Effect of positive end expiratory pressure on non-hypoxic apnea time and atelectasis during induction of anesthesia in infant: A randomized controlled trial.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Pediatric Anesthesia Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-09 DOI:10.1111/pan.14965
Eun-Hee Kim, Jung-Bin Park, Pyoyoon Kang, Sang-Hwan Ji, Young-Eun Jang, Ji-Hyun Lee, Jin-Tae Kim, Hee-Soo Kim
{"title":"Effect of positive end expiratory pressure on non-hypoxic apnea time and atelectasis during induction of anesthesia in infant: A randomized controlled trial.","authors":"Eun-Hee Kim, Jung-Bin Park, Pyoyoon Kang, Sang-Hwan Ji, Young-Eun Jang, Ji-Hyun Lee, Jin-Tae Kim, Hee-Soo Kim","doi":"10.1111/pan.14965","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>This study aimed to assess the impact of positive-end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) on the non-hypoxic apnea time in infants during anesthesia induction with an inspired oxygen fraction of 0.8.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This age stratified randomized controlled trial included patients under 1 year of age. Preoxygenation was performed using an inspired oxygen fraction of 0.8 for 2 min. Inspired oxygen fraction of 0.8 was administered via a face mask with volume-controlled ventilation at a tidal volume of 6 mL.kg<sup>-1</sup>, with or without 7 cmH<sub>2</sub>O of PEEP. Tracheal intubation was performed after 3 min of ventilation; however, it was disconnected from the breathing circuit. Ventilation was resumed once the pulse oximetry readings reached 95%. The primary outcome was the non-hypoxic apnea time, defined as the time from the cessation of ventilation to achieving a pulse oximeter reading of 95%. The secondary outcome measures included the degree of atelectasis assessed by ultrasonography and the presence of gastric air insufflation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Eighty-four patients were included in the final analysis. In the positive end-expiratory pressure group, the atelectasis score decreased (17.0 vs. 31.5, p < .001; mean difference and 95% CI of 11.6, 7.5-15.6), while the non-hypoxic apnea time increased (80.1 s vs. 70.6 s, p = .005; mean difference and 95% CI of -9.4, -16.0 to -2.9), compared to the zero end-expiratory pressure group, among infants who are 6 months old or younger, not in those aged older than 6 months.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The application of positive end-expiratory pressure reduced the incidence of atelectasis and extended the non-hypoxic apnea time in infants who are 6 months old or younger. However, it did not affect the incidence of atelectasis nor the non-hypoxic apnea time in patients aged older than 6 months.</p>","PeriodicalId":19745,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric Anesthesia","volume":" ","pages":"1146-1153"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric Anesthesia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/pan.14965","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: This study aimed to assess the impact of positive-end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) on the non-hypoxic apnea time in infants during anesthesia induction with an inspired oxygen fraction of 0.8.

Methods: This age stratified randomized controlled trial included patients under 1 year of age. Preoxygenation was performed using an inspired oxygen fraction of 0.8 for 2 min. Inspired oxygen fraction of 0.8 was administered via a face mask with volume-controlled ventilation at a tidal volume of 6 mL.kg-1, with or without 7 cmH2O of PEEP. Tracheal intubation was performed after 3 min of ventilation; however, it was disconnected from the breathing circuit. Ventilation was resumed once the pulse oximetry readings reached 95%. The primary outcome was the non-hypoxic apnea time, defined as the time from the cessation of ventilation to achieving a pulse oximeter reading of 95%. The secondary outcome measures included the degree of atelectasis assessed by ultrasonography and the presence of gastric air insufflation.

Results: Eighty-four patients were included in the final analysis. In the positive end-expiratory pressure group, the atelectasis score decreased (17.0 vs. 31.5, p < .001; mean difference and 95% CI of 11.6, 7.5-15.6), while the non-hypoxic apnea time increased (80.1 s vs. 70.6 s, p = .005; mean difference and 95% CI of -9.4, -16.0 to -2.9), compared to the zero end-expiratory pressure group, among infants who are 6 months old or younger, not in those aged older than 6 months.

Discussion: The application of positive end-expiratory pressure reduced the incidence of atelectasis and extended the non-hypoxic apnea time in infants who are 6 months old or younger. However, it did not affect the incidence of atelectasis nor the non-hypoxic apnea time in patients aged older than 6 months.

呼气末正压对婴儿麻醉诱导期间非缺氧性呼吸暂停时间和肺不张的影响:随机对照试验。
简介:本研究旨在评估正呼气压力(PEEP)对婴儿在吸入氧分数为 0.8 的麻醉诱导期间非缺氧性呼吸暂停时间的影响:这项年龄分层随机对照试验包括 1 岁以下的患者。用 0.8 的吸氧分数进行预吸氧 2 分钟。在潮气量为 6 mL.kg-1 的情况下,通过面罩进行 0.8 分贝的吸氧,同时进行容积控制通气,带或不带 7 cmH2O 的 PEEP。通气 3 分钟后进行气管插管,但气管插管与呼吸回路断开。一旦脉搏血氧饱和度读数达到 95%,即恢复通气。主要结果是非缺氧性呼吸暂停时间,即从停止通气到脉搏血氧仪读数达到 95% 的时间。次要结果指标包括通过超声波检查评估的无肺泡程度和是否存在胃充气:84名患者被纳入最终分析。在呼气末正压组,肺不张评分下降(17.0 vs. 31.5,p 讨论):对 6 个月或 6 个月以下的婴儿使用呼气末正压可减少肺不张的发生率,延长非缺氧性呼吸暂停时间。但是,对 6 个月以上的患者来说,气胸发生率和非缺氧性呼吸暂停时间均不受影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pediatric Anesthesia
Pediatric Anesthesia 医学-麻醉学
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
11.80%
发文量
222
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Devoted to the dissemination of research of interest and importance to practising anesthetists everywhere, the scientific and clinical content of Pediatric Anesthesia covers a wide selection of medical disciplines in all areas relevant to paediatric anaesthesia, pain management and peri-operative medicine. The International Editorial Board is supported by the Editorial Advisory Board and a team of Senior Advisors, to ensure that the journal is publishing the best work from the front line of research in the field. The journal publishes high-quality, relevant scientific and clinical research papers, reviews, commentaries, pro-con debates, historical vignettes, correspondence, case presentations and book reviews.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信