Clinical Outcomes of Rural Patients with Diabetes Treated by ECHO-Trained Providers Versus an Academic Medical Center.

IF 4.3 2区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Journal of General Internal Medicine Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-09 DOI:10.1007/s11606-024-08925-1
Matthew F Bouchonville, Larissa Myaskovsky, Yuridia L Leyva, Erik B Erhardt, Mark L Unruh, Sanjeev Arora
{"title":"Clinical Outcomes of Rural Patients with Diabetes Treated by ECHO-Trained Providers Versus an Academic Medical Center.","authors":"Matthew F Bouchonville, Larissa Myaskovsky, Yuridia L Leyva, Erik B Erhardt, Mark L Unruh, Sanjeev Arora","doi":"10.1007/s11606-024-08925-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Despite clinical practice guidelines prioritizing cardiorenal risk reduction, national trends in diabetes outcomes, particularly in rural communities, do not mirror the benefits seen in clinical trials with emerging therapeutics and technologies.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>Project ECHO supports implementation of guidelines in under-resourced areas through virtual communities of practice, sharing of best practices, and case-based learning. We hypothesized that diabetes outcomes of patients treated by ECHO-trained primary care providers (PCPs) would be similar to those of patients treated by specialists at an academic medical center.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Specialists from the University of New Mexico (UNM) launched a weekly diabetes ECHO program to mentor dyads consisting of a PCP and community health worker at ten rural clinics.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>We compared cardiorenal risk factor changes in patients with diabetes treated by ECHO-trained dyads to patients treated by specialists at the UNM Diabetes Comprehensive Care Center (DCCC). Eligible participants included adults with type 1 diabetes, type 2 diabetes on insulin, or diabetes of either type with A1c > 9%.</p><p><strong>Main measures: </strong>The primary outcome was change from baseline in A1c in the ECHO and DCCC cohorts. Secondary outcomes included changes in body mass index (BMI), blood pressure, cholesterol, and urine albumin to creatinine ratio (UACR).</p><p><strong>Key results: </strong>Compared to the DCCC cohort (n = 151), patients in the ECHO cohort (n = 856) experienced greater A1c reduction (-1.2% vs -0.6%; p = 0.02 for difference in difference). BMI decreased in the Endo ECHO cohort and increased in the DCCC cohort (-0.2 vs. +1.3 kg/m<sup>2</sup>; p = 0.003 for difference in difference). Diastolic blood pressure declined in the Endo ECHO cohort only. Improvements of similar magnitude were observed in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol in both groups. UACR remained stable in both groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>ECHO may be a suitable intervention for improving diabetes outcomes in rural, under-resourced communities with limited access to a specialist.</p>","PeriodicalId":15860,"journal":{"name":"Journal of General Internal Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"2980-2986"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11576679/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of General Internal Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-024-08925-1","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/9 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Despite clinical practice guidelines prioritizing cardiorenal risk reduction, national trends in diabetes outcomes, particularly in rural communities, do not mirror the benefits seen in clinical trials with emerging therapeutics and technologies.

Objective: Project ECHO supports implementation of guidelines in under-resourced areas through virtual communities of practice, sharing of best practices, and case-based learning. We hypothesized that diabetes outcomes of patients treated by ECHO-trained primary care providers (PCPs) would be similar to those of patients treated by specialists at an academic medical center.

Design: Specialists from the University of New Mexico (UNM) launched a weekly diabetes ECHO program to mentor dyads consisting of a PCP and community health worker at ten rural clinics.

Participants: We compared cardiorenal risk factor changes in patients with diabetes treated by ECHO-trained dyads to patients treated by specialists at the UNM Diabetes Comprehensive Care Center (DCCC). Eligible participants included adults with type 1 diabetes, type 2 diabetes on insulin, or diabetes of either type with A1c > 9%.

Main measures: The primary outcome was change from baseline in A1c in the ECHO and DCCC cohorts. Secondary outcomes included changes in body mass index (BMI), blood pressure, cholesterol, and urine albumin to creatinine ratio (UACR).

Key results: Compared to the DCCC cohort (n = 151), patients in the ECHO cohort (n = 856) experienced greater A1c reduction (-1.2% vs -0.6%; p = 0.02 for difference in difference). BMI decreased in the Endo ECHO cohort and increased in the DCCC cohort (-0.2 vs. +1.3 kg/m2; p = 0.003 for difference in difference). Diastolic blood pressure declined in the Endo ECHO cohort only. Improvements of similar magnitude were observed in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol in both groups. UACR remained stable in both groups.

Conclusions: ECHO may be a suitable intervention for improving diabetes outcomes in rural, under-resourced communities with limited access to a specialist.

Abstract Image

接受过 ECHO 培训的医疗人员与学术医疗中心治疗的农村糖尿病患者的临床疗效。
背景:尽管临床实践指南将降低心肾风险放在首位,但全国的糖尿病结果趋势,尤其是农村社区的糖尿病结果,并没有反映出新兴治疗技术临床试验的益处:尽管临床实践指南将降低心肾风险放在首位,但全国(尤其是农村社区)糖尿病治疗结果的趋势并没有反映出临床试验中新兴疗法和技术所带来的益处:ECHO 项目通过虚拟实践社区、分享最佳实践和基于案例的学习,支持在资源不足的地区实施指南。我们假设,接受过 ECHO 培训的初级保健提供者(PCP)所治疗的糖尿病患者的疗效将与学术医疗中心的专科医生所治疗的患者的疗效相似:设计:新墨西哥大学(UNM)的专科医生在十个农村诊所开展了每周一次的糖尿病 ECHO 计划,指导由初级保健医生和社区保健员组成的二人小组:我们比较了接受过 ECHO 培训的糖尿病患者与接受过 UNM 糖尿病综合治疗中心 (DCCC) 专家治疗的患者的心肾风险因素变化。符合条件的参与者包括成人 1 型糖尿病患者、使用胰岛素的 2 型糖尿病患者或 A1c > 9% 的任一类型糖尿病患者:主要指标:ECHO 和 DCCC 组群的主要结果是 A1c 从基线开始的变化。次要结果包括体重指数(BMI)、血压、胆固醇和尿白蛋白与肌酐比值(UACR)的变化:主要结果:与 DCCC 队列(n = 151)相比,ECHO 队列(n = 856)患者的 A1c 降低幅度更大(-1.2% vs -0.6%;差异 p = 0.02)。Endo ECHO 组群的体重指数有所下降,而 DCCC 组群的体重指数有所上升(-0.2 vs. +1.3 kg/m2;p = 0.003)。只有 Endo ECHO 组群的舒张压有所下降。两组低密度脂蛋白胆固醇的改善幅度相似。两组的 UACR 均保持稳定:结论:ECHO 可能是一种合适的干预措施,可改善农村、资源匮乏社区的糖尿病治疗效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of General Internal Medicine
Journal of General Internal Medicine 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
5.30%
发文量
749
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of General Internal Medicine is the official journal of the Society of General Internal Medicine. It promotes improved patient care, research, and education in primary care, general internal medicine, and hospital medicine. Its articles focus on topics such as clinical medicine, epidemiology, prevention, health care delivery, curriculum development, and numerous other non-traditional themes, in addition to classic clinical research on problems in internal medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信