[Instruments for assessing stress in Brazilians: an integrative review].

Milton José Cazassa, George M Slavich, Victoria Helena Pesenti E Silva, Lauren Heineck de Souza, Elisa Steinhorst Damasceno, Raissa Telesca Arrial Cordeiro, Margareth Da Silva Oliveira
{"title":"[Instruments for assessing stress in Brazilians: an integrative review].","authors":"Milton José Cazassa, George M Slavich, Victoria Helena Pesenti E Silva, Lauren Heineck de Souza, Elisa Steinhorst Damasceno, Raissa Telesca Arrial Cordeiro, Margareth Da Silva Oliveira","doi":"10.5935/1808-5687.20230041","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Numerous instruments have been developed around the world to assess stress. This study aimed to identify instruments with validation studies that mapping stress in Brazil.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>an integrative review was carried out on databases and the Testing System of the Federal Council of Psychology (SATEPSI) in June 2017 and updated this year. Two independent judges participated in analyzing the results.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 6,377 articles, 47 articles were selected from the Index Psi, SciELO, LILACS and PubMed databases, and 35 instruments made up the sample, two of which were from SATEPSI. Nine of these tools map stress in a more general way, nine are aimed at specific clinical contexts, 12 are aimed at occupational stress, three at the sports context and another two at other contexts.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Numerous health problems are associated with early and chronic stressors, however it was identified that most instruments access stress in a more recent period of time (last year, month or week). A more accurate analysis of the relationships between longitudinal stress and health outcomes appears limited in this sense. The Stress and Adversity Inventory (STRAIN) appears as an alternative for studying stress throughout life in the Brazilian reality.</p>","PeriodicalId":519970,"journal":{"name":"Revista brasileira de terapias cognitivas","volume":"19 Spec","pages":"122-132"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11223748/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista brasileira de terapias cognitivas","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5935/1808-5687.20230041","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Numerous instruments have been developed around the world to assess stress. This study aimed to identify instruments with validation studies that mapping stress in Brazil.

Method: an integrative review was carried out on databases and the Testing System of the Federal Council of Psychology (SATEPSI) in June 2017 and updated this year. Two independent judges participated in analyzing the results.

Results: Of the 6,377 articles, 47 articles were selected from the Index Psi, SciELO, LILACS and PubMed databases, and 35 instruments made up the sample, two of which were from SATEPSI. Nine of these tools map stress in a more general way, nine are aimed at specific clinical contexts, 12 are aimed at occupational stress, three at the sports context and another two at other contexts.

Discussion: Numerous health problems are associated with early and chronic stressors, however it was identified that most instruments access stress in a more recent period of time (last year, month or week). A more accurate analysis of the relationships between longitudinal stress and health outcomes appears limited in this sense. The Stress and Adversity Inventory (STRAIN) appears as an alternative for studying stress throughout life in the Brazilian reality.

[巴西人压力评估工具:综合评述]。
介绍:世界各地开发了许多评估压力的工具。本研究旨在确定在巴西绘制压力图的具有验证研究的工具。方法:2017 年 6 月在数据库和联邦心理学委员会测试系统(SATEPSI)上进行了综合审查,并于今年进行了更新。两名独立评委参与了结果分析:在6377篇文章中,47篇选自Index Psi、SciELO、LILACS和PubMed数据库,35种工具构成样本,其中两种来自SATEPSI。这些工具中,有 9 种是以更普遍的方式测绘压力的,9 种是针对特定临床环境的,12 种是针对职业压力的,3 种是针对体育环境的,另外 2 种是针对其他环境的:讨论:许多健康问题都与早期和慢性压力因素有关,但我们发现,大多数工具都是在较近的时间段(去年、本月或本周)测量压力。从这个意义上讲,对纵向压力和健康结果之间关系的更准确分析似乎是有限的。在巴西,压力与逆境量表(STRAIN)似乎是研究终生压力的一种替代方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信