Efficacy and safety of the combination or monotherapy with GLP-1 receptor agonists and SGLT-2 inhibitors in Type 2 diabetes mellitus: An update systematic review and meta-analysis

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Adili Tuersun MA , Guanxin Hou BA , Gang Cheng PhD
{"title":"Efficacy and safety of the combination or monotherapy with GLP-1 receptor agonists and SGLT-2 inhibitors in Type 2 diabetes mellitus: An update systematic review and meta-analysis","authors":"Adili Tuersun MA ,&nbsp;Guanxin Hou BA ,&nbsp;Gang Cheng PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.amjms.2024.07.011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>To evaluate the efficacy and safety of combination therapy with sodium-glucose cotransporter2(SGLT-2) inhibitors and glucagon-like peptide-1(GLP-1) receptor agonists in the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>To construct an exhaustive database of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) concerning SGLT-2 inhibitors and GLP-1 agonists, a methodical search was undertaken across a range of databases, such as Embase, PubMed, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, from their inception to January 2023. Following this, a meta-analysis was executed to amalgamate the collected data, which allowed for the calculation of standardized mean differences (SMDs), odds ratios (ORs), and 95 % confidence intervals (CIs) for a spectrum of outcomes. This analytical approach was designed to yield a quantitative evaluation of the therapeutic efficacy and safety profile of SGLT-2 inhibitors and GLP-1 agonists for the treatment of diabetes mellitus.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>When compared to GLP-1 agonist therapy alone, the combination therapy did not significantly reduce fasting plasma glucose (FPG) levels (95 % confidence interval [CI]: -0.27, 0.10; <em>p</em> = 0.35), body weight (95 % CI: -0.18, 0.18; <em>p</em> = 1.00), Glycosylated Hemoglobin, Type A1C (HbA1c) (95 % CI: -0.29, 0.07; <em>p</em> = 0.22), or systolic blood pressure (SBP) values (95 % CI: -0.29, 0.06; <em>p</em> = 0.21). In contrast, when compared to SGLT-2 inhibitor therapy alone, combination therapy significantly decreased FPG by 0.24 mmol/L (95 % CI: -0.43, -0.05; <em>p</em> = 0.01), HbA1c by 0.45 % (95 % CI: -0.72, -0.18; <em>p</em> = 0.001), and SBP by 0.12 mmHg (95 % CI: -0.24, 0.00; <em>p</em> = 0.05). However, the combination therapy failed to demonstrate a significant reduction in body weight when compared with either SGLT-2 inhibitor therapy (95 % CI: -0.20, 0.05; <em>p</em> = 0.24) or GLP-1 agonist therapy (95 % CI: -0.18, 0.18; <em>p</em> = 1.00). Additionally, the combination therapy did not increase the incidence of hypoglycemia. It should be noted that data regarding mortality and cardiovascular outcomes were limited.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>The combination treatment of SGLT-2 inhibitors and GLP-1 receptor agonists effectively reduces HbA1c, FPG, and SBP without elevating the risk of hypoglycemia when compared to monotherapy with SGLT-2 inhibitors. However, these beneficial effects were not observed when the combination therapy was compared with GLP-1 receptor agonist treatment alone.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55526,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of the Medical Sciences","volume":"368 6","pages":"Pages 579-588"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of the Medical Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S000296292401348X","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of combination therapy with sodium-glucose cotransporter2(SGLT-2) inhibitors and glucagon-like peptide-1(GLP-1) receptor agonists in the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM).

Methods

To construct an exhaustive database of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) concerning SGLT-2 inhibitors and GLP-1 agonists, a methodical search was undertaken across a range of databases, such as Embase, PubMed, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, from their inception to January 2023. Following this, a meta-analysis was executed to amalgamate the collected data, which allowed for the calculation of standardized mean differences (SMDs), odds ratios (ORs), and 95 % confidence intervals (CIs) for a spectrum of outcomes. This analytical approach was designed to yield a quantitative evaluation of the therapeutic efficacy and safety profile of SGLT-2 inhibitors and GLP-1 agonists for the treatment of diabetes mellitus.

Results

When compared to GLP-1 agonist therapy alone, the combination therapy did not significantly reduce fasting plasma glucose (FPG) levels (95 % confidence interval [CI]: -0.27, 0.10; p = 0.35), body weight (95 % CI: -0.18, 0.18; p = 1.00), Glycosylated Hemoglobin, Type A1C (HbA1c) (95 % CI: -0.29, 0.07; p = 0.22), or systolic blood pressure (SBP) values (95 % CI: -0.29, 0.06; p = 0.21). In contrast, when compared to SGLT-2 inhibitor therapy alone, combination therapy significantly decreased FPG by 0.24 mmol/L (95 % CI: -0.43, -0.05; p = 0.01), HbA1c by 0.45 % (95 % CI: -0.72, -0.18; p = 0.001), and SBP by 0.12 mmHg (95 % CI: -0.24, 0.00; p = 0.05). However, the combination therapy failed to demonstrate a significant reduction in body weight when compared with either SGLT-2 inhibitor therapy (95 % CI: -0.20, 0.05; p = 0.24) or GLP-1 agonist therapy (95 % CI: -0.18, 0.18; p = 1.00). Additionally, the combination therapy did not increase the incidence of hypoglycemia. It should be noted that data regarding mortality and cardiovascular outcomes were limited.

Conclusions

The combination treatment of SGLT-2 inhibitors and GLP-1 receptor agonists effectively reduces HbA1c, FPG, and SBP without elevating the risk of hypoglycemia when compared to monotherapy with SGLT-2 inhibitors. However, these beneficial effects were not observed when the combination therapy was compared with GLP-1 receptor agonist treatment alone.
GLP-1 受体激动剂和 SGLT-2 抑制剂联合或单药治疗 2 型糖尿病的有效性和安全性:最新系统综述与 Meta 分析》。
目的:评估钠-葡萄糖共转运体2(SGLT-2)抑制剂和胰高血糖素样肽-1(GLP-1)受体激动剂联合治疗2型糖尿病(T2DM)的疗效和安全性:为了建立一个有关 SGLT-2 抑制剂和 GLP-1 受体激动剂的随机对照试验 (RCT) 的详尽数据库,我们在一系列数据库(如 Embase、PubMed 和 Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials)中进行了有条不紊的检索,检索时间从开始到 2023 年 1 月。然后,对收集到的数据进行荟萃分析,从而计算出一系列结果的标准化平均差 (SMD)、几率比 (OR) 和 95% 置信区间 (CI)。这种分析方法旨在对 SGLT-2 抑制剂和 GLP-1 激动剂治疗糖尿病的疗效和安全性进行定量评估:结果:与单独使用 GLP-1 激动剂治疗相比,联合疗法并未显著降低空腹血浆葡萄糖 (FPG) 水平(95% 置信区间 [CI]:-0.27,0.10;P=0.35)、体重(95% CI:-0.18,0.18;p=1.00)、糖化血红蛋白 A1C 型(HbA1c)(95% CI:-0.29,0.07;p=0.22)或收缩压(SBP)值(95% CI:-0.29,0.06;p=0.21)。相比之下,与单用 SGLT-2 抑制剂疗法相比,联合疗法可显著降低 FPG 0.24 mmol/L (95% CI: -0.43, -0.05; p=0.01)、HbA1c 0.45% (95% CI: -0.72, -0.18; p=0.001)和 SBP 0.12 mmHg (95% CI: -0.24, 0.00; p=0.05)。然而,与 SGLT-2 抑制剂疗法(95% CI:-0.20,0.05;p=0.24)或 GLP-1 激动剂疗法(95% CI:-0.18,0.18;p=1.00)相比,联合疗法未能显著降低体重。此外,联合疗法不会增加低血糖的发生率。值得注意的是,有关死亡率和心血管后果的数据有限:结论:与 SGLT-2 抑制剂单药治疗相比,SGLT-2 抑制剂和 GLP-1 受体激动剂联合治疗可有效降低 HbA1c、FPG 和 SBP,同时不会增加低血糖风险。然而,与单独使用 GLP-1 受体激动剂治疗相比,联合疗法并没有带来这些益处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
303
审稿时长
1.5 months
期刊介绍: The American Journal of The Medical Sciences (AJMS), founded in 1820, is the 2nd oldest medical journal in the United States. The AJMS is the official journal of the Southern Society for Clinical Investigation (SSCI). The SSCI is dedicated to the advancement of medical research and the exchange of knowledge, information and ideas. Its members are committed to mentoring future generations of medical investigators and promoting careers in academic medicine. The AJMS publishes, on a monthly basis, peer-reviewed articles in the field of internal medicine and its subspecialties, which include: Original clinical and basic science investigations Review articles Online Images in the Medical Sciences Special Features Include: Patient-Centered Focused Reviews History of Medicine The Science of Medical Education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信