Implementation of a High-Value, Evidence-Based Care Program: Impact and Opportunities for Learning Organizations.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
Journal of Healthcare Management Pub Date : 2024-07-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-04 DOI:10.1097/JHM-D-23-00099
Stephen B Williams, Peter McCaffrey, David Reynoso, Phillip Keiser, Rick Trevino, John Heymann, Gulshan Doulatram, Abe DeAnda, Timothy J Harlin, Gulshan Sharma
{"title":"Implementation of a High-Value, Evidence-Based Care Program: Impact and Opportunities for Learning Organizations.","authors":"Stephen B Williams, Peter McCaffrey, David Reynoso, Phillip Keiser, Rick Trevino, John Heymann, Gulshan Doulatram, Abe DeAnda, Timothy J Harlin, Gulshan Sharma","doi":"10.1097/JHM-D-23-00099","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Goal: </strong>Value-based care is not simply a matter of cost, but also one of outcomes and harms per dollar spent. This definition encompasses three key components: healthcare delivery that is organized around patients' medical conditions, costs and outcomes that are actively and consistently measured, and information technology that enables the other two components. Our objective in this project was to implement and measure a systemwide high-value, evidence-based care initiative with five pillars of high-value practices.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a quasi-experimental study from September 1, 2019, to August 31, 2022, of a new care program at the University of Texas Medical Branch. Drawing from the ABIM Foundation's Choosing Wisely Campaign, the program was based on five pillars-blood management and antimicrobial, laboratory, imaging, and opioid stewardship-with interdisciplinary teams led by institutional subject matter experts (i.e., administrative leaders) accompanied by nursing, information technology, pharmacy, and clinical and nonclinical personnel including faculty and trainees. Each pillar addressed two goals with targeted interventions to assess improvements during the first three fiscal years (FYs) of implementation. The targets were set at 10% improvement by the end of each FY. Monthly measurements were recorded for each FY.</p><p><strong>Principal findings: </strong>We tracked performance toward 30 pillar goals and determined that the teams were successful in 50%, 50%, and 70% of their goals for FY 2020, 2021, and 2022, respectively. For example, in the antimicrobial stewardship FY 2021 pillar, one goal was to decrease meropenem days of therapy (DOT) by 10% (baseline was 45 DOT/1,000 patient days; the target was 40.5 DOT/1,000 patient days). We measured quarterly DOT/1,000 patient day rates of 32.02, 30.57, and 26.9, respectively, for a cumulative rate of 26.9. Critical interventions included engaging and empowering providers and service lines (including outliers whose performance was outside norms), educational conferences, and transparent data analyses.</p><p><strong>Practical applications: </strong>We showed that a multidisciplinary approach to the implementation of an evidence-based, high-value care program through a partnership of engaged administrative leaders, providers, and trainees can result in sustainable and measurable high-value healthcare delivery. Specifically, structuring the program with pillars to address defined metrics resulted in progressive improvement in meeting value-based goals at the University of Texas Medical Branch. Also, challenges can be embraced as learning opportunities to inform value-based interventions that range from technological to educational tactics. The results at the University of Texas Medical Branch provide a benchmark for the implementation of a program that engages, empowers, and aligns innovative value-based care initiatives.</p>","PeriodicalId":51633,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Healthcare Management","volume":"69 4","pages":"296-308"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Healthcare Management","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JHM-D-23-00099","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Goal: Value-based care is not simply a matter of cost, but also one of outcomes and harms per dollar spent. This definition encompasses three key components: healthcare delivery that is organized around patients' medical conditions, costs and outcomes that are actively and consistently measured, and information technology that enables the other two components. Our objective in this project was to implement and measure a systemwide high-value, evidence-based care initiative with five pillars of high-value practices.

Methods: We performed a quasi-experimental study from September 1, 2019, to August 31, 2022, of a new care program at the University of Texas Medical Branch. Drawing from the ABIM Foundation's Choosing Wisely Campaign, the program was based on five pillars-blood management and antimicrobial, laboratory, imaging, and opioid stewardship-with interdisciplinary teams led by institutional subject matter experts (i.e., administrative leaders) accompanied by nursing, information technology, pharmacy, and clinical and nonclinical personnel including faculty and trainees. Each pillar addressed two goals with targeted interventions to assess improvements during the first three fiscal years (FYs) of implementation. The targets were set at 10% improvement by the end of each FY. Monthly measurements were recorded for each FY.

Principal findings: We tracked performance toward 30 pillar goals and determined that the teams were successful in 50%, 50%, and 70% of their goals for FY 2020, 2021, and 2022, respectively. For example, in the antimicrobial stewardship FY 2021 pillar, one goal was to decrease meropenem days of therapy (DOT) by 10% (baseline was 45 DOT/1,000 patient days; the target was 40.5 DOT/1,000 patient days). We measured quarterly DOT/1,000 patient day rates of 32.02, 30.57, and 26.9, respectively, for a cumulative rate of 26.9. Critical interventions included engaging and empowering providers and service lines (including outliers whose performance was outside norms), educational conferences, and transparent data analyses.

Practical applications: We showed that a multidisciplinary approach to the implementation of an evidence-based, high-value care program through a partnership of engaged administrative leaders, providers, and trainees can result in sustainable and measurable high-value healthcare delivery. Specifically, structuring the program with pillars to address defined metrics resulted in progressive improvement in meeting value-based goals at the University of Texas Medical Branch. Also, challenges can be embraced as learning opportunities to inform value-based interventions that range from technological to educational tactics. The results at the University of Texas Medical Branch provide a benchmark for the implementation of a program that engages, empowers, and aligns innovative value-based care initiatives.

实施高价值、循证护理计划:学习型组织的影响与机遇。
目标:以价值为基础的医疗不仅仅是成本问题,也是每花费一美元所产生的结果和危害问题。这一定义包含三个关键要素:围绕患者病情组织的医疗服务、积极且持续衡量的成本和结果,以及实现其他两个要素的信息技术。我们在这个项目中的目标是在全系统范围内实施并衡量一项高价值循证医疗计划,该计划有五大高价值实践支柱:我们在 2019 年 9 月 1 日至 2022 年 8 月 31 日期间对德克萨斯大学医学分院的一项新护理计划进行了准实验研究。该计划借鉴了 ABIM 基金会的 "明智选择 "运动,以五大支柱为基础--血液管理和抗菌药物、实验室、成像和阿片类药物管理--由机构主题专家(即行政领导)领导的跨学科团队,以及护理、信息技术、药学、临床和非临床人员(包括教师和受训人员)组成。每个支柱都涉及两个目标,并在实施的前三个财政年度(FYs)采取有针对性的干预措施,以评估改进情况。目标设定为在每个财政年度结束时提高 10%。每个财政年度都记录了每月的测量结果:我们跟踪了 30 个支柱目标的执行情况,并确定各团队在 2020、2021 和 2022 财政年度分别实现了 50%、50% 和 70% 的目标。例如,在 2021 财年抗菌药物管理支柱中,一个目标是将美罗培南治疗天数 (DOT) 减少 10%(基线为 45 DOT/1,000;目标为 40.5 DOT/1,000)。我们测得的季度 DOT/1,000 患者日比率分别为 32.02、30.57 和 26.9,累计比率为 26.9。关键的干预措施包括让医疗服务提供者和服务项目(包括表现超出标准的异常值)参与进来并增强其能力、召开教育会议以及进行透明的数据分析:实际应用:我们的研究表明,通过行政领导、医疗服务提供者和受训人员的合作,采用多学科方法实施循证、高价值护理计划,可以实现可持续、可衡量的高价值医疗服务。具体来说,德克萨斯大学医学分院以支柱来构建计划,以解决确定的指标问题,从而在实现以价值为基础的目标方面取得了逐步改善。此外,还可以将挑战视为学习机会,为基于价值的干预措施提供信息,包括技术和教育策略。德克萨斯大学医学分院的成果为实施一项计划提供了一个基准,该计划旨在吸引、授权和调整创新的价值导向型医疗措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Healthcare Management
Journal of Healthcare Management HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES-
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
5.60%
发文量
68
期刊介绍: The Journal of Healthcare Management is the official journal of the American College of Healthcare Executives. Six times per year, JHM offers timely healthcare management articles that inform and guide executives, managers, educators, and researchers. JHM also contains regular columns written by experts and practitioners in the field that discuss management-related topics and industry trends. Each issue presents an interview with a leading executive.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信