Survival outcomes after breast cancer surgery among older women with early invasive breast cancer in England: population-based cohort study.

IF 3.5 3区 医学 Q1 SURGERY
BJS Open Pub Date : 2024-07-02 DOI:10.1093/bjsopen/zrae062
Katie Miller, Melissa Ruth Gannon, Jibby Medina, Karen Clements, David Dodwell, Kieran Horgan, Min Hae Park, David Alan Cromwell
{"title":"Survival outcomes after breast cancer surgery among older women with early invasive breast cancer in England: population-based cohort study.","authors":"Katie Miller, Melissa Ruth Gannon, Jibby Medina, Karen Clements, David Dodwell, Kieran Horgan, Min Hae Park, David Alan Cromwell","doi":"10.1093/bjsopen/zrae062","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This study assessed the influence of age, co-morbidity and frailty on 5-year survival outcomes after breast conservation surgery (BCS) with radiotherapy (RT) versus mastectomy (with or without RT) in women with early invasive breast cancer.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Women aged over 50 years with early invasive breast cancer diagnosed in England (2014-2019) who had breast surgery were identified from Cancer Registry data. Survival estimates were calculated from a flexible parametric survival model. A competing risk approach was used for breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS). Standardized survival probabilities and cumulative incidence functions for breast cancer death were calculated for each treatment by age.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 101 654 women, 72.2% received BCS + RT and 27.8% received mastectomy. Age, co-morbidity and frailty were associated with overall survival (OS), but only age and co-morbidity were associated with BCSS. Survival probabilities for OS were greater for BCS + RT (90.3%) versus mastectomy (87.0%), and the difference between treatments varied by age (50 years: 1.9% versus 80 years: 6.5%). Cumulative incidence functions for breast cancer death were higher after mastectomy (5.1%) versus BCS + RT (3.9%), but there was little change in the difference by age (50 years: 0.9% versus 80 years: 1.2%). The results highlight the change in baseline mortality risk by age for OS compared to the stable baseline for BCSS.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>For OS, the difference in survival probabilities for BCS + RT and mastectomy increased slightly with age. The difference in cumulative incidence functions for breast cancer death by surgery type was small regardless of age. Evidence on real-world survival outcomes among older populations with breast cancer is informative for treatment decision-making.</p>","PeriodicalId":9028,"journal":{"name":"BJS Open","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11229699/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BJS Open","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsopen/zrae062","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: This study assessed the influence of age, co-morbidity and frailty on 5-year survival outcomes after breast conservation surgery (BCS) with radiotherapy (RT) versus mastectomy (with or without RT) in women with early invasive breast cancer.

Methods: Women aged over 50 years with early invasive breast cancer diagnosed in England (2014-2019) who had breast surgery were identified from Cancer Registry data. Survival estimates were calculated from a flexible parametric survival model. A competing risk approach was used for breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS). Standardized survival probabilities and cumulative incidence functions for breast cancer death were calculated for each treatment by age.

Results: Among 101 654 women, 72.2% received BCS + RT and 27.8% received mastectomy. Age, co-morbidity and frailty were associated with overall survival (OS), but only age and co-morbidity were associated with BCSS. Survival probabilities for OS were greater for BCS + RT (90.3%) versus mastectomy (87.0%), and the difference between treatments varied by age (50 years: 1.9% versus 80 years: 6.5%). Cumulative incidence functions for breast cancer death were higher after mastectomy (5.1%) versus BCS + RT (3.9%), but there was little change in the difference by age (50 years: 0.9% versus 80 years: 1.2%). The results highlight the change in baseline mortality risk by age for OS compared to the stable baseline for BCSS.

Conclusion: For OS, the difference in survival probabilities for BCS + RT and mastectomy increased slightly with age. The difference in cumulative incidence functions for breast cancer death by surgery type was small regardless of age. Evidence on real-world survival outcomes among older populations with breast cancer is informative for treatment decision-making.

英国早期浸润性乳腺癌老年妇女乳腺癌手术后的生存结果:基于人群的队列研究。
研究背景本研究评估了早期浸润性乳腺癌女性患者在接受乳房保护手术(BCS)加放疗(RT)与乳房切除术(加或不加放疗)后,年龄、并发症和虚弱程度对5年生存结果的影响:从癌症登记数据中识别出在英格兰(2014-2019年)确诊患有早期浸润性乳腺癌且接受过乳房手术的50岁以上女性。通过灵活的参数生存模型计算出生存期估计值。乳腺癌特异性生存率(BCSS)采用竞争风险法。按年龄计算了每种治疗方法的标准化生存概率和乳腺癌死亡累积发生率函数:在 101 654 名妇女中,72.2% 接受了 BCS + RT,27.8% 接受了乳房切除术。年龄、并发症和体弱与总生存率(OS)有关,但只有年龄和并发症与BCSS有关。BCS+RT(90.3%)与乳房切除术(87.0%)相比,OS的生存概率更高,不同年龄的患者接受不同治疗的差异也不同(50岁:1.9%;80岁:6.5%)。乳房切除术(5.1%)与BCS+RT(3.9%)相比,乳腺癌死亡累积发病率较高,但不同年龄段的差异变化不大(50 岁:0.9% 对 80 岁:1.2%)。结果突出表明,与 BCSS 的稳定基线相比,OS 的基线死亡风险随年龄而变化:就OS而言,随着年龄的增长,BCS+RT和乳房切除术的生存概率差异略有增加。无论年龄如何,按手术类型划分的乳腺癌死亡累积发生率函数差异很小。有关老年乳腺癌患者实际生存结果的证据对治疗决策具有参考价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BJS Open
BJS Open SURGERY-
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
3.20%
发文量
144
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信