服务提供者层面的调查可能会深入了解患者对术后疼痛和疼痛控制的看法,这可能有助于减少各种手术环境下的阿片类药物处方。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
13.30%
发文量
584
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The only independent journal devoted to general plastic and reconstructive surgery, Annals of Plastic Surgery serves as a forum for current scientific and clinical advances in the field and a sounding board for ideas and perspectives on its future. The journal publishes peer-reviewed original articles, brief communications, case reports, and notes in all areas of interest to the practicing plastic surgeon. There are also historical and current reviews, descriptions of surgical technique, and lively editorials and letters to the editor.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信