Predicting brace holiday eligibility in juvenile idiopathic scoliosis.

IF 1.6 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Spine deformity Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-08 DOI:10.1007/s43390-024-00924-w
Julianna Lee, Nathan Chaclas, Lucas Hauth, David VanEenenaam, Vineet Desai, John M Flynn
{"title":"Predicting brace holiday eligibility in juvenile idiopathic scoliosis.","authors":"Julianna Lee, Nathan Chaclas, Lucas Hauth, David VanEenenaam, Vineet Desai, John M Flynn","doi":"10.1007/s43390-024-00924-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The psychological effects of scoliosis bracing can be difficult, and thus clinicians sometimes recommend a brace holiday when the curve corrects to less than 25°. However, the clinical indications for taking a break from the brace before reaching maturity have yet to be described. We hypothesized there would be a relationship between brace holiday eligibility and degree of curve at presentation, change in curve magnitude while bracing, and level of bracing compliance.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective cohort study at a single institution was performed from 2016 to 2022. Objective brace compliance I-button data were collected on patients aged 3-9 years old. Patients with other etiologies besides idiopathic scoliosis before the age of 10 were excluded. Binary logistic regression was performed to determine the effect of significant variables on the likelihood of brace holiday.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifty-six patients met inclusion criteria. Of these, 20 were able to get a brace holiday. Patients with higher brace compliance and larger in-brace curve correction were more likely to get a brace holiday (P = 0.015, 0.004). Patients with higher BMIs and larger curves at initial presentation were less likely to get a brace holiday (P = 0.002, 0.014).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Compliant brace wearers with good in-brace correction are most likely to be eligible for a brace holiday. While some elements remain immutable, others are modifiable, such as bracing compliance. Understanding how outcomes differ between patients who do and do not take a brace holiday will be crucial to elucidating if the psychological benefit of taking a break from the brace can be justified.</p>","PeriodicalId":21796,"journal":{"name":"Spine deformity","volume":" ","pages":"1683-1687"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11499379/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Spine deformity","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s43390-024-00924-w","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The psychological effects of scoliosis bracing can be difficult, and thus clinicians sometimes recommend a brace holiday when the curve corrects to less than 25°. However, the clinical indications for taking a break from the brace before reaching maturity have yet to be described. We hypothesized there would be a relationship between brace holiday eligibility and degree of curve at presentation, change in curve magnitude while bracing, and level of bracing compliance.

Methods: A retrospective cohort study at a single institution was performed from 2016 to 2022. Objective brace compliance I-button data were collected on patients aged 3-9 years old. Patients with other etiologies besides idiopathic scoliosis before the age of 10 were excluded. Binary logistic regression was performed to determine the effect of significant variables on the likelihood of brace holiday.

Results: Fifty-six patients met inclusion criteria. Of these, 20 were able to get a brace holiday. Patients with higher brace compliance and larger in-brace curve correction were more likely to get a brace holiday (P = 0.015, 0.004). Patients with higher BMIs and larger curves at initial presentation were less likely to get a brace holiday (P = 0.002, 0.014).

Conclusion: Compliant brace wearers with good in-brace correction are most likely to be eligible for a brace holiday. While some elements remain immutable, others are modifiable, such as bracing compliance. Understanding how outcomes differ between patients who do and do not take a brace holiday will be crucial to elucidating if the psychological benefit of taking a break from the brace can be justified.

预测青少年特发性脊柱侧凸的支架假期资格。
目的:脊柱侧弯矫形带来的心理影响可能很难接受,因此临床医生有时会建议患者在脊柱侧弯矫正到小于25°时暂停使用矫形器。然而,在脊柱侧弯达到成熟度之前暂停支具的临床指征尚未得到描述。我们假设,支撑架休整的资格与就诊时的弯度、支撑时的弯度变化以及支撑依从性之间存在关系:方法:2016 年至 2022 年,我们在一家医疗机构进行了一项回顾性队列研究。研究收集了 3-9 岁患者的客观支具顺应性 I 扣数据。除特发性脊柱侧凸外,排除了10岁前有其他病因的患者。进行二元逻辑回归以确定重要变量对支架假期可能性的影响:结果:56 名患者符合纳入标准。结果:56 名患者符合纳入标准,其中 20 名患者获得了支架假期。支具依从性较高和支具内曲线矫正幅度较大的患者更有可能获得支具假期(P = 0.015,0.004)。体重指数(BMI)较高且初次就诊时曲线较大的患者获得支架假期的可能性较小(P = 0.002,0.014):结论:依从性好、矫治效果好的支具佩戴者最有可能获得支具假期。虽然有些因素是不可改变的,但有些因素是可以改变的,例如矫治依从性。了解戴矫治器和不戴矫治器的患者的疗效有何不同,对于阐明脱离矫治器的心理益处是否合理至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
18.80%
发文量
167
期刊介绍: Spine Deformity the official journal of the?Scoliosis Research Society is a peer-refereed publication to disseminate knowledge on basic science and clinical research into the?etiology?biomechanics?treatment?methods and outcomes of all types of?spinal deformities. The international members of the Editorial Board provide a worldwide perspective for the journal's area of interest.The?journal?will enhance the mission of the Society which is to foster the optimal care of all patients with?spine?deformities worldwide. Articles published in?Spine Deformity?are Medline indexed in PubMed.? The journal publishes original articles in the form of clinical and basic research. Spine Deformity will only publish studies that have institutional review board (IRB) or similar ethics committee approval for human and animal studies and have strictly observed these guidelines. The minimum follow-up period for follow-up clinical studies is 24 months.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信